Trump’s Tantrum Over Accurate Reagan Quotes Backfires: Millions Learn Reagan Opposed His Tariff Policy
from the well,-there-you-go-again dept
Donald Trump just cut off all trade negotiations with Canada because an Ontario ad campaign quoted Ronald Reagan accurately. The quotes are real. The context is accurate. But Trump called them “fake” and “fraudulent,” and the Reagan Foundation—the institution literally tasked with preserving Reagan’s legacy—backed him up by lying about what their own guy said and even threatening frivolous litigation in support of Trump’s temper tantrum.
Now, thanks to Trump’s meltdown, millions more people are watching Reagan’s actual words. And learning that Trump’s entire tariff philosophy directly contradicts what Reagan believed and said.
The ad that triggered all this is pretty straightforward. A few weeks ago, Ontario Premier Doug Ford launched a $75 million campaign using clips from a 1987 Ronald Reagan radio address about the evils of tariffs and the benefits of free trade. You can see it here:
Ford’s politics are often Trumpian, but he’s not backing down from a stupid trade war. So he pulled Reagan’s own words and ran them as a 60-second spot.
The ad campaign is definitely targeting Republicans and business execs. It first ran on the very MAGA Newsmax and the very business-focused Bloomberg, but has been expanding to Fox News (of course), CNBC, CBS, ABC, ESPN and others.
Apparently, somewhere this week, Donald Trump saw it, and it made him sad. And when Donald Trump gets sad, he lashes out like a six-year-old. He claimed that the ad was “fake” and because of that he was cutting off all trade negotiations with Canada.

If you can’t see that image, it’s Trump spewing on social media:
The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs. The ad was for $75,000. They only did this to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts. TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT
So, first off, it’s a bit weird to cut off all negotiations with Canada based on an ad from one province, Ontario, which is run by a politician from a different party than the Prime Minister. But, okay.
But the bigger issue is the claim that the Reagan quotes are “fake” or “fraudulent.” They’re not. The Reagan Foundation put out this statement, and the only “misrepresentation” is in the Foundation’s own statement:

That one says:
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute learned that the Government of Ontario, Canada, created an ad campaign using selective audio and video of President Ronald Reagan delivering his “Radio Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade,” dated April 25, 1987. The ad misrepresents the Presidential Radio Address, and the Government of Ontario did not seek nor receive permission to use and edit the remarks.
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute is reviewing its legal options in this matter. We encourage you to watch President Reagan’s unedited video on our YouTube channel.
So, first off, note the difference between what the Foundation said and what Trump said. The Foundation claims that the ad is “using selective audio” in a way that “misrepresents” Reagan. Trump took that claim (which was already bullshit) and said it means the ad is “fake” and “fraudulent.” It is neither.
The Foundation also suggests it might sue, which is laughable. They have no claim here and any attempt to go to court would fail, and fail in an embarrassing manner.
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation has gone fully Trumpy—their website is packed with MAGA interviews—and now they’re lying about what Reagan actually said and believed. The institution designed to preserve his legacy is rewriting it to please Donald Trump.
It’s pathetic.
But, of course, the Streisand Effect kicks in, and now everyone can watch what Ronald Reagan actually said in that address:
It’s only five minutes long. Every quote in the Ontario ad is in there, accurate both in text and in context. The speech was framed around Reagan’s decision to impose tariffs on certain Japanese products in response to Japan dumping below-market semiconductors, which Reagan argued violated an earlier agreement.
However, he was quite clear throughout that he was a strong believer in free trade and against tariffs, and he was only doing this, regretfully, in response to Japan violating an earlier trade agreement.
Reagan explicitly contradicted Trump’s claim that tariffs are “very important to the national security and economy of the US.” Reagan said the opposite.
Incredibly, Trump freaking out and lying about this ad is making many more people watch it and learn what Reagan actually said about tariffs and free trade. Even CNN, which pretty typically just repeats whatever Trump says, is pointing out that Trump’s claims here are nonsense and Reagan very clearly spoke out against tariffs.
On top of all this, Canada is now cutting trade deals with China and other countries in Asia. This is effectively pushing our closest ally into the waiting arms of our biggest economic rival.
