by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jul 15th 2008 4:06pm
With the news out that Google and Viacom have come to an agreement to "anonymize" the data a judge ordered Google to hand over, it's worth remembering a simple, but important statement: there's no such thing as a truly anonymized dataset. While it may protect some users, it's still likely to reveal some users and what they surfed. Given all of this, it's still quite unclear why Viacom needs this data in the first place. The legal question is whether Google infringed on copyright. Why should Google's log files be necessary to determine that?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Supreme Court Won't Hear Oracle v. Google Case, Leaving APIs Copyrightable And Innovation At Risk
- Breaking: Self-Driving Cars Avoid Accident, Do Exactly What They Were Programmed To Do
- Researcher Headed To Australian Supreme Court In Attempt To Hold Google Responsible For Posts At Ripoff Reports [Updated]
- The Ridiculous Redactions The DOJ Required To Try To Hide The Details Of Its Google Gag Order
- Google Was Gagged For Four Years From Talking About Fighting The Wikileaks Investigation