She Pushed To Overturn Trump’s Loss In The 2020 Election. Now She’ll Help Oversee U.S. Election Security.
from the seems-bad dept
This story was originally published by ProPublica. Republished under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.
Heather Honey, a high-profile denier of Donald Trump’s loss in the 2020 election, has been appointed to a senior position in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in which she’ll help oversee the nation’s election infrastructure.
Honey is a protege of Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer who tried to help Trump overturn the 2020 election results. In 2024, ProPublica reported that Honey had played a key role in Mitchell’s behind-the-scenes effort to change Georgia’s election rules to allow Republican officials to contest a potential Trump loss in that year’s presidential race. Honey also promoted election conspiracy theories, including one Trump cited in a speech to his followers before they stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Though states do the on-the-ground work of running elections, DHS supports them with tasks beyond their capacities, such as protecting IT infrastructure and voter databases from foreign intrusions. The agency, with bipartisan support, took on this role in the aftermath of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.
Experts on voting and state election officials warned that Honey’s appointment as DHS’ deputy assistant secretary of election integrity could erode trust between state and federal officials, prompting states not to share information with the agency.
“We are witnessing a dangerous trend: the elevation of known bad-faith actors like Heather Honey,” said Adrian Fontes, Arizona’s Democratic secretary of state, in a statement, citing Honey’s “well-documented history of spreading election lies that have been debunked in court.”
Fontes called her involvement with DHS “deeply troubling” and said “when the agency gives a platform to individuals who have actively worked to erode public trust, it becomes harder to view DHS as a reliable partner in election security.”
A DHS spokesperson did not answer questions from ProPublica on Honey’s appointment or the exact nature of her responsibilities. Honey didn’t respond to calls or emails. The White House also didn’t respond to a request for comment. Her name is listed on the organization’s leadership structure online, and her appointment was first reported by the website Democracy Docket.
In the first Trump administration, the federal government set up programs designed to shield U.S. elections from foreign interference, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, an arm of DHS. But Trump soured on this and other initiatives after the director of CISA publicly rebutted his claims that the 2020 election was stolen.
Since the start of the second Trump presidency, the administration has gutted those programs, cutting hundreds of employees at CISA. Its director, Chris Krebs, is now under federal investigation, DHS has said; Krebs told CNN that the investigation appeared to be an act of political retribution. The Justice Department has also rolled back a program aimed at combatting foreign influence campaigns. Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a memorandum that the Justice Department’s program was disbanded to “free resources to address more pressing priorities, and end risks of further weaponization and abuses of prosecutorial discretion.”
David Becker, the executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, a nonprofit focused on building trust in American elections, said the cuts had dismantled “nearly all” of DHS’ capacity to protect election infrastructure. He said state elections officials feared that Honey’s appointment, combined with the program cuts, signaled the Trump administration’s intent to eliminate bulwarks of fair U.S. elections.
“The hiring of an election conspiracy theorist with no election knowledge or expertise is the culmination of this reversal,” Becker said. “DHS now appears poised to become a primary amplifier of false election conspiracies pushed by our enemies.”
Two sources familiar with Honey’s hiring at DHS said she began working for the agency last week. An organizational chart dated Aug. 18 on the department’s website identifies her as a leader in the agency’s Office of Strategy, Policy and Plans. Her position wasn’t on a version of the website archived in July, and officials in former administrations said that there’s been no such job previously.
It’s not clear yet what Honey will oversee, but former DHS officials said that deputy assistant secretaries are typically the agency’s top experts in their subject areas. They’re often involved in drafting executive orders and crafting policies. They also serve as liaisons to the White House and the National Security Council.
Since Honey started, Trump has announced “a movement to get rid of” mail-in ballots and voting machines via executive order, though a top aide subsequently said the administration would pursue those goals through legislative action. DHS has also threatened to cut off about $28 million in grants to help states prepare for terrorism and disasters if they don’t change voting rules to conform to the administration’s priorities, NPR has reported.
Honey’s duties likely would include helping to organize the government’s policy responses if foreign actors make intrusions into the nation’s election systems, former officials said. To do this, and to assess the security of election infrastructure, someone in her position would typically have access to classified information, including the government’s election-related intelligence.
Experts expressed concern about Honey’s portfolio, given her history of spreading misinformation.
“Heather Honey’s past misleading claims about vote counts in Pennsylvania, among other things, have helped fuel false conspiracy theories about stolen elections,” said Larry Norden, an election expert at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, a nonpartisan law and policy group.
Before becoming swept up in the “Stop the Steal” movement, Honey had no experience in the federal government or as an election administrator, working as a Pennsylvania-based private investigator.
After the 2020 election, she became a contractor for a Republican-backed audit seeking proof of fraud in ballots cast in Maricopa County, Arizona. According to emails between employees working on the review, which ended up reaffirming Biden’s win, Honey helped draft the final report.
Since then, Honey has led at least three organizations devoted to transforming election systems in ways championed by conservatives, such as tightening eligibility requirements for people to be on voter rolls. Members of Honey’s Pennsylvania Fair Elections, a state chapter of Mitchell’s nationwide Election Integrity Network, have challenged the eligibility of thousands of residents to be on voter rolls.
