by Mike Masnick
Wed, Sep 26th 2007 11:37am
For quite some time now, we've been pointing out how ridiculous it is that state after state after state passes "for the children" laws which clearly are unconstitutional. These laws are always thrown out by the courts. It's a total waste of taxpayer money, as the state needs to go to court to defend the law, only to have it thrown out (it's even worse when they go on to appeal). The politicians don't care. They just want to pass the law so they can show voters in their district that they're "protecting the children." Who cares if they're not actually protecting any children and actually really just wasting taxpayer money? The latest state to go through this process is Ohio -- and now reporters are finally starting to ask how much are these bogus laws costing taxpayers to defend in court? It probably won't stop politicians from passing these laws, but it's about time the press started asking this question directly to the politicians.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Court Points Out The Fourth Amendment Still Protects Public School Students From Illegal Searches
- Twitter's Excuse For Shutting Down Services That Highlight Deleted Politicians' Tweets Is Painfully Ridiculous
- DailyDirt: So You Want To Grow Your Own Food?
- Germany Says You Can't Sell Adult Ebooks Until After 10 PM
- And Another One Bites The Dust: Mass Surveillance Ruled Unconstitutional In Slovak Republic