This is stunningly bad policy: a foreseeable disaster stemming from a stupid approach to trade, kicked into overdrive by a presidential temper tantrum over accurate quotes from a politician many in the MAGA world pretend to idolize. Trump lied. The Reagan Foundation lied to back him up. And now Canada is cutting deals with China while the world learns that Reagan explicitly opposed everything Trump claims tariffs accomplish.
Congratulations to everyone involved. You’ve Streisanded the world into a history lesson, and handed China a trade partner in the process.
Filed Under: canada, donald trump, doug ford, free trade, mark carney, ontario, ronald reagan, tariffs, us
Companies: ronald reagan foundation


Comments on “Trump’s Tantrum Over Accurate Reagan Quotes Backfires: Millions Learn Reagan Opposed His Tariff Policy”
Next step: sue Google for manipulating YouTube clips.
Quotation appears in 1995 book
https://archive.org/details/ronaldreaganwisd00reag/page/60/mode/1up?q=%22looks+like+they%27re+doing+the+patriotic+thing+by+protecting+American+products+and+jobs%22
'You weren't supposed to actually DO it!'
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute: The quotes they used were misleading and taken out of context, you need to watch the original broadcast to know what he actually said.
People actually do that
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute: Wait, no!
Re:
Reagan: “The way to prosperity for all Nations is rejecting protectionist legislation, and promote free and fair competition.”
Reagan Foundation: Well, yeah maybe… but, you know, context and stuff, it’s important. No, really, it’s not what he meant to say. You’re just twisting the facts. And since you don’t have any permission whatsoever, so we’ll just sue.
Ford replayed Reagan in US - Trump sent it viral globally
Ontario’s Doug Ford beat Trump at the earned media game in the biggest and most embarrassing way.
Ontario’s $75 million linear TV ad buy targeted to U.S. adults had an estimated unique reach ceiling in the adult TV-viewing population — say 200–250 million — so the budget likely achieved a very high frequency across a sizeable portion of the U.S. GOP-leaning audience.
But that was multiplied and amplified worldwide by Trump’s Tantrum response.
And multiplied Bigly….
Since Trump’s “cancel Canada trade” reaction went fully viral worldwide, a defensible global reach estimate would be roughly 1.4 billion unique people worldwide, combining social and linear TV audiences after deduplication.
What Trump thought made him look like a tough guy simply exposed Reagan’s tariff truths versus his own tariff stupidity showing the whole world that he is a complete, incompetent fool.
Re:
Watching the Reagan Foundation absolutely defile his legacy by bending at the knee for Trump is making me rather gleeful.
Re: Re:
That’s got to be the most pathetic part of this, it would be one thing if it was just some stooge from the regime making that lie but for someone from the Reagan Foundation to lie about what he said shows such an incredible amount of contempt towards the person and legacy of the person who the foundation is built upon, and it just becomes even more pathetic when you consider it takes literal minutes to see that they were lying.
Re: Re: Re:
On the other hand, what could possibly be a more fitting tribute to Ronald Reagan’s legacy than offering a knee-jerk defense of another Republican in total defiance of any other previously-claimed principles?
Re: Re: Re:2
Exactly. I think it’s a rather fitting end of his legacy to tie it to Trump.
Re: Re: Re:3
Oh, Trump is absolutely the endpoint of Reagan’s legacy.
Re:
You and Mike seem to think that Trump had some sort of goal here, beyond “get in the news yet again”. I have my doubts; maybe this wasn’t really a “backfire” or any other kind of failure. I mean, we’re all talking about Trump again, right? A person who likes to put their name onto everything, preferably in giant gold letters. Any publicity is good publicity.
Re:
On top of everything else that’s humiliating about this, can you imagine what it must feel like to be outsmarted by Doug Ford?
Re: Re:
Because of course Ford would outsmart Trump, given how dumb Trump is.
Re: Re: Re: 'You won the race!' 'My opponent is dead, like literally.' 'And you sure beat them!'
Outsmarting Trump is as difficult to manage as beating an actual corpse in a foot-race, you have to really put in the effort to not be able to do it.
Re: Re: Re:
Keep going, you’re halfway to understanding the joke.
