RFK Jr.’s MAHA Report Cites Studies That Don’t Seem To Exist, Misinterprets Others
from the par-for-the-course dept
We recently talked about Donald Trump’s foray into medicine when he declared, sans any actual evidence of course, that autism cannot possibly be caused by anything other than some external source. It was an admittedly odd stance to take for someone who seems to care so deeply about genetics in other areas, but Donald Trump being an inconsistent mess is not remotely newsworthy. The comments were made during a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) event that unveiled RFK Jr.’s “Make America Healthy Again” MAHA report on American health. That report, which RFK Jr. touted as a result of “gold standard” science, identified four major causes of deficiencies in health in America.
The MAHA Commission event unveiled the group’s new report, which pointed to four key factors it says are hurting U.S. children: ultraprocessed foods, environmental chemicals, digital behavior and “overmedicalization.” The report identifies pesticides and other chemicals as potentially having harmful health impacts, but it stops short of recommending actions to limit them.
And, hey, I can get on board with some of that. Though I’ve made a habit of righteously slapping around Kennedy and his HHS Department as of late, not every idea the man has is completely stupid. Do ultra-processed foods probably suck for our health? I can imagine that being the case. Chemicals in our environment and/or food? Sure, that sounds like something worth studying. Digital behavior issues and the vague reference to “overmedicalization” have my spidey-sense tingling, I will admit, but neither strike me as particularly unworthy of attention at first glance.
But the problem is that when you tout your report as “gold standard” medicine and then I later learn that this report’s citations read like an AI hallucination, well, now I have to question everything once more.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says his “Make America Healthy Again” Commission report harnesses “gold-standard” science, citing more than 500 studies and other sources to back up its claims. Those citations, though, are rife with errors, from broken links to misstated conclusions.
Seven of the cited sources don’t appear to exist at all.
The post over at NOTUS goes into details. The broken links are probably just a result of human error, I suppose. The misinterpretations of other studies could be the result of, well, flat incompetence. But the studies and citations within specific papers and journals that don’t appear to exist? Someone is either flat out lying in this report, or else it was constructed with the help of AI. It’s not like we haven’t seen that sort of thing in the academic and legal realms before.
Katherine Keyes is one author of a supposed study the MAHA report referenced.
Epidemiologist Katherine Keyes is listed in the MAHA report as the first author of a study on anxiety in adolescents. When NOTUS reached out to her this week, she was surprised to hear of the citation. She does study mental health and substance use, she said. But she didn’t write the paper listed.
“The paper cited is not a real paper that I or my colleagues were involved with,” Keyes told NOTUS via email. “We’ve certainly done research on this topic, but did not publish a paper in JAMA Pediatrics on this topic with that co-author group, or with that title.”
It’s not clear that anyone wrote the study cited in the MAHA report. The citation refers to a study titled, “Changes in mental health and substance abuse among US adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic,” along with a nonfunctional link to the study’s digital object identifier. While the citation claims that the study appeared in the 12th issue of the 176th edition of the journal JAMA Pediatrics, that issue didn’t include a study with that title.
Again, I cannot say for sure that AI was used in this report, but it has all the hallmarks of your typical AI hallucination, where it attempts to build a plausible response to a prompt based on whatever datapoints it can find on the internet. For instance, Keyes does study topics such as in the fictional citation. And Keyes has in fact published work within JAMA Pediatrics. But the specifics here appear to be completely fabricated.
She’s not alone.
A section describing the “corporate capture of media” highlights two studies that it says are “broadly illustrative” of how a rise in direct-to-consumer drug advertisements has led to more prescriptions being written for ADHD medications and antidepressants for kids.
Those articles don’t appear in the table of contents for the journals listed in their citations. A spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, where psychiatric researcher Robert L. Findling currently teaches, confirmed to NOTUS that he never authored such an article. The author of the first study doesn’t appear to be a real ADHD researcher at all — at least, not one with a Google Scholar profile.
In another section titled, “American Children are on Too Much Medicine – A Recent and Emerging Crisis,” the report claims that 25% to 40% of mild cases of asthma are overprescribed. But searching Google for the exact title of the paper it cites to back up that figure — “Overprescribing of oral corticosteroids for children with asthma” — leads to only one result: the MAHA report.
There is more, with cited authors confirming to NOTUS that they never authored the studies or articles in other citations. In other cases, the report simply takes small, targeted studies and broadens them to become nationwide evidence of the very theories Kennedy has been pushing for years and years.
Can we confirm for sure that someone, or multiple someones, used generative AI to produce this report? No, we can’t, but I say that with as much of a literary wink as I can muster through the written word.
