Trump Administration Injects Even More Bigotry Into The US Military
from the make-America-segregated-again dept
Trump claims to love the military. Of course, he loves himself even more. And he tends to view those injured, killed, or captured by enemy forces as “suckers” and “losers.” He also considers people who volunteer to serve this country as idiots, since the idea of self-sacrifice for the greater good is the antithesis of cutthroat capitalism, where only zero sum deals are acceptable.
But he’ll wave the flag, hug the flag, hold military parades on his birthday, and otherwise pretend to be the most patriotic of Americans, when he’s really just the most Trump in a long line of Trumps.
Whatever perceived failures America might have can be fixed by the art of the deal dude, if his internal delusions are to be believed. Surely the problem isn’t the nation’s inability to sincerely address its shortcomings. No, the problems are all “democrat” things, like diversity, equitable treatment, respect for other people, and tolerance of ideas that might clash with our subjective beliefs.
Trump’s return to office has ushered in a new era of revisionist history. It’s simply not enough for the alleged Leader of the Free World to suggest the liberals have us all wrong. He must write his version of history into the permanent record, whether it’s by allowing military bases to reclaim their Confederate warlord names or by insisting national parks be more blindly patriotic, rather than dispassionately presenting historical facts to visitors.
Pete Hegseth — Fox New contributor and alleged sexual harasser — now heads the military. So far, he’s having trouble commanding any respect, especially since he seems to view any covert military actions as chatroom fodder. Worse, he’s seemingly incapable of admitting any wrongdoing, much less taking personal responsibility for his errors. Hegseth says a lot of stupid shit about “lethality” but fails to understand the thing that makes the military work is its high level of personal accountability, something plenty of cop shops who cosplay as soldiers also fail to comprehend.
Those failures aside, what’s happening now is only going to make the military worse. And it’s going to further damage a relationship with the nation as a whole that is already well on its way to “irreparable” thanks to Trump, Hegseth, and pretty much everyone in the current administration.
While this administration is certainly hateful enough to desire a steady separation of black people from government paychecks, it’s too cowardly to start providing separate bathrooms and water fountains for non-whites. Instead, it’s going to do shady shit like this, which comes with enough implausible deniability the administration will never truly be held accountable for its not-so-on-the-sly bigotry.
The Army is preparing to roll out a new policy that could lead to soldiers diagnosed with a chronic skin condition that causes painful razor bumps and scarring to be kicked out of the service — an issue that disproportionately affects Black men.
The new guidance, expected to take effect in the coming weeks, would bar permanent shaving waivers and require medical personnel to craft formal treatment plans for affected troops, according to multiple service officials and internal documents reviewed by Military.com.
Soldiers in need of prolonged waivers may be directed to get laser treatments. Those who need shaving exemptions for more than 12 months over a two-year period could be kicked out of the Army.
These waivers — which were created for the purpose of retaining more soldiers, especially the group that makes up nearly 25% of new recruits. People identifying as white have steadily abandoned the armed forces, dropping from 44,000 recruits in 2018 to just over 25,000 as of two years ago.
As Military.com points out, the shaving exemption was created to retain black soldiers back in the early 1970s. And while the government will be offering laser treatment, these treatments can lead to permanent scarring and/or changes in skin pigmentation.
The other argument — that trimmed beards prevent proper gas mask/respirator use — is also bullshit:
[A] 2021 study from Military Medicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal, found there’s no conclusive evidence that a well-groomed, modest beard interferes with mask function.
The only excuse offered for this transparently racist mandate by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sounds like the sort of thing uttered by a stock redneck character written by the laziest of hacks:
“We kicked out good soldiers for having naked women tattooed on their arms,” Hegseth said in a March statement criticizing what he characterized as bad policy decisions by past administrations. “And today we are relaxing the standards on shaving, dreadlocks, man buns, and straight-up obesity. Piece by piece, the standard had to go — because of equity.”
When men were men and had naked women on their arms and mudflaps, says the SecDef born in 1980. “Because of equity,” says the guy who managed to land a top government job because he looked semi-sober during Fox News broadcasts and, coincidentally, had actually spent some time in the military.
But it’s not just black people Hegseth wants vanished from the military, if not history itself. It’s also gay people. No one anywhere was crying out for this supposed wrong to be righted, but here’s Johnny on the Spot doing it anyway:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to take the rare step of renaming a ship, one that bears the name of a gay rights icon, documents and sources show.
Military.com reviewed a memorandum from the Office of the Secretary of the Navy — the official who holds the power to name Navy ships — that showed the sea service had come up with rollout plans for the renaming of the oiler ship USNS Harvey Milk.
A defense official confirmed that the Navy was making preparations to strip the ship of its name but noted that Navy Secretary John Phelan was ordered to do so by Hegseth. The official also said that the timing of the announcement — occurring during Pride month — was intentional.
