by Mike Masnick
Tue, Feb 19th 2008 5:37pm
In a rather unfortunate ruling, the Supreme Court has decided to let an appeals court ruling stand, saying that the ACLU has no standing to bring a lawsuit over domestic wiretapping activities of the federal government. There's a bit of a catch-22 here. Neither the appeals court nor the Supremes are saying that the wiretapping is illegal. They're just saying that only those actually impacted by the wiretapping can bring suit -- which is tricky since the whole point is that there's no way for those being tapped to actually know they're being tapped. This would appear to be a rather ominous omission in the "checks and balances" our government is supposed to have.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Canadian Supreme Court Tightens Up Rules On Law Enforcement's Use Of Cell Tower Dumps
- And Of Course: Authors Guild Asks Supreme Court To Overturn Fair Use Ruling On Google Books
- DEA Loses Big Drug Case, Thanks To Illegal Wiretap Warrants Prosecutor Calls 'Procedural Errors'
- Supreme Court Again Makes It Clear: Companies Can Erode Your Legal Rights Via Mouse Print
- California Police Used Illegal Wiretap Warrants In Hundreds Of Drug Prosecutions