A Memo To Corporate America: How To Stop Being Cartoon Villains
from the stand-for-something dept
I’ve spent considerable time lately documenting how America’s corporate elite have transformed themselves into the exact cartoon villains that Marxists always claimed they were—groveling before authoritarian power, paying tribute to criminal regimes, abandoning every principle they’ve spent decades claiming to represent. But criticism without constructive alternatives is just intellectual masturbation, so let me offer some practical guidance for any CEO who might still possess a functioning moral compass.
If you are a person of influence in the corporate world, if you actually care about this country and its future, if you understand that your company’s long-term interests depend on the survival of constitutional governance—here’s what you should do immediately.
The Board Room Speech You Need to Give
Call your senior executive team together. Get all your board members on video conference. Tell them that you are committed to the company’s interests, and that one of the things you believe serves the company’s interests is maintaining basic ethical standards—both inside the company and in the society where the company operates.
Remind them that at the end of the day, we are all members of that society, and it is in all of our interests that we live in a free and fair nation governed by law rather than personal whim. Point out that if your company were to make bribes or pay favors to foreign governments, you would face criminal liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Ask them: do any of us think that’s wrong?
Then ask the crucial question: what do we think of the idea of paying bribes to the president of our own country in order to get government licenses or approval for business transactions? Is it really our position that we’re just going to go along with this as “business necessity,” or are we going to lawyer up like responsible corporate citizens and sue the government when it demands tribute?
The Legal and Moral Framework
Here’s what principled corporate leadership looks like in practice:
Refuse Tribute Payments: When administration officials suggest that regulatory approval might go smoother with a “contribution” to Trump-approved causes, document the conversation and file complaints with relevant authorities. Yes, this may slow your approval process. That’s the point—legitimate government doesn’t operate through tribute systems.
Challenge Illegal Conditions: When agencies attach political loyalty tests to routine business transactions, sue immediately. Every settlement payment, every accommodation to illegal demands, every “pragmatic” compromise with corruption makes the system worse for everyone while temporarily protecting your immediate interests.
Coordinate Resistance: Work with other companies facing similar pressure to challenge corrupt practices collectively rather than individually. The administration can intimidate isolated companies much more easily than coordinated business resistance backed by serious legal firepower.
Maintain Public Standards: Continue operating according to constitutional principles even when the government doesn’t. Maintain transparent procurement, independent auditing, ethical business practices that demonstrate what legitimate governance should look like.
The Business Case for Constitutional Governance
This isn’t just moral positioning—it’s strategic necessity for any business that wants to operate in sustainable market conditions:
Legal Predictability: Tribute economies destroy the rule of law that makes long-term business planning possible. When regulatory approval depends on political loyalty rather than legal compliance, no business can predict future operating conditions.
Market Integrity: Corruption destroys competitive markets by making political connections more valuable than product quality, innovation, or efficiency. Your company’s success should depend on serving customers, not serving regime officials.
International Reputation: Every American company that accommodates Trump’s tribute demands destroys America’s reputation as a reliable business partner and constitutional democracy. This makes international cooperation more difficult and expensive for everyone.
Talent Retention: Ethical employees don’t want to work for companies that pay bribes to maintain market position. Brain drain toward companies with integrity creates competitive disadvantages for collaborationist firms.
The Historical Examples
The German Industrialists’ Mistake: Business leaders who thought they could use the Nazis while remaining untouched discovered that authoritarian regimes don’t honor implicit deals with collaborators. When their usefulness expired, their collaboration became evidence of their expendability.
The Post-Apartheid Reckoning: South African businesses that accommodated apartheid found themselves facing massive legal liability, international boycotts, and domestic fury when the system collapsed. Their “pragmatic” accommodation became permanent reputational damage.
The Post-Soviet Transformation: Russian oligarchs who built fortunes through corruption under Yeltsin discovered that their wealth made them targets rather than protected them when Putin consolidated power. Corruption doesn’t create security—it creates vulnerability.
