Florida Man Wants $2 Million From Rockstar Over Parody Appearance In GTA6 Trailer

from the and-here-we-go dept

The folks behind the Grand Theft Auto franchise are certainly no strangers to lawsuits and complaints over publicity rights issues. GTA5 famously found the publishers of the game in court defending itself against the likes of Lindsay Lohan and Karen Gravano, ultimately winning both cases. Anyone familiar with the GTA franchise will have a sense of what is going on here. The series makes a regular habit of creating parodies of whatever is in the pop culture lexicon at the time of the game, with nods, but not faithful recreations, towards real life personas. In fact, most often, GTA will take multiple cultural references and mash them together as parody and off-color commentary on whatever it is parodying. All of that, of course, is speech protected by the First Amendment.

Rockstar’s latest iteration of its opus franchise is due to come out soon. A trailer for the game was released recently, showing off some impressive visuals within the game, as well as several examples of the exact cultural references described above. One of those was a nod to an individual known as the “Florida Joker,” who began making noise on social media about wanting to be paid millions of dollars as a result of the homage.

A Florida man is calling on Rockstar Games to pay him $2 million for showing literally one second of a character who looks like him in the reveal trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6. Lawrence Sullivan, AKA “Florida Joker,” accused the studio of stealing his likeness in his latest TikTok video. But a Red Dead Redemption 2 voice actor wasn’t having it.

Sullivan, who got his face tattooed to resemble Jared Leto’s version of the Joker following the Batman villain’s appearance in 2016’s Suicide Squad, has been trying to monetize his recent flicker in the limelight. “Let’s talk,” he said in a public call to Rockstar after parodies of him and other viral social media figures appeared in GTA 6’s long-awaited first trailer.

This is extremely unlikely to go anywhere. As in the previous cases, what Rockstar is doing here is purely parodying a pop culture figure. What it is not doing is creating a faithful reproduction of Sullivan. Just having your face tattooed as a skinny guy isn’t enough to qualify as reproducing the personage of an internet sensation. As in the Lohan and Gravano situations, there are obvious nods to Sullivan and several internet memes in which he is featured, but that is not all that the character in the game is, based on the trailer.

Parody is a thing and it is protected speech. Rockstar has established a reputation for itself in this game series in which it parodies the current culture as a method for commenting on it humorously. And, as voice actor Roger Clark noted, its lawyers have been well-attuned to what lines can be crossed and what cannot.

One person who seems to think Sullivan has no reason to complain is Roger Clark, the voice actor behind Red Dead Redemption 2’s protagonist, Arthur Morgan. “[Rockstar Games is] lawyered up, man,” he said in his own TikTok video, according to PC Gamer. “They know exactly what they can and cannot get away with. If I were you, I would use the notoriety they just threw your way to your advantage. Capitalize on it somehow. You ain’t getting a job at Home Depot with that face.”

Disparaging comments aside, Clark is exactly right. The lawyers will have already vetted the content of the game to make sure it won’t run afoul of accusations just like this. And, to add, Clark is spot on that Sullivan ought to be using the homage as a way to boost his own notoriety and, perhaps, ability to monetize his persona.

I wouldn’t expect a lawsuit to be filed in this case as a result of all of this, but I’ve been surprised in the past.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: rockstar games

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Florida Man Wants $2 Million From Rockstar Over Parody Appearance In GTA6 Trailer”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
38 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re:

I agree. Techdirt is just so irresponsible here by giving this guy notoriety when everyone knows that no one would have ever heard of him if the story wasn’t featured in an article on Techdirt, well, notwithstanding coverage of the same story by much smaller media outlets like Fox News, Business Insider, USA Today, Forbes, The Guardian, and others you’ve probably never heard of…

For shame, Techdirt! How dare you, sir!

Anonymous Coward says:

Hahahahaha.

Yeah, sure.

Look, go make a parody of rockstar. I’m sure they will sue you into oblivion, while youtube,ect ban you and black list you at their behest.

They know the legality of it will NEVER matter because the person they made a “parody” of will never have the power to have a chance to hold them liable.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

They know the legality of it will NEVER matter because the person they made a “parody” of will never have the power to have a chance to hold them liable.

