by Mike Masnick
Tue, Aug 7th 2007 9:43am
Over and over and over and over and over and over again, state politicians have been passing laws that ban the sale of certain video games to children and every single time the laws are struck down as unconstitutional. Yet, local politicians keep proposing similar laws. Why? Because it gives them a talking point for the next election and making it look like they're "protecting the children" (even if the law does no such thing). However, what they're really doing is wasting taxpayer money, because every time one of these unconstitutional laws is passed, the state has to go to court to defend it, only to find it thrown out again. The latest state to waste taxpayer money over this? My home state of California, who has now had its law thrown out as unconstitutional, just like all the rest. Let's make this clear: more than ten states have passed these laws and not a single one has been found to be constitutional. Any politician passing such a law these days knows that they're wasting taxpayer money on a law that will undoubtedly be found unconstitutional -- and yet they do it anyway. What does that say about the politicians pushing such legislation?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Microsoft Advertises The Witcher 3 On Xbox With Footage From The PC Version; Fans Not Fooled
- How The DMCA And Anti-Piracy Measures Conspire To Keep Video Games In Their Cultural Place
- MMA Fighter Upset Over Possible Homage In Mortal Kombat
- Google Rejects Postal For Google Play Store Due To Violence; GTA Games Still Available For Purchase
- Modders Un-Region-Restricting Halo Online Undeterred By Microsoft DMCA