Another Good Section 230 Ruling: Forum Owner Not Liable For Posts

from the good-to-see dept

It’s good to see judges getting things right — and more often than not, they’re being both quick and smart when it comes to misguided lawsuits from plaintiffs against sites that host content, but don’t publish it. The latest involves the owners of a bodybuilding forum website, bodybuilding.com, who were sued by a nutritional supplement maker, claiming that competitors had posted negative reviews on the site. But the judge tossed out the lawsuit against the forum operator using section 230. The supplement maker tried to argue that the forum owners had teamed up with the competitor in a conspiracy to say bad things about the supplement, but the judge didn’t buy it. The only question was whether the website owners posted the content. They didn’t. There’s no case.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Another Good Section 230 Ruling: Forum Owner Not Liable For Posts”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
Jared (user link) says:

Dig a little

There are plenty of details; the entire case is available as a .pdf
Here are the highlights:
Syntrax Innovations said the website (bodybuilding.com) promoted libelous statements from competing companies which could be read by the public.

Section 230 states, basically, that no person or organization shall be held liable for content put forth by someone else.

It was in a forum, they didn’t post it, they are not responsible, case dismissed.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Dig a little

Sorry, but since IP is only stored in a simple database that can easily be modified, how is that proof?

I mean, gee, give me a few hours with a tape from and armed robbery and the right equipment, and I can make it look like Obama did it. WOuld it be real? Nope. But it you are only going to accept that, well…

At bare minimum, the forum should be required to provide what information they have on the OD so that they can say “this dude isn’t us”. Otherwise to me, SODDI in a pretty empty answer.

Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Dig a little

“Agreed. Burden of proof is on the accuser. I can say that Dark Helmet is in a massive conspiracy to slander and libel me out of business but without a bit of proof to back it up I’m just a crackpot who thinks Mr. Helmet is out to get me.”

Interesting that you speak of accusing me of libel in a post I hadn’t yet posted in, you dog beating, grandma humping, baby eater…

AC's long lost brother says:

Re: Re: Re: Dig a little

Read the ruling. Cornelius (the plaintiff) alleged that there was a conspiracy, not that bodybuilding.com actually posted the comments. also, the case got dismissed on a number of grounds including lack of jusridiction. But the part you might want to read is that the judge ruled that the plaintiff did not present any FACTUAL evidence, only a theory. The ruling also stated that the judge had to cinsider the evidence in the best light of the PLAINTIFF and even then the judge through it out.

So to put it in simple terms since you keep asking: the suing company didn’t provide enough for the judge to say “yes, this is sufficient to go to trial”. the burden of proof here was VERY low for the plaintiffs. all they had to show was that there was enough to go to trial, not enough to win.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...