Not sure why you make it sound like there’s something to hold them liable for. Like the article says, parody is protected speech.

Also, people have parodied Rockstar’s games for literally years with no legal repercussions.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

You're the anti-semite, right?

Protesting Israeli privacy invading software (fine, generally, though you seemed to have a singular focus) …..even when used to fight Hamas and find hostages (not fine, there is basically no tech that doesn’t run on baby souls that you could find fault with when used for that purpose)

You cried about new Israeli laws banning terrorist and hate speech…..which y’know I’m quote against actually, except that basically every other western democracy besides the US has similar laws (als quite against).

But you tend to focus on the Israelis, right? Except you didn’t maybe the last month…..did somebody finally talk to you? About your problem?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Kinetic Gothic says:

Re:

except that basically every other western democracy besides the US has similar laws

The US and other nations have laws that criminalize to various degrees, producing and distributing such content

Isreal’s law criminalizes consumption of such content…

Few if any other western democracies have laws like that…

bhull242 (profile) says:

Re:

  1. This article has nothing to do with spyware of any sort, nor with Israel. This whole screed is a complete non sequitur. If you have a problem with those articles, post it in the comments of those articles.
  2. Geigner and Masnick are not the same person. The one who wrote those articles is Masnick; the one who wrote this article is Geigner. You’re talking to the wrong guy here.
  3. Masnick has consistently criticized many spyware providers, many of which are not Israeli. There is no discrepancy here.
  4. Masnick and others on Techdirt have also criticized those other western democracies for their laws against terrorism and hate speech. No discrepancy here, either.
  5. Opposition to or criticism of certain Israeli policies and/or companies is not antisemitic. Heck, even opposition to Israel isn’t necessarily antisemitic.
  6. Neither Mike in particular nor Techdirt in general “focus on the Israelis”, now or at any time in the past. Israel doesn’t even get mentioned much except with regards to one Israeli spyware company that was particularly controversial—even among other Israeli spyware companies—and so got more attention in general, and even then, Israel was barely mentioned. The “problem” you refer to doesn’t actually exist.
  7. You have defended Musk’s more clearly antisemitic comments as not antisemitism in the past. How is that consistent with calling what Mike is doing antisemitic?
Anonymous Coward says:

yeah

Lindsey Lohan already tried this with GTA5…and lost.
Rockstar will simply say something like: Any appearance, character, or likeness to any person(s) (alive or dead) is strictly fictional, and coincidental, and in no ways represents actual living person(s)… blah…blah…legalese.

I would like to propose a cataclysmic change to game exclusives though…
Any takers, Anyone???

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

No exlcusives
In the future, there will only be “timed exclusives”. There will then be plenty of time to optimize each 3rd party game, for each console and the PC market.
In my mind, it all works out…

Hear this analogy:
0 to 60 mph is the game.
In Porsche’s, 0 to 60 it optimized to take place in 3 secs. In Honda Civics, 0-60 is optimized to take place in 6 secs. You buy the one that you can afford.

Follow my imagination into the future:
GTA X is the game.
On the Sony console, it would be optimized for 120 fps with ray & path tracing at 8K.
On the Nintendo, it would be optimized for 60 fps using DLSS and 4k’ish performance–but it’s portable.
Your pick.
WELL…if the Sony version is always better, why buy the Ninty version: MODS would be allowed on consoles–>this could even the playing field. ALSO, console and game costs would vary. Costs is always a factor that would convince people to buy a less powerful console (ahem-Xbox Series S).

Imagine Nintendo licencing Mario to be developed by Insomniac, Naughty Dog, or Sucker Punch!
Imagine a Metroid/Spiderman machup developed in house by Nintendo!
Imagine both of these games available on every console and PC, after being optimized during the “time exclusive” window!
Both could happen if exclusives didn’t exist.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Personally, I’ve never particularly considered the meme funny to start with. Even the guy who started the meme realized that the meme has completely devolved into making fun of an entire state, and expressed regret at how mean-spirited the whole affair has become.

On the other hand, Florida continues to do all sorts of stupid shit that rationalize the label…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...