Is There A Blurry Line Between Ads And Content?

from the it's-about-time dept

For years, as it became clear that the concept of the captive audience was dying, some have been banging the drum, trying to convince the advertising industry that just trying to get more intrusive and annoying was a very bad idea. The more obvious solution was to recognize that ads are content by themselves -- and, perhaps more importantly, content is advertising, though it's not always immediately clear what for. If the content/advertising is interesting and entertaining people will actually seek it out, which has to be a lot more effective as advertising than annoying the crap out of people. With this as background, it would seem obvious that the advertising industry might look to the existing entertainment industry with a plan to support the creation of new music and movies with a sponsorship twist. To some extent, this is exactly what's happening in China, where consumer products are looking to famous musicians to act as sponsors -- and that pays for the new music more than CD sales. However, in the US, so far, the "advertising as content" meme is starting to worry those who fear that there's a real risk in "blurring the line" -- especially when it comes to news content. While it's an interesting debate, to some extent it's missing the point. It's only looking at things from the "ads are content" viewpoint, rather than the "content is an advertisement" angle. When you realize both are true, it becomes a little harder to figure out what line is blurring in the first place. You read Techdirt because you like the content (hopefully!). However, it also acts as an advertisement for our business. Is that "blurring the line?" Obviously, misleading or deceitful promotions are a problem -- but, as plenty of people seem to be noticing these days, it's increasingly difficult to hide dishonesty when everyone has an easily accessible megaphone. So, perhaps a little line blurring isn't really all that problematic -- since it's not clear that line was ever really there in the first place.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.