The Choice You Face
You can continue the current path—paying tribute, staying silent, accommodating illegal demands, hoping that compliance will protect you when the regime’s appetite for control inevitably expands. This path leads to the complete destruction of competitive markets, constitutional governance, and ultimately your own legitimacy as business leaders.
Or you can choose the harder path of principled resistance: challenging illegal demands through courts, coordinating with other businesses facing similar pressure, maintaining ethical standards despite government pressure, and demonstrating that American business still believes in American values.
The Stakes for You
Every day you delay this choice, you make capitalism’s eventual reckoning more severe. Every tribute payment, every silent accommodation, every “pragmatic” compromise with corruption provides ammunition for socialist organizers who argue that business interests inevitably choose authoritarianism over democracy when their privileges are threatened.
You are proving their argument correct. You are validating every Marxist critique of capitalism through your own behavior. You are ensuring that whatever emerges from this constitutional crisis will be far more hostile to market systems than anything you would have faced by choosing resistance over accommodation.
The Leadership Opportunity
The irony is that principled resistance would actually enhance your long-term position rather than threatening it. Business leaders who stood up to authoritarian demands, who defended constitutional principles despite economic costs, who chose democratic integrity over oligarchic access—they would emerge from this crisis with enormous moral authority and political capital.
Instead, you’re choosing the path that maximizes short-term comfort while ensuring long-term destruction. You’re preserving immediate profits while discrediting the market system that makes profit accumulation legitimate.
The Bottom Line
If you actually believe in the free market capitalism you’ve spent decades defending, then defend it. If you actually think constitutional governance serves business interests better than oligarchic tribute systems, then defend constitutional governance. If you actually care about leaving your children a country worth inheriting, then stop acting like the cartoon villains in someone else’s revolution.
The hour is late, but it’s not too late. American business still has the resources, legal standing, and collective power to challenge systematic corruption if you choose to use them. But that window is closing rapidly, and every day of continued accommodation makes the eventual reckoning more severe.
You wanted to be remembered as job creators and wealth builders. Keep accommodating authoritarianism, and you’ll be remembered as the useful idiots who handed socialists the perfect argument for why capitalism cannot coexist with democracy.
Choose wisely. History is watching, and your children will live with the consequences of whatever choice you make.
But not much time. The choice is yours, but you have to make it now.
Mike Brock is a former tech exec who was on the leadership team at Block. Originally published at his Notes From the Circus.
Filed Under: cartoon villains, corruption, principles


Comments on “A Memo To Corporate America: How To Stop Being Cartoon Villains”
here chick chick.
Who Believes that Bird Flu can Spread across a WHOLE NATION so that the Corps tell the Farmers Raising the Chickens, THEY arnt paying for them And demands they be Killed.
How to spread a local contagion, Nationally?
Its in the food or its in the Process While raising the Chickens.
ITS NOT from wild Birds Defecating NEAR/AROUND/On the roof of the Chickens.
The Final process for Slaughtering Chickens, is a Feed that make them Soo Thirsty they Drown in the Water they drink. Which is why Chickens tend to be OVER PLUMP. How Much water can a Chicken contain in its Bodily Fluids/Muscles/Tendons.
Who is old enough to remember Whole Chickens from the store at 0.99 Each. Not $4+.
A corps that Makes Mistakes SHOULD TAKE THE HIT. NOT the consumer.
The other part in Much of this, is the corps are NOT growing food FOR US. They are growing food to SELL OUTSIDE THE USA. We export over 60% of our Food stock. Also know as, WE OVER GROW.
If you dont get this, Look up the 25% Chicken tax. The Logic came around that CAUSE we cant sell OUR chickens to Certain Nations(they dont Like our Chickens) they would TAX US, for not being able to.
NOW IF Trump would CLEAN the Corps Idiocy up. Insted of running Amok and Shooting Everything Down. He could save the Citizens Billions.
