It’s Beyond Stupid That Robocallers And Lobbyists Have Made Our Voice Networks Almost Unusable

from the fifty-forth-time's-the-charm dept

It can’t be said often enough: it’s stunning that we’ve let scammers and scumbags hijack the nation’s top voice communications platform. And that we’ve let marketing and telecom industry lobbyists slowly degrade the authority of the one U.S. regulator capable of actually doing something about it.

Every six months or so the FCC comes out with a new plan it insists will finally fix the scourge that is robocalls. Yet the solutions are never quite enough to actually combat robocallers, who now annoy Americans roughly 5.1 billion times every month. We’ve noted repeatedly why robocalls are a problem that somehow never gets truly fixed:

  • Lobbying by a coalition of industries has routinely led to Supreme Court rulings that have curtailed the FCC’s authority to pursue “scammers” and legitimate companies alike.
  • Lobbying has resulted in a paradigm where the discourse fixates on “scammers,” when it’s “legitimate” industries that are routinely the biggest culprits, often using the same exact tactics as scammers to do things like harass heavily-indebted people they know can’t pay.
  • The FCC has long lacked the backbone to stand up to telecom giants that for 20 years turned a blind eye on robocalling because they profited from it (and in many cases still do).
  • The current system allows the FCC to fine robocallers, but doesn’t give the FCC the authority to actually collect those fines. That falls to the DOJ, which often doesn’t bother. The FCC has repeatedly asked for the authority to collect fines itself, but a corrupt Congress ignores the request, thanks to a prevailing “wisdom,” seeded by industry, that competent regulatory oversight is somehow bad.

Still, the FCC really loves putting on a show to suggest that a fix for the problem is just around the next corner. Like last week, when the FCC finally (after years of pressure) closed a loophole pertaining to voice over IP (VOIP) providers that gave robocallers easy access to U.S. phone numbers. Which scammers then use to spoof their numbers and hide their identities:

“…under rules adopted by the FCC yesterday, VoIP providers will face some extra hurdles. They will have to “make robocall-related certifications to help ensure compliance with the Commission’s rules targeting illegal robocalls,” and “disclose and keep current information about their ownership, including foreign ownership, to mitigate the risk of providing bad actors abroad with access to US numbering resources,” the FCC said.”

To be clear: this is good; it’s just not enough.

Every time you see the FCC do something about robocalls, you can be fairly certain that it’s (1) something people had been pressing them to do for the better part of a decade, (2) probably contains ample loopholes as not to offend the “legitimate” companies that utilize the exact same tactics as scammers, and (3) probably won’t actually stop more agile robocallers from annoying the shit out of you at dinner.

Groups like the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) have repeatedly issued reports detailing that we can’t fix robocalls until the FCC and Congress find the backbone (you might be waiting a while) to stand up to both scammers and legitimate corporations alike:

“Even when these providers are told—sometimes repeatedly—that they
are transmitting fraudulent calls, they keep doing it, because they are
making money from these calls. And even when they are caught and told
to stop, they are not criminally prosecuted, and the fines that are levied
are rarely collected.”

The robocall problem is usually framed in the press as a story about robocall scammers deftly outmaneuvering bumbling regulators. But that’s only part of the story. The reality is legitimate companies have actively constrained the FCC’s authority to do its job, blocked real reformers from being seated at the agency, and actively purchased the hollow performance that is modern regulatory oversight.

As a result, you often can’t use the fucking phone. Another byproduct of corruption and unchecked lobbying power we’ve somehow normalized over decades of dysfunction.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “It’s Beyond Stupid That Robocallers And Lobbyists Have Made Our Voice Networks Almost Unusable”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
34 Comments
Carlie Coats says:

"Do Not Call" act

My number is already on the Federal Do Not Call Registry; however, I currently receive multiple spoofed-number robo-calls (typically, five to ten per day), and my telecommunications vendor refuses to help track who is actually responsible for these calls.

I think that the Federal “Do Not Call Act” needs to be amended substantially to deal with this situation:

1) Penalties need to be adjusted for the inflation that has occurred since the 1991 passage of the Act. I suggest they should be adjusted annually by the greater of the annual Consumer Price Index inflation rate and the annual Producer Consumer Price Index inflation rate.

2) Presently, the Act lists several “aggravating factors”, which increase the statutory penalties from $500 to $1500. Even if multiple aggravating factors are present, the penalty does not increase beyond the $1000 penalty for a single aggravating factor,

Instead, the penalties should have a 19901_$ 1000.00 increment for each aggravating factor — so that, for example, if three aggravating factors are present, the statutory damages should be 1991_$ 3500.00 In particular, each request by the callee never to be called again should also be regarded as a separate aggravation, so in the case of a caller having been told by the callee 100 times never to call again, the damages should be 1991_$ 100,500.00.

3) Robo-calls are especially disruptive. The statutory damage-increment for robo-calls should be 1991_$ 3000.00 instead of 1991_$ 1000.00. Moreover, the callee should be reimbursed for attorney and court costs.

4) Spoofed-number calls are inherently deceptive, and should be considered deliberately fraudulent. The statutory damage-increment for spoofed-number calls should be 1991_$ 5000.00. Moreover, the callee should be reimbursed for attorney and court costs.

