by Mike Masnick
Tue, May 6th 2008 4:11am
isoHunt, one of the BitTorrent tracker sites that the MPAA generated publicity for with a lawsuit a couple of years ago, has filed a response to the judge's request for more information on how BitTorrent and BitTorrent tracker sites work. The MPAA, of course, positioned isoHunt as a den of piracy. But isoHunt, following the lead of TorrentSpy, has pointed out to the judge that it's no different than a search engine, indexing the various BitTorrent files out there. isoHunt, itself, is never involved in copyright infringement and, of course, there are plenty of authorized BitTorrent trackers out there. It will be interesting to see a judge finally rule on this issue. TorrentSpy lost its case, but not over this issue. In that case, the guys at TorrentSpy destroyed evidence -- which is a huge no-no. Hopefully a judge recognizes why search engines shouldn't be blamed for infringement that results from the use of the website.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Senior Brazilian Court Says 'Right To Be Forgotten' Cannot Be Imposed On Search Engines
- MPAA: EFF Just Jealous It Doesn't Control Copyright Office Like Hollywood Does
- The Reason The Copyright Office Misrepresented Copyright Law To The FCC: Hollywood Told It To
- Anti-Piracy Operations Are Fabricating Links To Non-Existent Torrents In DMCA Notices
- France Still Thinks It Regulates Entire Internet, Fines Google For Not Making Right To Be Forgotten Global