Yep, everything about this sounds exactly like Hegseth and the Trump Administration, from the wholly unnecessary renaming of ship that no one had said anything about for nearly a decade to the issuing of the mandate during Pride month because otherwise people might think this is just casual bigotry, rather than deliberately targeted, maximally cruel bigotry.
This isn’t a one-off either. Hegseth wants more ships renamed. Can you guess why?
The documents obtained by CBS News also show other vessels named after prominent leaders are also on the Navy’s renaming “recommended list.”
Among them are the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Medgar Evers.
These are the actions of the people “leading” this nation. This is how they behave — like tyrants and bullies, rather than public servants or, you know, actual leaders. It’s a multi-trillion dollar circle jerk attended by every frat boy, himbo, bimbo, and substance abuser willing to hitch their wagon to Trump’s delusions of grandeur. Unfortunately for the people who actually make America great, we’re not only expected to cover the tab, but live in a nation that’s becoming increasingly hostile to most of the people who reside in it.
Filed Under: army, bigotry, dei, erasing history, harvey milk, hatred, homophobia, navy, racism, trump administration


Comments on “Trump Administration Injects Even More Bigotry Into The US Military”
'Join the US military, one day you might be a concentration camp guard!'
Nothing like mixing your bigotry and contempt for the military with a heaping dose of anti-recruitment motivation for any but the most abhorrent of people to join the US military I suppose, a real two-for-one there.
Re:
… or join the Marines, and end up filling parking violations for ICE to detain the car owner indefinitely.
One way or the other, you’ll serve The Great Nation’s King that will bless you in return by His “you’re a dumbass”.
Re: Re: 'Sign up for the US military! All it'll cost you is your dignity, humanity, and self-respect!'
Before Trump calling those who signed up for the military suckers and losers would have been an insult to the intelligence and self-sacrifice of those willing to sign up and risk their lives like that, but at this point anyone who still wants the job with him as their ultimate commander has well and truly earned the label he gave them.
To be fair, Trump views everyone else as suckers and losers, whether they kiss up to him or not.
Re:
Doncha know? Trump was the one foretold by P T Barnum in his famous prophecy: “There’s one born every minute,” though I understand in order to avoid all the unnecessary wear and tear on Trump’s Mom, he had to redial it down to “born yesterday”. As the only President certifiably born yesterday, Trump therefore makes history as the perennially youngest president of the United States, and for that matter, of any state anywhere anywhen …
Next up; “menstruation affects readiness.”
Honestly though, I’m actually glad about this. Given the administration’s complete disregard for logistics (“lets get rid of any part thats not lethal”), willingness to use troops on civilians, increasing rhetoric invading allied nations, and general slide into fascism, the fewer people in the military the better.
Get the fuck out any way you can, unless you actually like the idea of working for the nazis. In that case, bad luck. You deserve it.
Re:
Now, I never said the choice would be simple or easy, there will be consequences either way. But it still boils down to this: you either get out now, disobey orders and get court martialled when they order you to commit atrocities, or you commit those atrocities.
And this is not some future hypothetical, they are putting people in concentration camps right now. The atrocities have already begun.
Re: Re:
And that includes the Dade-Collier Concentration Camp in Florida.
No, that isn’t its official name or even its widely accepted “nickname”.
Yes, it’s what it should be called—in full, every time it’s referenced, no exceptions.
Re: Re: Re:
A more proper name is ‘Alligator Auschwitz’.
Re: Re: Re:
Instead of giving that camp either it’s official name, it’s widely accepted nickname, or what you (accurately) called it, I go a little bit simpler and much easier to remember: Alligator Auschwitz.
Re: Re: Re:2
Three things:
If you want to call it something else, feel free; I have no way of stopping you, and I wouldn’t even if I did. Alls I’m saying is that I prefer referring to the Dade-Collier Concentration Camp with that exact name because using the “catchier” nickname doesn’t sit right with me.
Re: Re: Re:3
FYI, the Republicans call it “Alligator Alcatraz”, not “Alligator Auschwitz”. Are you sure you’re really Stephen T. Stone, because he’s a hell of a lot smarter than that.
Re: Re: Re:
Just think! we’ve now go an official Gulag Archipelago forming in the good ol’ US of A!
This reads like an idiot’s failed attempt at comedy satire
But it’s really happening
The USA is a sick, sick nation
Surprised he just didn’t declare that all non whites, gays, and trans just all have bone spurs.
Re:
I think as the only one to have officially won his bone spurs during the Vietnam War, he’s none too willing to share the honor with anyone else.
Trump regime. Call it by its proper name already.
Re:
Make him.