Spoofing either a government or medical-provider number should be a felony (just as impersonating a police officer is); the statutory damage increment in that case should be at least 1991_$ 20000.00.

5) As noted above, currently telecommunications vendors have no incentive to cooperate with callees, making spoofed-number calls almost impossible to track and penalize. Instead, they need an incentive. Telecommunications vendors should be reimbursed by the court at a rate of 3x their costs, for helping to establish the identities of guilty parties. That way, helping to solve this situation would be a profit-center instead of a loss-center for them.

6) When foreign call centers are found responsible for violating the Act, they should be cut off from telecommunications-contact with the US, by whatever means (diplomatic or otherwise) are necessary. Note that in this case, the NSA almost certainly knows exactly who is responsible. They should do whatever is necessary to stop this invasion of my home.

James Burkhardt (profile) says:

Re:

COngratz. You missed the entire article.

All of that, all of it, is absolutely meaningless. Why? Because your entire solution is premised on the idea that the laws have meaning. The article has been about how politicians have hamstrung any ability to enforce the existing anti-spam laws. Adding new laws and regulations to increase the size of the headline does nothing to stop scammers. You know what might? enforcing the existing laws.

John85851 (profile) says:

Re:

Like James said, you could have the best written laws in the world, with the best fines and the best punishment, but those laws are completely ineffective if no one’s going to enforce them.
And even if we assume government agencies will actively enforce the laws, how do they enforce them against overseas companies? Do you really think a company based in India or China cares about a $100,000 fine or even an atrest warrant?

Then there’s the second point that major US company is also spam people with robo calls, but enforcing the laws against them is just as useless.

Ninja says:

Although it’s a smaller problem than in the US we are receiving so many unwanted telemarketing and unsolicited calls here that people simply stopped answering regular phone calls. And this may have potentially harmful outcomes. A lot of people shifted to whitelisting phones and refusing calls from everyone else.

Telemarketing is a specially hideous beast that made plain old email an annoying experience and it’s slowly migrating to apps (specially whatsapp that’s widely used here).

I wish advertisers all burned in Hell.

Anonymous Coward says:

Many BS phone calls to my number are ones that say nothing and hang up. I usually do not answer unless I am expecting a call from an unknown number.

Upon answering other calls there are a few clicks, I guess they are multitasking calls, followed by poor english attempting to sell medicare advantage but I suspect they are just looking to get your info for later abuse.

Then there are those few calls that threaten arrest if you do not send them prepaid cards of some sort before next Tuesday. I waited eagerly for them to show up but was disappointed.

I hesitate to berate them directly due to the stories we read about swatting, so I just hang up.

Anonymous Coward says:

These unwanted calls seem to occur in spurts, as though they receive funding sporadically. During these times of multiple calls every 15 – 20 minutes, once I answered by saying:
“Code In Please”
they hung up right away
another time I answered:
“Please state the nature of your emergency”
they hung up right away
This was funny at the time and did not stop their calls.

NotTheMomma (profile) says:

I had posted my resume to Dice a couple months ago. I work in IT and was laid off. Within hours I was getting spammed with spoof calls from “recruiters” who apparently had to get really creative in ways of naming their “Recruiting Agency” with the word Technology in it. It was so bad at one point I had to turn my phone off when in an interview, an hour later my voicemail was filled with “Hello? click

Dan (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: "meaningfully claim to have a business relationship with you"

“meaningfully claim to have a business relationship with you”

The article mentions loopholes. This is the third biggest loophole after charitable and political exceptions. I have yet to see a legal definition of “a meaningful business relationship”. The informal one commonly used by merchants, “you’re on our mailing list”.

And they always say “it may take time” when you opt out. I got news for you purchasers of prime Florida Everglades property out there. If the removal isn’t immediate, it’s never going to happen.

MindParadox (profile) says:

I currently have something like 22 thousand phone numbers blocked.

The easiest way to stop robocalls is to simply add a function to phones that allows you to auto block any incoming call(preferably you could also set this for texts as well) from any number you don’t have saved into your contacts.

Currently, I have to answer the phone, realize it’s a crap call, then block the number. went from receiving nearly a hundred calls a day about 4 years ago to now my phone rings maybe once a week. (ahh, the joy of having the same cell number since 1998 :P)

ke9tv (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I had a repeat scammer spoofing my boss’s number for several months. It got bad enough that I told my boss, “please just text or email, I’ll call you back,” and explained why.

This is why whitelisting doesn’t work – the data on who called you (and had the call answered) has leaked from the carriers (owing to atrocious IT security) on a number of occasions, and the sophisticated scammers can buy it.

terop (profile) says:

It's no suprise...

I had some meetings with equity companies called Marquee Equity, and they offered a service that spams investors with spam messages until enough money falls off the investor tree.

If this is their best idea of how to get money for small companies or one-person teams, then its no wonder that phone networks are full of spam callers.

Their upfront cost of $3000 was too much for me, given that its not guaranteed that any of the investors will hand over their money, so I rejected their offer of activating spam operation.

But given this reality, our technology is not seeing its money injection that we were expecting. (the famous meshpage)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...