by Mike Masnick
Wed, Jan 20th 2010 2:15am
For a while now, we've tried very carefully to not make the mistake that is common in the press (and among politicians) to assume that "the recording industry" (i.e., the record labels) is "the music industry." The two are quite different. In fact, by almost every measure, the music industry has been thriving over the past few years, while the recording industry is in rapid decline. And yet, the two are regularly confused. So it's nice to see a new paper come out arguing that it's time to stop inappropriately using "the music industry" to only discuss or identify a small subsegment of the overall music industry. This is important -- because when you realize that the recording industry is only a piece of the puzzle, it suddenly makes you realize that the RIAA does not, in fact, represent "the music industry" at all, but rather a tiny segment of the industry.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Recording Industry Whines That It's Too Costly To Keep Copyright Terms At Life Plus 50, Instead Of Life Plus 70
- The Ridiculous Concept Of The 'Value Gap' In Music Services... And How It Could Harm Both The Tech Industry And The Music Industry
- China's Home-Grown Version Of Spotify Shows How To Make Money In A World Of Digital Abundance
- Despite Massive Streaming Revenue Gains, RIAA Still Lying & Crying
- Early YouTube Musician Explains How Signing Major Label Deal 'Nearly Destroyed My Career'