Todd Blanche Pinky Swears The $1.8 Billion J6 Slush Fund Is Dead, But Won’t Sign Anything Saying That
from the j6ers-still-expect-to-get-paid dept
There were some rumors earlier this week that, as it was facing a lot of pushback in court, in the media, and even among (a few) fellow Republicans in Congress, Donald Trump was going to drop his blatantly unconstitutional, illegal, and corrupt $1.776 billion slush fund for MAGA insurrectionists. And now it’s… sorta officially dead… but not really.
Testifying before Congress, Acting Attorney General and full-time Trump toady, told representatives “we are not moving forward with the weaponization fund.”
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said Tuesday that the Trump administration is scrapping plans to create a $1.8 billion fund meant to compensate allies of the Republican president after widespread political backlash and setbacks in the courts.
“We are not moving forward with the fund, period,” Blanche said.
But if you watch the actual video, it’s not quite so concrete:
As Rep. Grace Meng asks for Blanche to put it into writing that the fund is not moving forward, Blanche declines to do so. Furthermore, he refuses to say if the equally corrupt, illegal, and problematic deal to not have the IRS audit the president and his family is also going away (meaning that it’s not going away). Of course, he also lies and claims that the settlement is between “the IRS” and Trump, which is simply incorrect. The IRS never signed the agreement. It was done by Blanche and the DOJ. He also tries to (falsely) claim that the audit immunity is “not blanket immunity,” which is just false:
As Rep. DeLauro reads, Blanche’s order (again, not an official “settlement with the IRS despite Blanche’s false claims) gives very clear blanket immunity to Donald Trump, his family, and his businesses:
The United States RELEASES, WAIVES, ACQUITS, and FOREVER DISCHARGES each of the Plaintiffs from, and is hereby FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED from prosecuting or pursuing, any and all claims, counterclaims, causes of action, appeals, or requests for any relief, including injunctive relief, monetary relief, damages, examinations or similar or related reviews, appeals, debt relief, costs, attorney’s fees, expenses, and/or interest, whether presently known or unknown, that as of the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement-have been or could have been asserted by Defendants against any of the Plaintiffs or related or affiliated individuals (including, without limitation, family or others filing jointly), or parties including trusts, parent, sister, or related companies, affiliates, and subsidiaries, by reason of, with respect to, in connection with, or which arise out of (1) any matters that were raised or could have been raised in the Case or the Pending Agency Claims; (2) Lawfare and/or Weaponization; or (3) any matters currently pending or that could be pending (including tax returns filed before the Effective Date) before Defendants or other agencies or departments.
That is blanket immunity. Full stop.
But here’s the tell: if Blanche’s “we are not moving forward, period” were actually true, you’d expect the people who stood to benefit to be disappointed. They’re not. January 6th insurrectionists, including Proud Boys Leader Enrique Tarrio — convicted of seditious conspiracy and later pardoned by Trump — still seem to think they’re going to cash in. Tarrio has been saying he deserves tens of millions of dollars, and rather than expressing any disappointment at Blanche’s testimony, he’s explaining why this is actually good news for him, because it means he can get more money from the US government with less oversight.
If you can’t see that, it’s Tarrio texting reporter Liz Landers:
This isn’t an abandonment. They simply state they’re going to wait two weeks… I believe even if this fund is killed in courts or at a congressional level, the President will find a way… They can just settle the tort claims and lawsuits. That has no judicial review or congressional oversight. And it would mean a lot more money in compensation.
Tarrio’s theory — and likely shared by other J6ers — is that they sue the US government, Trump and Blanche agree to “settle,” and millions of taxpayer dollars flow out through the existing Judgment Fund (the same pot the anti-weaponization fund was drawing from) with zero oversight and zero congressional approval.
And he might not be wrong.
It’s also why a competent Congress would step in and shut all of this down. If we had a competent Congress. Which we don’t.
At some point there needs to be a real reckoning with how broken the system already is — that Trump and Blanche got this far is itself an indictment of how bad things are.
Filed Under: anti-weaponization fund, corruption, donald trump, irs, january 6th, todd blanche
Techdirt is off for the holiday! We'll be back with our regular posts this weekend.


Comments on “Todd Blanche Pinky Swears The $1.8 Billion J6 Slush Fund Is Dead, But Won’t Sign Anything Saying That”
Pardons
This is a man who expects to get a pardon.
Re:
Unless Trump dies in office or loses office to either impeachment or the 25th Amendment, he’s going to pardon everyone he can at the end of his term. He knows that if he doesn’t, he’s giving everyone all the more reason to turn on him once he’s out of office.
Re: Re:
Certainly true, but: he can only pardon federal crimes. Every state attorney should be queueing up indictments and getting ready to drop them all at once.
“We are not moving forward with the fund, period.” “We are however, moving forward with reparation payments.”
They’re playing for the Court
Earlier this week (IIRC) a court told them to not move forward with the fund. It might seem surprising, but maybe they’re just waiting for that court ruling to be overridden on appeal. Presumably it’s taking some time for the appeals courts to go through all of the “cancel what the lower court said” requests from the Administration, but after that’s happened here they expect to start moving forward with this fund again.
What, me cynical?
I think you’re using Wikipedia inappropriately as a source.
Fourteen defendants had their sentences commuted – meaning they will be released, but their convictions will remain on the record – include Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes.
The bbc is usually a lot more accurate than Wikipedia.
Re:
The Trump DOJ is now in the process or has completed the process of retroactively dismissing those cases, “in the interests of justice” , meaning those convictions will be expunged from the record.
Re:
Their convictions won’t remain on the record, because on top of the commutations, the DOJ is moving to retroactively dismiss the charges, against those people, thus erasing the convictions.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Obama did the same thing.