Re: Re:
Just a short bit above in this comment section you suggested that people not use the official or ‘slang’ labels when it comes to america’s latest concentration camp and instead should call it something that you feel more accurately describes it, so I’m curious as to why you are pushing back so hard against someone else who’s likewise urging people to use different and what they feel is more accurate language in this case?
Re: Re: Re:
My suggestion didn’t come with a demand that Techdirt writers use that particular term. This particular troll has been demanding that Techdirt writers use “regime” when referring to the second Trump administration. Hence my challenge of “make him”: If they want their preferred term used, they need to back up their demand with action—and if they can’t do that, they might want to stop making demands they can’t force others to follow.
Re: Re: Re:2
This is an incredibly weird perspective to have. Pull your head out.
Re: Re: Re:2
‘You should use this label rather than the other one’ is now a demand?
Would you hold the same position if a TD writer decided to use the phrase ‘enhanced interrogation’ across numerous articles and someone kept popping up in the comment sections telling them to just call it torture already?
Re: Re: Re:3
TBH, I don’t think that’s the real Stephen T. Stone, but someone who’s hacked his account. After all, the real Stephen would never have the belief that the Republicans use the nickname “Alligator Auschwitz” for their concentration camp in Florida.
Re: Re:
What is your issue?
Re: Re: Re:
I don’t have issues, I have a subscription, and it goes back a few decades. 🙃
DOD has been struggling to meet recruitment quotas.
Maga will begin forcing women to have white baby boys to serve in the military.
Re:
I never understood that. You’d think white supremacists would relish the opportunity for non-whites to be willing to die for them.
I’m surprised they’re not trying to kick out the “superior” whites from the military, so the coloreds can die instead.
Re: Re:
I’m guessing they see “warriors” as a higher class. They aren’t about to bestow that prestige on who they consider inferior races.
Re: Re: 'You want me to show respect to THEM?'
I imagine it’s because serving in the military comes with social prestige and respect, neither of which they want to be associated with anyone not straight white and male.
One has to believe that the offices the Chinese and the Russians have devoted to countering US military influence have basically ceased operations. Everyone involved must be putting their feet up on their desks, turning on CNN, and saying “let him cook”. There’s nothing they could that would inflict more damage to US military power and world influence than… everything Trump does.
Re:
I’m not sure if you meant your comment as sarcasm or not, but I agree.
I still think the reason there weren’t more terrorist attacks on the US is that the terrorists decided we’re doing more damage to ourselves than the terrorists could.
Where are the DOGE kids
What a colossal waste of money!!! Where is DOGE now to call out this huge waste of money. Musk is gone, but isn’t DOGE still looking for government waste. THIS IS A HUGE DISHONORABLE WASTE OF PUBLIC MONEY.
NAVY = Never Again Volunteer Yourself
The first thing I learned in boot camp.
Also lesbians and bi people, with trans people having already been vanished from recruitment records. Let’s not forget them.
Suppose you are a conservative citizen and you think you got a bad deal – low wages, expensive housing, no health care coverage, and so on.
You can solve this in two ways. One is by demanding better wages, housing, etc. But that is a tough fight, against those who are your “betters”. The other is by demanding that folks who you see as less than you are kicked down some more. It won’t improve your bank account, but it allays your fears that those “undeserving” might overtake you on society’s ladder.
As the economy gets worse, you will need that reassurance again and again. So the Trump regime delivers. It’s a machine that runs on kicking down.
Re:
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.” — Lyndon B. Johnson
Awful, but not because they're sick
Just want to say something as an alcoholic and addict. Specifically ridiculing their problems with substance abuse is a cheap shot and is entirely unrelated. They would be shitty people with or without the substance abuse. Yeah, I know we are fuck-ups because of our problem(s). It doesn’t make us bad people and it doesn’t excuse bad behavior.
It’s also not the reason they are shitty.
Re:
No, but it’s a problem to place people with serious issues into intense long-term situations, never mind driving a country the size of the US. Not good for them, not good for the public. Did you not see the extent to which they sought to allay potential fears over some veins?
Now, drug usedoes not necessarily make one a shitty person, but it certainly can make someone incompetent, and it certainly seems to have done on multiple occasions with Hegseth and Musk.
It isn’t a cheap shot to refuse a ride from someone who is drunk, where or not they are an alcoholic. It’s not a cheap shot to question behavior of known addicts when the behavior is questionable. And while it is only a political concern, one can certainly question the hiring offamous addicts into sensitive positions which, if Democrats had done the same, the Magasphere would never have shut up about it for two seconds.
Clinton/Gore: Did you ever smoke marijuana, like 20-30 years ago? Huh?
G.W. Bush: Lol, lmao. Good Christian.
This is how you get an authoritarian ethno-nationalist military not meant to defend, but to attack your own country without question. As for defense, or more likely, projecting power, we do not need ground troops.