by Mike Masnick
Tue, Aug 25th 2009 7:22pm
It's good to see judges getting things right -- and more often than not, they're being both quick and smart when it comes to misguided lawsuits from plaintiffs against sites that host content, but don't publish it. The latest involves the owners of a bodybuilding forum website, bodybuilding.com, who were sued by a nutritional supplement maker, claiming that competitors had posted negative reviews on the site. But the judge tossed out the lawsuit against the forum operator using section 230. The supplement maker tried to argue that the forum owners had teamed up with the competitor in a conspiracy to say bad things about the supplement, but the judge didn't buy it. The only question was whether the website owners posted the content. They didn't. There's no case.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Lawyer's Association Asks New California Attorney General To Drop Its Abusive Prosecution Of Backpage
- Facebook Sued In Israel For Blocking All Links To Site Critical Of Facebook & Suggesting Site Was 'Unsafe'
- German Judge Fines Father Because He Didn't Tell His Kid Not To Engage In Piracy
- Court Says Google Has A First Amendment Right To Delist Competitor's 'Spammy' Content
- Prosecutors And Anti-Sex Trafficking Advocates Aren't Happy With The Government's Treatment Of Backpage