Palantir Continues To Burnish Its Evil Tech Overlord Reputation By Kicking Journalists Out Of A Tech Conference
from the beat-it,-data-points dept
Palantir has never had a great reputation. Even before it teamed up with Trump to create a massive, abusable database of American residents’ information, it was working with forward-looking cop shops, that wanted similar massive, abusable databases of their own, even if those were limited to surveilling people in their own jurisdictions.
The company is never going to gather much praise from the press, so it will have to content itself with counting the billions it’s bringing in from government contracts. Oh, and chasing journalists it doesn’t like out of tech conferences that are otherwise open to the public. Here’s Caroline Haskins, reporting for Wired about four ejections made by Palantir employees, one of which was her own.
Prior to being kicked out of Palantir’s booth, the WIRED journalist, who is also the author of this article, was taking photos, videos, and written notes during software demos of Palantir FedStart partners, which use the company’s cloud systems to get certified for government work. The booth’s walls had phrases like “REAWAKEN THE GIANT” and “DON’T GIVE UP THE SHIP!” printed on the outside. When the reporter briefly stepped away from the booth and attempted to re-enter, she was stopped by Eliano Younes, Palantir’s head of strategic engagement, who said that WIRED was not allowed to be there. The reporter asked why, and Younes repeated himself, adding that if WIRED tried to return, he would call the police.
Younes has since tried to justify his actions. A lengthy XTwitter screed claims the journalists have only themselves to blame for their ejections because [scrolls scrolls scrolls scrolls] their coverage of Palantir wasn’t flattering enough and/or this one time a reporter was rude during a press conference.
Apparently this is all the justification Younes needed to make Palantir look even more thin-skinned and evil than it already appears to be. First, Younes personally went after Haskins. Then he sent consecutive sets of goons to toss out three other tech reporters.
Later that day, Palantir had conference security remove at least three other journalists—Jack Poulson, writer of the All-Source Intelligence Substack; Max Blumenthal, who writes and publishes The Grayzone; and Jessica Le Masurier, a reporter at France 24—from the conference hall, Poulson says. The reporters were later able to reenter the hall, Poulson adds.
To be fair to the security guards, they weren’t actually goons. I mean, they did eject the reporters but apparently allowed them back in after a “friendly” conversation with the three ejectees, asking them only to “respect any requests from attendees” (but, importantly, not vendors) to stop filming them.
Younes also took time to rebut a claim no one ever made during his extended follow-up to his ejections of multiple reporters from an open-to-the-public tech expo.
On Tuesday, Palantir posted on X claiming the Times article was “blatantly untrue” and said that the company “never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans.” The Times article did not claim that Palantir buys or collects its own data, though it’s a common misconception that the company does so.
Much like other tech companies that have made themselves pariahs, denying claims no one made and ejecting reporters you don’t like isn’t going to do anything to alter public perception… at least not in the direction Palantir would prefer. If this is the stance Palantir wants to take in response to critical reporting, it’s never going to be the swaggering badass it thinks it is. It will just be another petulant tech company that’s too thin-skinned to absorb the criticism its questionable actions will always generate.
Filed Under: caroline haskins, jack poulson, jessica le masurier, max blumenthal, trump administration
Companies: palantir


Comments on “Palantir Continues To Burnish Its Evil Tech Overlord Reputation By Kicking Journalists Out Of A Tech Conference”
Trump’s move to contract Palantir to build a huge database violates the law. There are extensive rules, mandated by Congress, that require competitive bidding in response to a formal RFP. But I suppose everyone/anyone who could prosecute this has already been neutered…
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Bomb them to death
we are gonna plough 18 wheelers filled with napalm into your conference.
Re: We know you're FBI
We see you, FBI. We’re not falling for it.
Re: Re:
Given the current low-rent leadership, it actually wouldn’t surprise me to find out this was an FBI ruse.
Re: Re: Re:
Not so much a ruse as an attempt to make homegrown terrorists, as it’s done before.
Re:
That’s nice Herman
Is Palantir the clearest example of the “Don’t Create the Torment Nexus” joke?
Like…y’all know the reason people think you’re the bad guys and you’re spying on everybody is that you named your company after a thing the bad guys used to spy on everybody, right?
Well, I mean, one of the reasons.
Re:
i have personally enjoyed the “good people” who have left Palantir because somehow what the company is doing for the current administration is “too evil”. But all the stuff beside that was apparently fine. Glad to know some people have a limit, i guess?
Re: It really is an example of the One Ring
I forget if I was listening to a segment on J. D. Vance or Peter Thiel on Behind the Bastards but the story talked about taking the code used to track a Baltic scam fleecing Paypal and generalizing it to make Palentir, what is a super-sophisticated crazy board (🧶📌📇). And while it was in development, it was causing problems since it allowed the testers to easily track who in the program was engaging with whom (including love triangles and sexual promiscuity) which in turn caused political strive in the development team.
I’m reminded of the Target advertising algo that figured out women who switch to unscented beauty products are pregnant, and would start sending baby-product ads to women before they knew, which got creepy fast.
Re: Re:
Not least because not all of those women would have been pregnant, but rather switched due to a topical allergy.
Re: Re:
What made them switch in the first place?
Sure you will be reporting on this.
But members of congress are being attacked, arrested and kicked out as well.
The republican party has declared any dissenters as an enemy.
Re: The hope is that they're acting too fast.
When the German Sicherheitsdienst detected dissenters (the old fashioned way, using blackmail to recruit informants and spies) they’d wait a while before sabotaging their career, (or just sabotaging their car) and this took enough time so as to draw less attention to the opposition party’s run of bad luck.
By the time dissenters and people with untoward opinions were being arrested, the water was way too hot for frogs, and the public was used to arrests of alleged enemies of the public. (And they did not speak for they were not one of those people.)
In the US, today, our coup d’etat participants are so eager to get on with political arrests and targeting those who might obstruct the president’s agenda (Obstructing a political agenda is not illegal in any state) that it’s caused alarm even from officials and media agencies that would otherwise be glad to see the regime change, but not like this.
It appears a lot of folks who are way into doing the fascism are sickened when they see it up close. Heck even Eichmann and Heydrich got queasy.
I disagree. This type of petulant posturing will make it EXACTLY the swaggering badass it thinks it is. The type that’s really popular with fascist-leaning dictatorship wannabes.
It won’t, however, make it welcome in the tech circles it so covetously desires to rule.