by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jul 15th 2008 4:06pm
With the news out that Google and Viacom have come to an agreement to "anonymize" the data a judge ordered Google to hand over, it's worth remembering a simple, but important statement: there's no such thing as a truly anonymized dataset. While it may protect some users, it's still likely to reveal some users and what they surfed. Given all of this, it's still quite unclear why Viacom needs this data in the first place. The legal question is whether Google infringed on copyright. Why should Google's log files be necessary to determine that?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- DailyDirt: Computers Are Learning How To Play More Video Games, But They'll Never Appreciate A Good Game?
- Disappointing: Google Not Yet Requiring Phone Makers To Encrypt By Default
- President Obama Complains To China About Demanding Backdoors To Encryption... As His Administration Demands The Same Thing
- Court Doesn't Buy Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood's Argument: Puts His Google Demands On Hold
- Google Suddenly Realizes That Maybe It Doesn't Need To Ban Adult Content On Blogger