RFK Jr.’s FDA Removed A Webpage Of Warnings About Bogus Autism Treatments

from the snake-oil dept

Welcome to year two of the unmitigated disaster that is RFK Jr. being in charge of Health and Human Services and its child agencies. To call Kennedy an anti-vaxxer is not remotely controversial any longer, and probably never was. To state that he’s a corrupt peddler of misinformation from which he has, likely still is, and will in the future profit should be equally uncontroversial. And if there is a single health issue on which Kennedy has staked his dubious claims more than any other, it certainly must be autism spectrum disorder.

Kennedy, and Trump right alongside him, have been all over the map when it comes to his claims about autism. Kennedy was one of those leading the charge for decades in claiming that thimerosal in childhood vaccines was responsible for rising rates in autism diagnoses. When thimerosal was removed from most childhood vaccines over two decades ago and autism rates didn’t decrease, rather than admitting they were wrong, Kennedy and his cadre of hapless buffoons simply pivoted to another vaccine ingredient: aluminum. That ingredient has also been deemed safe by countless studies and experts. You know, people who actually know what the hell they’re talking about.

Since then, Kennedy has discovered all sorts of other causes of the disorder. Male circumcision? Autism! Make American girthy again, I suppose. Use of Tylenol by pregnant women and/or for young children? Autism! Fevers are super hot these days, y’all. And, of course, he is still claiming it might be vaccines too, because why the hell not? It’s not like measles is everywhere or anything.

Kennedy’s alteration of the CDC page on vaccines and autism to suggest that there just might be a link between the two is particularly appropriate, as the FDA just also disappeared a webpage informing the public on the various snake oil style scams that are out there purporting to treat autism as well.

…under anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—who has numerous ties to the wellness industry—that FDA information webpage is now gone. It was quietly deleted at the end of last year, the Department of Health and Human Services confirmed to Ars Technica.

The defunct webpage, titled “Be Aware of Potentially Dangerous Products and Therapies that Claim to Treat Autism,” provided parents and other consumers with an overview of the problem. It began with a short description of autism and some evidence-based, FDA-approved medications that can help manage autism symptoms. Then, the regulatory agency provided a list of some false claims and unproven, potentially dangerous treatments it had been working to combat. “Some of these so-called therapies carry significant health risks,” the FDA wrote.

The list included chelation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy, treatments that those in the anti-vaccine and wellness spheres have championed.

It should be obvious already that there is no evidence to suggest that these so-called autism therapies work in any way, shape, or form. That’s why the FDA had a page up warning against their use. In some cases, the danger in using them is no joke either.

Hyperbaric oxygen chamber use is probably the lesser of the two concerns. They won’t do anything for your autism, but they are typically found in facilities with staff who aren’t medical professionals and aren’t always trained well in their use generally. That’s how one five year old (!!!) that visited a wellness center that claimed to treat autism with hyperbaric chambers was incinerated inside it when a spark went off and all of that concentrated oxygen ignited. On the one hand, this person certainly doesn’t have autism any longer, though I don’t think that’s how the result is supposed to be achieved.

Then there’s chelation therapy, a process by which chemical injections into the body are performed, so that these chemicals can bind to metals within a person’s bloodstream, allowing them to be excreted through waste. Chelation actually does have legitimate uses, such as when someone has heavy metal poisoning, typically from mercury, lead, or arsenic. Using chelation therarpy to remove non-approved minerals, however, can have negative health outcomes, including death. And, of course, one of Kennedy’s minions is David Geier. Geier is an anti-vaxxer who joined HHS to “find” the cause of autism and has long been advocate for chelation therapy.

To address this nonexistent problem, anti-vaccine activists have touted chelation as a way to remove metals delivered via vaccines and treat autism. One of the most notorious of these activists is David Geier, whom Kennedy hired to the US health department last year to study the debunked connection between vaccines and autism. David Geier, along with his late father, Mark Geier, faced discipline from the Maryland State Board of Physicians in 2011 for, among other things, putting the health of autistic children at risk by treating them with unproven and dangerous hormone and chelation therapies. Mark Geier was stripped of his medical license. David Geier, who is not a scientist or doctor, was issued a civil fine for practicing medicine without a license.

