Reuters Blogger Questions Reuters Editorial Actions: Transparency In Action

from the does-this-make-reuters-more-trustworthy-or-less? dept

Well, here's an interesting one. There were reports last week claiming that Reuters had spiked a story about hedge fund big shot Steven Cohen after Cohen complained to Reuters management. While Reuters has since strongly denied the charge, it is interesting to note (as sent in by reader JJ) that at least one Reuters blogger complained quite vocally about this decision. The full blog post, written on Reuter's Hedge World blog is well worth reading. Here's a brief snippet:
As a news organization, all we have connecting us to our audience is our credibility. When we make mistakes, when we miss the point, when we fail to publish in a timely manner--each of these creates a little crack in that credibility. Once enough cracks form over time, the credibility is eroded and ultimately broken apart. At that point it doesn't matter how many orange dots you have swirling around your TV commercial or how intelligent you claim your information is. Once that bond is broken you're screwed.

Because Reuters is my company, there's a big part of me that hopes this incident has been blown out of proportion; that the blogs don't have the whole story. I fear that's not the case, however. The way it looks now is positively scandalous. And as a journalist it makes me almost physically ill to think about it.

I hope someone above me addresses the situation publicly, because lord knows not addressing it ain't working. Right now this incident is relatively contained (although it was the most viewed post on ZeroHedge as of Tuesday). But by next week, this will be all over the place--Romanesko, Drudge. From there it could get real ugly real fast.

And herein, I hope, lies a lesson for whomever killed Matt Goldstein's Steve Cohen story: When you make a decision like that, under those circumstances, the back story will get out. And the fallout from that back story will always, always be worse than the fallout from the story itself.
What strikes me as most interesting about this is that this Reuters post is still up. Reuters did not pull it. It does have an update link at the top to another blog that posted Reuters' denial (not even a Reuters page... which is also noteworthy). While I'm still curious about the decision to spike the story, I have to admit that the fact that a Reuters blogger was allowed to post this blog seriously questioning the integrity of Reuters management (his own bosses) lends at least some more credibility to Reuters itself. This is strengthened by the fact that the blog post has remained up as well.

Compare this to the stories that went around when the Associated Press was announcing its silly and totally useless attempt to DRM the news. At the time, I heard from a few different AP reporters who thought it was a ridiculous idea that made the Associated Press look bad -- but they weren't allowed to say that publicly, and had no real outlet to do so. Reuters and the AP compete pretty directly in the newswire business, and every time I compare them to one another Reuters seems to come out ahead in recognizing where the world is heading. If it is true that Reuters spiked the Cohen story, that would be quite damning and could make me question trusting Reuters, but how it's handled this news so far, and how it's reacted to its own blogger talking about the story is impressive.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 6:35am

    Wait for it....

    "and how it's reacted to its own blogger talking about the story is impressive."

    I hate to say this, but we should probably stay tuned and see how this plays out once major in-week media gets their hands on this.

    I wouldn't be shocked to see Reuters end up freaking out....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 6:44am

    An Execution! Yaay!

    Blogger firing in 3..2..1...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    a-dub (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 6:58am

    Your're fired!...Am I allowed to use that phrase?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2009 @ 7:39am

    @ A-DUB

    No you are not allowed as it has been copyrighted and trademarked.. Also the way it said has been Patented!A DMCA taken has been Sent to Tect Dirt about your post and your ISP has been notified.


    j/k
    rofl

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2009 @ 7:52am

    Re:

    yes you can say that because Your're is not the word Trump copyrighted. The proper word is YOU'RE FIRED. Opps, sorry Mr. Trump.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 7:57am

    Re: Re:

    "Opps, sorry Mr. Trump."

    Ha! Priceless....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 8:18am

    Things that make you go hmmmm .....

    Wonder what Reuters would do, and how much credibility the would loose, if this guy turns out to be the next Bernie Maddoff?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    farooge (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 8:20am

    Sad

    Mike said:
    >> ... "and how it's reacted to its own blogger talking about the story is impressive."

    It is truly impressive - while also being a sad commentary on the 'news' industry.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2009 @ 8:59am

    what the heck is a "spiked" story?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 10:20am

    Re: Things that make you go hmmmm .....

    Imagine the horror if they loosed so much credibility on the world.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 10:22am

    Re:

    I agree, he should have used a term other than journalism lingo, such as "suppressed", "killed", or "canceled".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Dec 28th, 2009 @ 11:36am

    Re:

    what the heck is a "spiked" story?

    Killed. It's how you describe a story that doesn't get published.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2009 @ 12:17pm

    Re: Things that make you go hmmmm .....

    Bernie Maddoff is such a looser

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This