Jim Brown Appeals Case Over Whether Or Not EA Can Use His Likeness In A Video Game

from the first-amendment? dept

Back in September last year, we wrote about an important district court ruling that said video game maker EA was within its rights to use a likeness of football player Jim Brown in its video games. In the past few decades, there has been a dangerous expansion in so-called "publicity rights," like this that effectively put serious limits on what others can do. This expansion needs to be challenged, even if it seems like something so simple as a video game. Not surprisingly, however, Brown is now appealing the district court's decision to dismiss the case, saying that he wasn't able to present all the facts. We noted last year that this case would certainly be appealed, so this doesn't come as a huge surprise. Still, it should be a case worth watching if you are concerned about the expansion of concepts like publicity rights (and, on the flip side, about free expression rights).
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: jim brown, likeness, publicity rights, video games
Companies: ea


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    sehlat (profile), 7 Jul 2010 @ 6:56pm

    This isn't "free expression rights."

    This is about a corporation exploiting Mr. Brown's face and reputation to make money off both of them. He has every right to demand that they either forgo using his likeness or pay him for the privilege.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 7:03pm

      Re: This isn't "free expression rights."

      Uhh...why?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 7:34pm

      Re: This isn't "free expression rights."

      This is not just about a corporation, is about people too.

      Jim Brown if it wins can stifle free speech and democracy.

      Next every politician has a tool to take down others that use his/her image, next anyone posting a photo of someone else will have to endure C&D letters etc.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Poster, 8 Jul 2010 @ 4:31am

        Re: Re: This isn't "free expression rights."

        "Next every politician has a tool to take down others that use his/her image"

        Or their words.

        Free speech > publicity rights any day of the week, in my opinion.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    trilobug, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:14pm

    EA will cave and take him out of the game. That is the easiest option, he doesn't add that much value to the product. I imagine some companies are on eggshells with these types of deals after what happened to Guitar Hero and how Activision used certain likenesses.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      imbrucy (profile), 8 Jul 2010 @ 5:57am

      Re:

      Normally I would agree, but I could see EA actually fighting this because of the long term benefits for them. Currently they license all the players in the game through the Players Association. Imagine how that situation would change if the court said they didn't need to license every player's likeness.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Evan, 8 Jul 2010 @ 5:11am

    Jim Brown ain't a football player

    Jim Brown isn't a football player. He's a football fan who wears a dog mask.

    The original case alleges that EA used his likeness (that of a football fan wearing a dog mask) in the last iteration of their Madden football series.

    God forbid that a football game portray a football fan wearing a mask - note that they did not use the man's actual likeness, rather they used an image of a football fan wearing a dog mask. Does this mean that if I attend a football game wearing a dog mask, I am infringing upon Jim Brown's absolutely original idea and that I owe him something?

    I don't think so.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jesus, 8 Jul 2010 @ 6:10am

    My likeness has been showing up everywhere lately and I've been meaning to have a talk with you guys about that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mitch Featherston, 12 Jul 2010 @ 6:01am

    Hmmm...

    I am not sure what "likeness" means in terms of a video game. It seems to me that if the character in the game is said to be Jim Brown, and the 3d model looks like him, then he has a legit case, I think. I am not a fan of publicity rights except in the case of unlawful use. It seems like EA would need permission from Mr Brown to portray him as a character in a game.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 12 Jul 2010 @ 1:39pm

      Re: Hmmm...

      It seems like EA would need permission from Mr Brown to portray him as a character in a game.

      Why? Other than because the law says so of course.

      I am not a fan of publicity rights except in the case of unlawful use.

      Isn't that just another way of saying you're a fan of publicity rights?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Emrah, 22 Jul 2010 @ 11:01am

    thanks

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Sponsored Promotion
Public Money, Public Code - Sign The Open Letter at publiccode.eu
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.