But even if that ends up not being the case, a report full of fictionalized and misinterpreted scientific studies is many things, but it sure as shit is not “gold standard science.”
Filed Under: ai, hallucinations, maha, research, rfk jr., science


Comments on “RFK Jr.’s MAHA Report Cites Studies That Don’t Seem To Exist, Misinterprets Others”
I’m sure they’re getting their information from Q.
Make who healthy again?
Leave the children out of it, first let’s look into the damage ‘digital behaviour’ has done to ageing Republicans.
Re:
(And the overmedicalisation of Elon Musk, while we’re at it)
The saddest irony of the Trump HHS is that we’re all going to have worse health because of RFK’s untreated medical issues.
Re:
Ain’t no treatment for malignant narciccism brought on by generational wealth and privilege. All you can do is prevent the next RFL by upping the inheritance taxes to limit generational wealth and banning colleges from giving a leg up to mediocre white kids because of their family ties.
Re: Re:
Sure there is. We’re just not allowed to talk about it.
Re: Re:
I mean, yeah, there is, and he hasn’t gotten it.
Of course the report doesn’t suggest any action on the issues it identifies. To crack down on ultraprocessed food, they’d have to crack down on massive US corporations and industries, and we know how the current administration feels about industry regulation.
Re:
They love using it as punishment against companies that don’t kiss their ass enough or employ too many Black people?
Re: Re:
That, and they won’t use it against companies that paid them a lot of money.
Re: Re: Re:
I wouldn’t count on their keeping up their end of that or any bargain.
He is not inconsistent. The nice things that happen to you are your own achievement, and the non-nice things that happen are someone else’s fault. Receiving praise is justified, getting criticism is unfair.
It’s the narcissist’s consistency.
Something, something Aryans. (It’s not easy being orange.)
Stop Oil
If he really cared about the health of children he would be transitioning away from fossil fuels asap. The science on climate change is gold standard.
What are the odds chat GPT was asked to write something that sounds scientific that calls in to question all the things RFK wants to blame for disease rather than decades of scientific consensus?
Re:
Well, I recently found out that Jonathan Cohler, along with other crackpots, had Grok write a “scientific” article, “debunking” man-made climate change.
So I would say the odds are very good that the current NHS used ChatGPT to make up shit they can attack, in order to make it seem like they’re doing something to improve the health of the US.
Re: Re:
No bet. This was 100% done via regurgitation engine.
This is like playing air guitar and it being out of tune.
RFK: AI, generate 500 studies related to children harms.
AI: Here you are, 500 studies. (I’m just an AI. Please check critical facts.)
RFK: Now, AI, generate 500 means to fight them.
AI: Sorry, you’ve reached your free plan limit. Please try next month.
RFK: Damn! But it’s okay, it should be enough.
As an asthmatic, that’s not something you want to fuck with. Ever. These stupid ass lies of his are literally going to get people killed. The dumb, worm brained pigfucker.
As a Patron of Medical experiments
I was to young to ask the right Questions.
As an Adult, I can try to find, as time would have it, SOME ONE who knows more then I DO.
Prefer BEFORE they stick the needle in me.
There are to many that would not regurgitate, Any of the Accumulated assorted rigmarole, they have learn in the last Bunch of years.
Not only is AI wrecking the planet by using exorbitant amounts of water and electricity, it’s also making things so worse by giving stupid and evil people the tools to justify their evil stupidity.
Ultra processed foods not all bad
We need to be careful when calling out Ultra Processed Foods. There are UPFs with poor nutritional profiles, such as soft drinks, ultraprocessed meats, sweets, and chips.
In contrast, there are also UPFs foods with healthy nutritional profiles such as infant formulas, gluten-free foods, plant-based drinks, whole-grain bread, tofu, vegetable spreads, yogurt, high-quality frozen meals, and sauerkraut.
Re:
There’s also a fundamental refusal to recognise the role many serve as disability aids. And I am not just talking about the convenience. There are, for example, MANY staple healthy foodstuffs which are on my list of absolute no-go zones for consumption as they massively trigger my IBS. Without processed foods making up the difference with refined products my digestive system can process without giving me 36 hours of lying in bed doubled up in agony, I’d have an extremely hard time getting a healthy nutritional intake.
Who is in charge?
And who would sign off on a report that would be so incredibly scrutinized but so poorly edited?
Re:
People who know they will face no repercussions for this action, or any action. Standard for the ghouls brought in to service the Cabinet Of Horrors and other MAGA functionaries.