BellSouth Reserves The Right To Port Block
from the so-don't-piss-them-off dept
How quickly things change. For years, US telcos have been claimed that there was no need at all for network neutrality regulations, because they would never (never, ever, we promise!) block usage of their connections. They even pointed out that, if they did start blocking stuff, it would be a publicity nightmare and they’d probably lose customers over it. However, since that time, a few things have changed. High bandwidth apps have become more popular and a few service providers have been able to get away with blocking competitive applications. On top of that, new tools are coming out that will make it easier than ever for service providers to block or simply degrade applications like VoIP. So is it any surprise to see Broadband Reports point out that BellSouth refuses to promise network neutrality and reserves the right to block whatever they want to? Of course, this wouldn’t be much of a problem if there were real competition in the broadband space, but the same FCC that won’t fully mandate network neutrality has determined that a duopoly is enough competition for everyone.
Comments on “BellSouth Reserves The Right To Port Block”
Doupoly
Republican vs. Democrat?
Pepsi vs. Coke?
What, you’re saying that doesn’t work??!?! Blasphemy!
Wireless Mesh Communities
Yet one more reason for Wireless Mesh Communities… In fact it is Manifest Destiny… shore to shore wireless mesh. We use Voip…or what the hell ever else we want on the unowned air waves between us all.
Re: Wireless Mesh Communities
Damn right.
No Subject Given
seems more or less they are saying they might block the high-bandwidth apps eventually since it is eating up all their bandwidth and ruining their pricing model
No Subject Given
They already block P2P. I tried every single P2P client I could find and every single one was blocked. As soon as I switched to Comcast, they all worked fine.
I’ll never use a BellSouth product again because of this. Way to go, BellSouth.
No Subject Given
As long as Bellsouth makes the consumer aware of these limitations and restrictions prior to contracting service, it seems fair enough to me. If I had already signed a contract and they sprung this on me mid-stream, I’d be raising hell. I think the lesson here is simple… Bellsouth SUX!
Re: No Subject Given
It is NOT “fair enough” when where you live offers
no choice but BS! Every DSL provider in my area
is purchasing service through BS, and on BS’s
terms.
Hence, nothing is fair about it! On the other
point, you’re correct: BELLSOUTH SUX!…and are
Full of S.
FYI: If you host a website at home, Bellsouth has begun blocking Port 80 to other customers within their network as of sometime late 2005-early 2006.
Network Neutrality
I sent the email below to Bellsouth. Perhaps some other Bellsouth customers could do something similar.
===BEGIN===
I have been a relatively satisfied Bellsouth customer for many years. I have not always been satisfied with the service, but have always, always, found the people at Bellsouth to be sincere and honest in their dealings with me and I’ve believe they were doing their best to resolve my issues. Bellsouth is an enormous organization and I have seen it sometimes struggle against itself to accomplish what seemed to me to be a small task. But the Bellsouth people take on the burden of that struggle and get the job done.
I said all that to say this. While I am not just a customer of Bellsouth, I am a fan. I will quit you like a bad habit, if ever I discover proof of blocked ports.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051026/1616253_F.shtml
This is akin to turning of my phone’s access to Michigan or all GTE customers. It would completely unacceptable. If there is a need to charge a small fee to the consumer to offset costs of providing that service, I would find that distasteful. However, I understand the need to maintain and improve services and resources. And, there is nothing wrong with a little profit. But, if you wish to maintain me as a customer, you will not block ports (and/or services) or you will give me the option to pay for them.
Respectfully,
George Hogge
George@Hogge.com
===END===
Re: Network Neutrality
Nice letter. Just be sure to spell check and have someone proof read your letter. The letter has some glaring mistakes and no one is going to take you seriously if you don’t us correct grammar.
Re: Re: Network Neutrality
Network Neutrality
“Just be sure to spell check and have someone read your letter.”
That’s a good point. But Ironically, in your post about correct spelling and grammar you forgot the “e” in “use” in the last sentence, and said, “…if you don’t us correct grammar.”
😉