by Mike Masnick
Mon, Sep 28th 2009 3:56am
This is incredible. Apparently the US prosecutor in the bogus Lori Drew case, which the judge finally tossed out in August is looking to appeal the decision. It's up to the US Solicitor General as to whether or not that actually happens, but just the fact that the prosecutor is still pushing this case is ridiculous. It was clearly an attempt to twist a law (unauthorized computer access) well beyond what it was meant to cover in an attempt to bring Drew up on charges because people didn't like the end result of what happened, even though she didn't break the law. The judge tossed it out because of how ridiculous it was. Also, apparently the cases that the prosecutor relied on in pushing the original case have now been rejected as well, making the argument even more tenuous. What a waste of time for a US prosecutor.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Says FBI Can Hack Computers Without A Warrant Because Computer Users Get Hacked All The Time
- DOJ Insists That Rule 41 Change Is Not Important, Nothing To See Here, Move On Annoying Privacy Activist People
- FBI Sends Computer Information Collected By Its Hacking Tools In Unencrypted Form Over The Open Internet
- FBI Agent Testifies That The Agency's Tor-Exploiting Malware Isn't Actually Malware
- Judge Says Defendant Has Right To Examine FBI's Hacking Tool While Stating FBI Has Right To Withhold Details