That aged well
Let's see...
Prices for Americans going up? Check
Jobs market tanking? Check
Healthcare still sucks? Check
Trump wanting to kill Medicaire and Social Security? Check
Our allies turning away and working out deals with China? Check
Recipe for MAGA shit pie? Check
But hey, at least Trump will have a giant ballroom, and nothing to fill it with.
Where is the investigation on the deliberate pillaging and weakening of America beyond the regime’s evident senility?
Sure, Trump’s a loose cannon, but those behind this catastrophe are nearly legion.
One more lesson from Ronnie...
On top of this lesson on the value of free trade, Ronnie also unintentionally proved that trickle down economics don’t work.
So, apparantly the Ronald Reagan Memorial Libaray is so hard up, that they can’t afford a competent lawyer who would tell them that as Government speach, the address is in the public domain, and no permissions are required.
Oh, and allegedly misrepresenting the content of the address, that would be protected by the First Admendment, if it had misprepresnted the address, which it really didn’t
Re:
Yeah, so many things going on here, you coukd spend days writing articles about nearly every claim. Yours is yet another good point.
Then there is “interfering with the supreme court”. lolwut? Tarriffs are important to National Security (apparently a proper noun now) huh? Important to the economy – well, sure, in a not very good way.
Seems Charlie Kirk is only the latest in a long line of dead republicans whose words are always claimed to be either false or taken out of context, which always manage to be even worse when given their full context.
Ronald Wilson Reagan (#40, 1981-1989) was the one who negotiated the original free trade agreement with Canada, then under Conservative PM “Lyin’ Brian” Mulroney (who served 1984-1993). Both were conservatives with Irish ancestry, IIRC one of the top-level meetings was branded the “Shamrock Summit”.
As such, it doesn’t actually surprise me that Reagan supported free trade, any more than it would surprise me if Hitler liked autobahns and Volkswagens. What doesn’t make sense is that no one ever called out Trump for ripping off Reagan’s “Let’s Make America Great Again” slogan while Trump urinates all over Reagan’s free-trade legacy.
Something changed
I watched the report on Global Canada who reported that Trump had already seen the ad and brushed it off. Then something happened and he saw it again, which kicked in his Streisand response.
Re:
Trump’s mind (such as it is) changes all the time, for no identifiable reason. Who knows whether, upon seeing it a second time, there was even any memory of having seen it before.
Then again, this is a person who seems to have no trouble holding several contradictory opinions at the same time. Maybe nothing changed.
Re:
After 5 minutes, he probably forgot that he’d already seen it.
Learned?
The article suggested that people ‘learned’ that Trump was lying (surprise!). You can rest assured that the true Trumpistas did not learn. Science has shown that a plenaria flatworm can learn but it has not shown that a true Trumpista is capable of the same feat.
I know there's a lot wrong with this situation, but...
Why the hell would a foreign government need to ask a non-profit group to use the public remarks of a US president?
Re:
They wouldn’t, and neither would anyone else.
Learn? Will they?
I’d have to question the lede. It assumes that those who need to learn the truth are actually capable of recognizing truth or learning. I’ve seen little evidence of either among the ‘base’.
Misrepresentation
The quote is misleading because people are under the assumption that tariffs are so bad that they should never be used for any reason. And yet Reagan was saying this AFTER he had imposed his own tariffs on Japan, because he had to correct a trade imbalance. One example was a 45% tariff on Japanese motorcycles. Do you think people would think differently about the quote, knowing that Reagan actively used tariffs? Of course they would, but you literally don’t understand what “context” means because “he really said it! Trumps a liar!!! (yells at cloud and punches air)”.
Re:
That’s wrong. The quote is entirely accurate and (unlike Trump) I gave the full context here, and it remains accurate. Reagan reluctantly issued a single tariff for a single purpose after Japan violated an existing trade agreement. Reagan was explaining why tariffs are bad, but also why he made this one exception which he wanted to stop as soon as possible.
The context does not change the message one bit: Reagan hated tariffs. He thought they were bad, because they are bad. The ad was accurate.
Trump is now running around claiming Reagan “loved tariffs” and that the ad was AI. Both of which are bullshit.
Why are you covering for bullshit?