Trump Administration Injects Even More Bigotry Into The US Military

from the make-America-segregated-again dept

Trump claims to love the military. Of course, he loves himself even more. And he tends to view those injured, killed, or captured by enemy forces as “suckers” and “losers.” He also considers people who volunteer to serve this country as idiots, since the idea of self-sacrifice for the greater good is the antithesis of cutthroat capitalism, where only zero sum deals are acceptable.

But he’ll wave the flag, hug the flag, hold military parades on his birthday, and otherwise pretend to be the most patriotic of Americans, when he’s really just the most Trump in a long line of Trumps.

Whatever perceived failures America might have can be fixed by the art of the deal dude, if his internal delusions are to be believed. Surely the problem isn’t the nation’s inability to sincerely address its shortcomings. No, the problems are all “democrat” things, like diversity, equitable treatment, respect for other people, and tolerance of ideas that might clash with our subjective beliefs.

Trump’s return to office has ushered in a new era of revisionist history. It’s simply not enough for the alleged Leader of the Free World to suggest the liberals have us all wrong. He must write his version of history into the permanent record, whether it’s by allowing military bases to reclaim their Confederate warlord names or by insisting national parks be more blindly patriotic, rather than dispassionately presenting historical facts to visitors.

Pete Hegseth — Fox New contributor and alleged sexual harasser — now heads the military. So far, he’s having trouble commanding any respect, especially since he seems to view any covert military actions as chatroom fodder. Worse, he’s seemingly incapable of admitting any wrongdoing, much less taking personal responsibility for his errors. Hegseth says a lot of stupid shit about “lethality” but fails to understand the thing that makes the military work is its high level of personal accountability, something plenty of cop shops who cosplay as soldiers also fail to comprehend.

Those failures aside, what’s happening now is only going to make the military worse. And it’s going to further damage a relationship with the nation as a whole that is already well on its way to “irreparable” thanks to Trump, Hegseth, and pretty much everyone in the current administration.

While this administration is certainly hateful enough to desire a steady separation of black people from government paychecks, it’s too cowardly to start providing separate bathrooms and water fountains for non-whites. Instead, it’s going to do shady shit like this, which comes with enough implausible deniability the administration will never truly be held accountable for its not-so-on-the-sly bigotry.

The Army is preparing to roll out a new policy that could lead to soldiers diagnosed with a chronic skin condition that causes painful razor bumps and scarring to be kicked out of the service — an issue that disproportionately affects Black men.

The new guidance, expected to take effect in the coming weeks, would bar permanent shaving waivers and require medical personnel to craft formal treatment plans for affected troops, according to multiple service officials and internal documents reviewed by Military.com.

Soldiers in need of prolonged waivers may be directed to get laser treatments. Those who need shaving exemptions for more than 12 months over a two-year period could be kicked out of the Army. 

These waivers — which were created for the purpose of retaining more soldiers, especially the group that makes up nearly 25% of new recruits. People identifying as white have steadily abandoned the armed forces, dropping from 44,000 recruits in 2018 to just over 25,000 as of two years ago.

As Military.com points out, the shaving exemption was created to retain black soldiers back in the early 1970s. And while the government will be offering laser treatment, these treatments can lead to permanent scarring and/or changes in skin pigmentation.

The other argument — that trimmed beards prevent proper gas mask/respirator use — is also bullshit:

[A] 2021 study from Military Medicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal, found there’s no conclusive evidence that a well-groomed, modest beard interferes with mask function.

The only excuse offered for this transparently racist mandate by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sounds like the sort of thing uttered by a stock redneck character written by the laziest of hacks:

We kicked out good soldiers for having naked women tattooed on their arms,” Hegseth said in a March statement criticizing what he characterized as bad policy decisions by past administrations. “And today we are relaxing the standards on shaving, dreadlocks, man buns, and straight-up obesity. Piece by piece, the standard had to go — because of equity.”

When men were men and had naked women on their arms and mudflaps, says the SecDef born in 1980. “Because of equity,” says the guy who managed to land a top government job because he looked semi-sober during Fox News broadcasts and, coincidentally, had actually spent some time in the military.

But it’s not just black people Hegseth wants vanished from the military, if not history itself. It’s also gay people. No one anywhere was crying out for this supposed wrong to be righted, but here’s Johnny on the Spot doing it anyway:

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to take the rare step of renaming a ship, one that bears the name of a gay rights icon, documents and sources show.

Military.com reviewed a memorandum from the Office of the Secretary of the Navy — the official who holds the power to name Navy ships — that showed the sea service had come up with rollout plans for the renaming of the oiler ship USNS Harvey Milk.

A defense official confirmed that the Navy was making preparations to strip the ship of its name but noted that Navy Secretary John Phelan was ordered to do so by Hegseth. The official also said that the timing of the announcement — occurring during Pride month — was intentional.

Yep, everything about this sounds exactly like Hegseth and the Trump Administration, from the wholly unnecessary renaming of ship that no one had said anything about for nearly a decade to the issuing of the mandate during Pride month because otherwise people might think this is just casual bigotry, rather than deliberately targeted, maximally cruel bigotry.

This isn’t a one-off either. Hegseth wants more ships renamed. Can you guess why?

The documents obtained by CBS News also show other vessels named after prominent leaders are also on the Navy’s renaming “recommended list.” 

Among them are the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Medgar Evers. 

These are the actions of the people “leading” this nation. This is how they behave — like tyrants and bullies, rather than public servants or, you know, actual leaders. It’s a multi-trillion dollar circle jerk attended by every frat boy, himbo, bimbo, and substance abuser willing to hitch their wagon to Trump’s delusions of grandeur. Unfortunately for the people who actually make America great, we’re not only expected to cover the tab, but live in a nation that’s becoming increasingly hostile to most of the people who reside in it.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Administration Injects Even More Bigotry Into The US Military”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
39 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

'Join the US military, one day you might be a concentration camp guard!'

