by Mike Masnick
Tue, Aug 25th 2009 7:22pm
It's good to see judges getting things right -- and more often than not, they're being both quick and smart when it comes to misguided lawsuits from plaintiffs against sites that host content, but don't publish it. The latest involves the owners of a bodybuilding forum website, bodybuilding.com, who were sued by a nutritional supplement maker, claiming that competitors had posted negative reviews on the site. But the judge tossed out the lawsuit against the forum operator using section 230. The supplement maker tried to argue that the forum owners had teamed up with the competitor in a conspiracy to say bad things about the supplement, but the judge didn't buy it. The only question was whether the website owners posted the content. They didn't. There's no case.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- German Court Says YouTube Isn't Liable For Infringement, But Wants A Notice-And-Staydown Process
- Huge Loss For Free Speech In Europe: Human Rights Court Says Sites Liable For User Comments
- Once Again, Just Because Someone Used Backpage.com For Trafficking, Doesn't Mean Backpage Is Liable
- Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood Insists His Emails With The MPAA Are Super Secret
- Phi Sigma Sigma Sorority Sues Member For Revealing Secret Handshake On Penny Arcade Forum