Please be quiet.
It’s not that you’re retarded, it’s that you’re retarded on purpose.
Re:
This person is trolling. They keep claiming this even though it’s false. It’s not just false, it’s demonstrably so false that even extreme partisan MAGA GOP folks are saying it’s false.
I am just copy/pasting what I wrote the last time this troll made this false statement, solely to educate people on why it’s false. This troll is here to troll not to learn or educate.
Original comment:
“This is almost exactly the same as what Obama did”
It’s not. If this troll could read, we actually already addressed this in our earlier post, citing not some “leftist activist” but rather Ed Whelan, one of the most right wing conservative legal commentators out there, who pointed out all of the many (important) ways in which this was entirely different from what Obama did.
As Whelan noted, the Keepseagle settlement was approved by a court, which makes all the difference in the world. This one was not. Second, the Keepseagle settlement had very strict restrictions on who could make a claim on the fund, and what evidence you needed to present to be eligible for a claim. This fund does not have that.
So no, any actual lawyer will tell you this is extraordinarily different than the Keepseagle fund (which is what the troll is falsely suggesting is similar to this).
This is today’s lesson in “how to debunk bullshit MAGA talking points.”
I am sure the troll will return with insults and goalpost moving (it’s all they can do) but it won’t make them any less full of shit.
Re:
Your every accusation a confession.
Re:
Projecting Much?
Re:
As has been stated already, even if Obama had actually, factually done the same thing (he didn’t), it still wouldn’t be morally or legally right.
If the best defense you can raise is “other people who I think are bad also did this bad thing,” you’re not really selling it well.
It also shows how much of a goddamn coward you are. Own it. You’re in favor of corruption. Lying about an obvious fact like this just makes you look weak and sycophantic. Lick that boot. Show the dear leader your belly.
Re:
If he had you idiots wouldn’t have shut up about it for the past decade plus, just like Solyndra, iffy preachers and Hillary’s emails. Funny how democrats have always done this indefensible thing Trump has done the second you realised none of the other defenses you have tried have worked, you just forgot to mention it, that’s all.
Re:
It’s not that you’re retarded, it’s that you’re retarded on purpose.
Self-awareness – get yourself some, Shitmouth.
Re:
Please be quiet.
No.
Don't harp on Toadie Blanche
He has made perfectly clear previously that he is going to do whatever Trump ask of him, no questions asked. He literally said
The person you need to get something in writing from is Donald Trump, and that will only get you as far as you can throw Trump with one hand. He wasn’t keeping his word even before he perverted the Department of Justice.
Or should that now be called the Department of Revenge to better reflect its changed focus, akin to how the Department of Defense has been renamed to Department of War to make clear that the U.S. will attack anywhere militarilty where they hope to make a gain?
They’ve already gone there with Babbit’s Family, Flynn, and Alex Berenson. And they’ve moved to retroactively dismiss the cases, against the Tarrio and the other Proud Boys.
i don’t see, Tarrio, -not- suing..
So unless a judge, dismisses the case at the outset, of course they’ll settle.
The solution here, is to then for the police and others injured on J6, to sue their pants off.
So, this fund won’t be 1.8 billion shared among thousands people but few millions that will directly go into Trump’s pocket?
I’m pretty sure that what was planned from the start.
You’ll never get it in writing, that this scheme was shut down. Because the near $1.8B has already been allocated to tRump and/or his spawn. No-one else would have seen a penny either way.
What these morons are missing, forgetting, or glossing over is the fact of the other little part of this so called “settlement”: Trump and his spawn will be immune from any prosecution from the IRS for fraud past, present, or future.
They’re still going to give him a “Get out of Jail free” card, and hand wave the money (which most likely has already disappeared into a Trump pocket).
You’ll never get it in writing, that this scheme was shut down. Because the near $1.8B has already been allocated to tRump and/or his spawn. No-one else would have seen a penny either way.
What these morons are missing, forgetting, or glossing over is the fact of the other little part of this so called “settlement”: Trump and his spawn will be immune from any prosecution from the IRS for fraud past, present, or future.
They’re still going to give him a “Get out of Jail free” card, and hand wave the money (which most likely has already disappeared into a Trump pocket).
Never in writing
No-one will ever get anything in writing for the $1.8B, because it’s already been re-allocated into tRump’s or his fail sons pockets. No-One else was ever going to see a penny of those funds anyway (just like we’ll never get redress from tRumps failed tariff war).
What everyone is missing is the omitted statement that tRump and co. are to be immune from prosecution by the IRS for any financial fraud: past, present and future. That is what REALLY pisses me off!
Re:
Guess the site was having difficulties with what I was initially posting (6:02 timestamp). As I still didn’t see the initial comment post after 7:30. Thus a triple post, apologies everyone.
Re: Re:
The site’s been awfully weird the past couple of days, too. Between longer delays in being able to reach the site, constant checking of browser security or whatever, and comments not going through correctly, something’s been really off this week.
Re: Re: Re:
Perhaps some censorious asshat is trying to DOS TD or something because one of the articles hurt their fee-fee’s. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if that was the case.
Re: Re: Re:
Biden did it.
Re: Re: Re:2
But, but, but, Obama, Benghazi, Biden, Clinton, buttery males (any other inane deflection MAGAt’s can put on repeat).
Librarians showed that it is easy to stand up to him
Need to call in the Library of Congress door guards who wouldn’t let Blanche into their building, so he went away.
Congress, your librarians could do it. You can, too. Stand up to Blanche!
Impeach his whole cabinet. Yhey are all incompetent, corrupt, and unfit to be in government.