Honey has also been involved in numerous other efforts to transform elections around the country, including a successful push to get many states with Republican leadership to pull out of a bipartisan interstate partnership to share data to make voting more secure.
Filed Under: cleta mitchell, conspiracy theories, dhs, donald trump, election denialism, election security, elections, heather honey


Comments on “She Pushed To Overturn Trump’s Loss In The 2020 Election. Now She’ll Help Oversee U.S. Election Security.”
Good ridden democracy!
It wasn’t that bad, but monarchy has won.
“DHS has also threatened to cut off about $28 million in grants to help states prepare for terrorism and disasters if they don’t change voting rules to conform to the administration’s priorities, NPR has reported.”
Color me unsurprised that Trump’s DHS is now using mob tactics to rig elections. “Nice state you have there…very scenic. It’d be a shame if something happened to it, you know, like a terrorist attack that we forgot to warn you about.”
Who wants to bet?
If Trump needs her to just find 11,780 votes, will she be as resourceless as Raffensperger?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
So what? She sounds like someone who believes strongly in the sanctity of political franchise. That’s exactly the kind of person we want defending the security of our elections.
Re:
Does she care about the sanctity of elections regardless of who wins? Because if she only demands investigations and recounts and whatnot when Democrats win, it would signal that she doesn’t care how Republicans win so long as Democrats lose. People who oversee election security should care less about who wins and care far, far, far more about whether the election is secure so it can be free and fair.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Irrespective of the fact that Democrats are responsible for approx. 60% of all cases of prosecuted voter fraud in the U.S. in the past 10 years (local, county, state, national), there’s no reason to think that Double-H won’t perform her duties in a non-partisan manner and uphold the oath(s) she swears.
Re: Re: Re:
Um. No. That’s simply not true:
https://the2020election.org/voter-fraud-convictions-since-2016/
Re: Re: Re:2
Do you realize that your link in no way refutes his statement?
No, of course you don’t.
Re: Re: Re:3
The original said Democrats are responsible for 60% of voter fraud. The data says you’re wrong:
So yeah that link refutes that statement.
Re: Re: Re:
She literally tried to help Trump overturn legitimate election results in 2020. There’s every reason to believe that she won’t perform her duties in a non-partisan manner.
Re: Re: Re:2
“legitimate”
Re: Re: Re:3
Feel free to post evidence of it not being legitimate.
Re: Re: Re:4
Well now, there was this video of people moving boxes around. Definitely meant something! They moved boxes!!! It’s not possible Trump pissed off so many people with his bullshit despite his own supporters saying, “I like how he makes people angry.” That definitely wouldn’t have an effect on the election… At best it’s just disbelief that voter suppression didn’t work well enough that time around.
Re: Re: Re:
Either you’re Heather Honey or you’re being bizarrely parasocial, and neither one is a good look.
Re: Re: Re:2
It could also be a subtle Nazi greeting.
Re:
“So what? The wolf sounds like someone who strongly believes in the safety of the sheep. That’s exactly the type of creature we want defending the sheep inside the fences!”
“Irrespective of the fact that sheepdogs are responsible for approx. 60% of all cases of murdered sheep, there’s no reason to think that the wolf won’t perform its duties in a respectful and non-violent manner. It told me so itself, so it must be true!”
Another job for DHS??
WHY??
ITS NOT THEIR JOB.
NOT IN THE JOB DESCRIPTION..
Re:
DHS are a good starting base for stocking up on racists, and their “get rid of unwhites” agenda has been heavily funded by Congress.
Closing down every other agency and transferring their tasks (“competency” would be the wrong word at least at the start) there is a much faster version of ideological cleansing (well, more of a dirtying actually) than working in-place.
The DHS are Trump’s brownshirts by another name.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
You guys need to stop obsessing over 2020. Cuz there was a lot of “shenanigans” in that election, but you sure af lost 2024 and seem likely to lose 2028, too.
Re:
From where I sit, only one group of people seem obsessed with the results of the 2020 election, and it’s conservatives. They’re the ones who keep trying to litigate that election. They’re the ones who keep trying to blame the insurrection on Antifa or downplay the insurrection as “a spirited discussion”. They’re the ones who, to this day, claim that the results of a free and fair election were bogus despite multiple recounts and multiple investigations—one of which was run by a conservative-friendly group—showing that the results were what they were and the amount of actual voter fraud rounds out to far less than 1% of all ballots cast.
By the by, when Trump won in 2024, did you see anyone in the Biden administration trying to do what Trump did after Biden won in 2020? Because I don’t recall Biden or any of his people calling up states and begging them to “find” votes that didn’t exist.
Re: Re: Order of magnitude, please...
That is a very conservative estimate, kind of like “MacDonalds: more than 1000 hamburgers served”.
Isn’t hiring a woman DEI?
Re:
Only if she is less competent than other applicants. Which obviously is the case, but for one thing the competent applicants passed over are both male and female.
And you have to take into account that in the Trump administration, “competent” takes its “comp” from “nincompoop”.
We can no longer trust the institutions of the United States, especially the presidency.
If we can no longer trust the institutions that make up the Federal Government, then we can no longer trust the Federal Government.
If faith in the Federal Government is broken, the Government has no consent to rule.
“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it… ”
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
I do not consent, do you?