Nothing like mixing your bigotry and contempt for the military with a heaping dose of anti-recruitment motivation for any but the most abhorrent of people to join the US military I suppose, a real two-for-one there.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: 'Sign up for the US military! All it'll cost you is your dignity, humanity, and self-respect!'

Before Trump calling those who signed up for the military suckers and losers would have been an insult to the intelligence and self-sacrifice of those willing to sign up and risk their lives like that, but at this point anyone who still wants the job with him as their ultimate commander has well and truly earned the label he gave them.

Arijirija says:

Re:

Doncha know? Trump was the one foretold by P T Barnum in his famous prophecy: “There’s one born every minute,” though I understand in order to avoid all the unnecessary wear and tear on Trump’s Mom, he had to redial it down to “born yesterday”. As the only President certifiably born yesterday, Trump therefore makes history as the perennially youngest president of the United States, and for that matter, of any state anywhere anywhen …

Heart of Dawn (profile) says:

Next up; “menstruation affects readiness.”

Honestly though, I’m actually glad about this. Given the administration’s complete disregard for logistics (“lets get rid of any part thats not lethal”), willingness to use troops on civilians, increasing rhetoric invading allied nations, and general slide into fascism, the fewer people in the military the better.

Get the fuck out any way you can, unless you actually like the idea of working for the nazis. In that case, bad luck. You deserve it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Heart of Dawn (profile) says:

Re:

Now, I never said the choice would be simple or easy, there will be consequences either way. But it still boils down to this: you either get out now, disobey orders and get court martialled when they order you to commit atrocities, or you commit those atrocities.

And this is not some future hypothetical, they are putting people in concentration camps right now. The atrocities have already begun.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Three things:

  1. Referring to the Dade-Collier Concentration Camp as “Alligator Auschwitz” plays into the hands of the Republicans who gave that site its nickname.
  2. Calling it a concentration camp is both factually accurate and stronger against “BuT iT’s NoT a DeAtH cAmP” bullshittery from Republicans.
  3. The leaders of Dade County wanted this concentration camp (or at least had no objections to having it built there), so I say they should be made to own it for as long as it exists.

If you want to call it something else, feel free; I have no way of stopping you, and I wouldn’t even if I did. Alls I’m saying is that I prefer referring to the Dade-Collier Concentration Camp with that exact name because using the “catchier” nickname doesn’t sit right with me.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3

Referring to the Dade-Collier Concentration Camp as “Alligator Auschwitz” plays into the hands of the Republicans who gave that site its nickname.

FYI, the Republicans call it “Alligator Alcatraz”, not “Alligator Auschwitz”. Are you sure you’re really Stephen T. Stone, because he’s a hell of a lot smarter than that.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Just a short bit above in this comment section you suggested that people not use the official or ‘slang’ labels when it comes to america’s latest concentration camp and instead should call it something that you feel more accurately describes it, so I’m curious as to why you are pushing back so hard against someone else who’s likewise urging people to use different and what they feel is more accurate language in this case?

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

My suggestion didn’t come with a demand that Techdirt writers use that particular term. This particular troll has been demanding that Techdirt writers use “regime” when referring to the second Trump administration. Hence my challenge of “make him”: If they want their preferred term used, they need to back up their demand with action⁠—and if they can’t do that, they might want to stop making demands they can’t force others to follow.

n00bdragon (profile) says:

One has to believe that the offices the Chinese and the Russians have devoted to countering US military influence have basically ceased operations. Everyone involved must be putting their feet up on their desks, turning on CNN, and saying “let him cook”. There’s nothing they could that would inflict more damage to US military power and world influence than… everything Trump does.

Anonymous Coward says:

Suppose you are a conservative citizen and you think you got a bad deal – low wages, expensive housing, no health care coverage, and so on.

You can solve this in two ways. One is by demanding better wages, housing, etc. But that is a tough fight, against those who are your “betters”. The other is by demanding that folks who you see as less than you are kicked down some more. It won’t improve your bank account, but it allays your fears that those “undeserving” might overtake you on society’s ladder.

As the economy gets worse, you will need that reassurance again and again. So the Trump regime delivers. It’s a machine that runs on kicking down.

Wolfbright says:

Awful, but not because they're sick

Just want to say something as an alcoholic and addict. Specifically ridiculing their problems with substance abuse is a cheap shot and is entirely unrelated. They would be shitty people with or without the substance abuse. Yeah, I know we are fuck-ups because of our problem(s). It doesn’t make us bad people and it doesn’t excuse bad behavior.

It’s also not the reason they are shitty.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

No, but it’s a problem to place people with serious issues into intense long-term situations, never mind driving a country the size of the US. Not good for them, not good for the public. Did you not see the extent to which they sought to allay potential fears over some veins?

Now, drug usedoes not necessarily make one a shitty person, but it certainly can make someone incompetent, and it certainly seems to have done on multiple occasions with Hegseth and Musk.

It isn’t a cheap shot to refuse a ride from someone who is drunk, where or not they are an alcoholic. It’s not a cheap shot to question behavior of known addicts when the behavior is questionable. And while it is only a political concern, one can certainly question the hiring offamous addicts into sensitive positions which, if Democrats had done the same, the Magasphere would never have shut up about it for two seconds.

Clinton/Gore: Did you ever smoke marijuana, like 20-30 years ago? Huh?

G.W. Bush: Lol, lmao. Good Christian.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...