So why is all of this being done? Money, of course! Kennedy has surrounded himself with these “health guru” snakeoil salesmen, both in government and out, and the lot of them have made buckets and buckets of money doing this sort of thing.

In July, KFF Health News reported that Kennedy and his wellness allies have made millions promoting unproven wellness products and treatments. Likewise, a story last week from The Wall Street Journal reported that Kennedy has surrounded himself with wellness moguls, including Brecka, who are profiting from the administration’s unambiguous embrace of unproven treatments.

Generally, my experience is that people think RFK Jr. is one of two things. One common belief is that he’s a health savior, finally sticking it to a corrupt medical industry and telling the truth about the real causes of real disorders like autism. That’s incredibly wrong for a million different reasons. The other common belief is that Kennedy’s views on vaccines and health are super wrong, and that he’s very dumb, but also that he’s a true believer.

That’s wrong, too. This is a grift and always has been. A money-making scheme built on the backs of illness and death for those who listen to him, all while he collects a government paycheck. That he was confirmed as Secretary of HHS at all was profane. That our government has allowed all of his bullshit to go unchecked and unaddressed, however, is perverse.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “RFK Jr.’s FDA Removed A Webpage Of Warnings About Bogus Autism Treatments”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
19 Comments
Thad (profile) says:

Re:

That’s a big part of how this misinformation finds an audience: the pharmaceutical industry is shady, it is lying to us, it does profit from human suffering, and it has created health crises that it’s profited from.

It is entirely reasonable for people to be suspicious of big pharma.

And people like RFK exploit that suspicion. They say things that often sound reasonable (often by lying about what they really believe; Junior frequently says he’s not anti-vaccine, he just wants to make sure vaccines are safe, and if you haven’t been paying close attention you might believe him) and which exploit people’s entirely reasonable mistrust of an industry that’s earned it.

The truth, of course, is more complicated. Big pharma does a lot of harm, and we need a government that’s willing to take the industry on. But this ain’t it, chief.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The problem lies, as it always does, in the details. Big Pharma has lied to people, and it’s not wrong to say that. But they also make products that very much help people stay alive and/or healthy. They tend to follow science and scientific principles more often than not because on average, not having legal liability for selling snake oil or literal “this will kill you” pills is what’s best for business. Therein lies the problem: RFK-like dipshits who recognize that Big Pharma lies to people often go way too far in wanting to “undo” those lies by effectively flipping to the other end of the same horseshoe.

“They say vaccines are safe, but there’s a chance they might cause autism! Therefore, vaccines can’t be safe! Let’s ban them all!” Aside from the horrific eugenics-like mindset of “I’d prefer dead non-autistic children over living autistic children”, that particular kind of bullshit is the other-end-of-the-horseshoe opposite of “vaccines are safe, nobody gets hurt from them, force them onto everyone”⁠—which is what the anti-vax crowd believes Big Pharma and “pro-vax” people are saying. The reality is that most people who believe in vaccines and the companies that make the vaccines would probably say this: “Vaccines are safe enough on average that unless your child might have a severe reaction, giving them to your child is much safer than exposing them to the diseases said vaccines are meant to stop. No vaccine is perfect, and not every reaction is predictable, but decades of tracking vaccines has proven their efficacy and safety.”

I hate when I have to defend megacorps and shit. But there’s a difference between wanting a second opinion from medical professionals and distrusting everything medical professionals say in favor of trusting an AI hallucination or some snake oil–selling “wellness guru”. Questioning Big Pharma and its motives is fine; ignoring mountains of scientific evidence in favor of “research” that amounts to listening to some rando on YouTube rant about fluoride in the water is not.

Maura says:

Re: Re: Re:

I really appreciate this take. I think part of teaching media literacy needs to include the lesson that multiple truths can exist at once and within a single entity. The sins of big pharma do not preclude the enormous benefits pharmaceuticals bestow on society, nor do they make the people pushing alternatives to them right or fair in their advocacy.

Thad (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Bobby Nurgle would have cost Trump a lot of votes as a third party candidate

I doubt it would have been a lot — all the third-party candidates in the race combined got about 2% of the vote, and no single third-party candidate has cracked 5% since Perot — but it wouldn’t have taken much. Back-of-the-napkin, if he’d taken about two points’ worth of Trump’s votes it would have swung the election.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...