You are another person who mentally lives in the 50s. Corporate america is now predominantly made up of shareholder owned companies. Boards are liable for their actions and not kissing the ring can be construed as not caring enough. Who cares if it’s really necessary to do so if a litigious shareholder can drag you through the courts and make your life miserable? Even if noone does, the threat is there. It’s a system where one side can always say “I never wanted this, they wanted this” and the other side points back saying “I never said that”, perfectly dissolving responsibility.
Re:
And look where modern corporate America is getting us. Look at EA, a major games company with a significant portfolio and long-term revenue potential now facing being dismantled and sold for scrap in the name of “shareholder value”. Look at Target, where trying to chase “shareholder value” has resulted in the company being more valuable being sold for scrap than as a going concern. And they’re still facing the possibility of a litigious shareholder dragging them through the courts arguing that the value of a company still in business is greater than the bargain-basement prices gotten by breaking them up and selling the pieces for scrap and that that constitutes violation of the fiduciary duty of the executives to maximize shareholder value.
Re:
That’s why we should treat shareholders like cops treat dogs.
Re: Re:
You really, love shooting grandma, don’t you?
None of them defend a free market. But i suppose it is good to be charitable to get them to see sense.
Corporate villains will never stop being corporate villains; the system they live in incentivizes villainous behavior. The system has to be changed by the rest of us, because the people who benefit from it will never change it voluntarily.
TL, DR
TL, DR: We live in a society, not an economy.
Re:
You want to live in a society, but it’s not run and lived in like a society.
Thank you for nothing Thatcher.
That megayacht has sailed
Sorry Mr Brock but that’s just wishful thinking for an ideal which was only reluctantly accepted under threat of severe penalties under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act – it’s much easier to do business with suitcases full of cash. Trump suspended the FCPA in February.
There is no guarantee that the USA will inevitably turn towards fairness and harmony so corporations and institutions and the individuals behind them are making their choices, bets on the future, some prostrating themselves, some resisting.
“Call your senior executive team together. Get all your board members”, “we are all members of that society”
We’re not. We live in gated communities or secure apartment blocks and are transported by limo or private jet.
Capitalism
Is not longer a USA worry, its a World Worry. We have Scrap/Garbage Taken from the East coast to 3rd world nations. Cause its CHEAPER then trying to recycle it.
We have a Stock exchange that you get No Ownership for the Price you paid. Better to Make More Stock thats worth Nothing.
The nation Makes More food then needed, by 3x, between waste and exports, the corps get to Writ it off. And those Exports? DO you think they are PRE-Processed as badly as in the USA?? Then you wonder WHY they wont buy our Chickens in the EU.
Small trucks have a Larger Environmental Tax on then Because ?? The Wheel base is so small, Even if they get 40mpg, They are Required to get 60mpg.
CORPS dont need to sell Stocks, the use of Stocks was to Update and Improve the Corps/companies. Then be repaid. They were NOT designed to be a LONG term Bank, that could NEver be repaid. And Why they keep Supporting the Large corps from going bankrupt. They would OWE more then the stocks are worth. And So many people would be affected, NOT counting the Companies that WORK with Stocks.
The Idea, that it takes 1000 people to Process a Chicken or Any food stock is idiocy. Its those Lined up After the 3-5 people that had to handle the Materials.
Free market? No such thing in the USA. And the internet can prove it. No company can COME to the USA and build a business of their Own goods, anymore. The USA corps and the distribution system would Shut them out. To show this, Look at Amazon, Building its OWN distribution system.
How about looking at Products sold as food. They want a Product to be Sold, but create More then is Needed, as Products expire as of Want or need or Bad Quality. It used to be that Excess would be sent to Poor Distribution. But there is So much, and the Stores pay so little, it goes to the Garbage, and DESTROYED so it cant be reused.
There are So many ways to create waste, its REALLY BAD.