by Mike Masnick
Tue, Feb 19th 2008 5:37pm
In a rather unfortunate ruling, the Supreme Court has decided to let an appeals court ruling stand, saying that the ACLU has no standing to bring a lawsuit over domestic wiretapping activities of the federal government. There's a bit of a catch-22 here. Neither the appeals court nor the Supremes are saying that the wiretapping is illegal. They're just saying that only those actually impacted by the wiretapping can bring suit -- which is tricky since the whole point is that there's no way for those being tapped to actually know they're being tapped. This would appear to be a rather ominous omission in the "checks and balances" our government is supposed to have.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- California Police Used Illegal Wiretap Warrants In Hundreds Of Drug Prosecutions
- Supreme Court Examines The Sixth Amendment Ramifications Of Pre-Conviction Asset Seizures
- Supreme Court Turns Down Opportunity To Straighten Out Cell Site Location Information Mess
- Judge Again Says NSA Phone Records Program Is Unconstitutional; Orders NSA To Stop Collecting Phone Records Of Plaintiffs
- Court Dismisses Wikimedia's Lawsuit Over NSA Surveillance