US Marines Witnessed Detaining A US Citizen In Los Angeles

from the kicking-out-the-glass-in-the-Overton-Window dept

As Mike Masnick noted late last week while covering yet another extremely disturbing development in the ongoing horror show that is our current government, the Trump Administration isn’t fucking around. It wants to destroy America so it can have the only kind of America it’s willing to put up with: one it can rule, rather than lead.

When a federal official can announce that military forces will remain in American cities until democratically elected leaders are removed, then violently detain a Senator for asking questions about it, constitutional government has effectively ended. This isn’t creeping authoritarianism—it’s the active dismantling of democratic institutions in real time.

That federal official was DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. The democratically elected person who was violently detained for daring to interrupt Noem’s self-glorifying press conference was Senator Alex Padilla from California, who is the ranking member of a Senate subcommittee that directly oversees the DHS.

The authoritarianism isn’t creeping. It’s everywhere. But its primary focus right now is California.

First, Trump violated the law by commandeering National Guard forces that are supposed to be left to the discretion of the state they serve. In this case, 2,000 California National Guard members were sent to Los Angeles for extremely vague reasons. Unlike the massive rioting that occurred in 1992, the anti-mass deportation protests in California have been mostly peaceful with anything resembling a riot contained to a very small part of downtown Los Angeles.

Despite the lack of widespread violence and destruction, the Defense Department added 700 Marines to the mix, escalating this past the illegal hijacking of California’s National Guard (without the permission or request of the state of California) to the direct deployment of the US soldiers to help police protests that local law enforcement appeared to have pretty much fully contained without outside intervention.

That extra step is hugely problematic, especially if Marines start pitching in with law enforcement work — something they’re explicitly forbidden from doing. And yet, here they are, doing cop work for cops, something captured on video and (unbelievably) confirmed by the Defense Department:

BREAKING: US Marines deployed to Los Angeles have carried out the first known detention of a civilian, the US military confirms.It was confirmed to Reuters after they shared this image with the US military.

News Eye (@newseye.bsky.social) 2025-06-13T22:01:17.462Z

The official confirmation that US Marines are detaining people in Los Angeles was obtained by Reuters.

Asked about the incident, the U.S. military’s Northern Command spokesperson said active duty forces “may temporarily detain an individual in specific circumstances.”

“Any temporary detention ends immediately when the individual(s) can be safely transferred to the custody of appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel,” a spokesperson said.

Another photo posted at Reuters shows the man’s hands are zip-tied behind him while a Marine restrains him by holding his shoulder. The ugly irony is that the man detained by Trump’s martial law trial run is an Army veteran who obtained his US citizenship via military service and was only trying to access services at the local Department of Veterans Affairs office.

Sure, this may seem like a small thing. But only if this is the only thing you see. Trump and DoD head Pete Hegseth have sent military members to the streets of Los Angeles. Administration officials have affirmatively stated there’s no end date for this mini-occupation and have actually said OUT LOUD that the ultimate goal is to remove elected leaders that disagree with them and their efforts.

This is a direct quote of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, taken from the press conference where she stood idly by as a US senator was grabbed by armed officers and thrown to the ground:

We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into this city.

Sure, there may be a bit of performative hyperbole thrown in there. And, given that this is coming from a person who doesn’t know the definition of habeas corpus, there’s also the possibility Noem doesn’t understand some of the larger words she used during this press conference.

But make no mistake about it: if the Trump Administration thinks it can get away with a full military occupation of Los Angeles, it definitely will attempt to do it. What’s happening now is the administration testing the waters while manufacturing the provocations it needs to move forward with the next step. Shrug this isolated instance off if you dare. It’s not going to remain an anomaly for long, not when most of the Republican party is actively cheering on the use of military force against their fellow citizens.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “US Marines Witnessed Detaining A US Citizen In Los Angeles”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
34 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

You’re lying again, Koward. They ruled to extend the pause on the previous Breyer ruling while Newsom proceeds with his lawsuit against the administration.
Moreover, they said that the ruling is specifically regarding whether Trump acted within his authority. So Newsom can still challenge how the troops are being used.

And while the ruling was unanimous, it’s not as rock-solid as you make it sound:

Trump probably acted within his authority, the panel said, adding that his administration probably complied with the requirement to coordinate with Governor Gavin Newsom, and even if it did not, he had no authority to veto Trump’s directive.
[…]
The law sets out three conditions by which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a “rebellion or danger of a rebellion” against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country’s laws.
The appeals court said the final condition had probably been met because protesters hurled items at immigration authorities’ vehicles, used trash dumpster as battering rams, threw Molotov cocktails and vandalized property, frustrating law enforcement.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-court-lets-trump-retain-control-california-national-guard-now-2025-06-20/

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re:

It’s highly telling that you came here to say “it’s not been ruled illegal yet” instead of decrying the behavior itself, which is horrific regardless of whether a corrupted justice system has failed to stop it or not.

“It wasn’t illegal to turn Anne Frank over to the Nazis…”

  • Koby, time-traveling back to the 1940s, probably

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Head Kangaroo (profile) says:

Absurd

The appeals court upheld the deployment of the National Guard.

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law in 2011. The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision and allows for the detention of US citizens under certain circumstances. Temporarily detaining a US citizen for turnover to law enforcement under these circumstances is fine.

There is no VA office in that Federal building. It is primarily HUD and USCIS (immigration). The detained person was definitely not there for the reasons stated.

There was not one truthful word in this article.

Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

The appeals court upheld the deployment of the National Guard.

No, they extended a pause on a previous ruling. That’s not the same thing.

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law in 2011. The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision and allows for the detention of US citizens under certain circumstances.

Those circumstances being:

the power to detain […] any person who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners”, and anyone who commits a “belligerent act” against the United States or its coalition allies in aid of such enemy forces, under the law of war, “without trial, until the end of the hostilities authorized by the [AUMF]”.

None of that applies here, and if you think it does, you’re as constitutionally psychotic as Kristi Noem.

There is no VA office in that Federal building.

The website of the US General Services Administration says that you’re lying:

Primary tenants

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Veterans Affairs
U.S. Passport Agency

There was not one truthful word in this article.

Sort out your own lying before accusing anyone else.

That One Guy (profile) says:

'I was just following orders', take two

As always as monstrous as the regime is being do not give the military a pass here.

All the illegal orders in the world mean nothing if the military refused to comply with them, yet so far the US military both national guard and marines seem to be quite willing to occupy a US city under the direction of someone who has openly declared the regime’s intent to ‘liberate’ it from it’s current democratically elected officials, leaving them just as guilty and responsible for what has, is and will happen as the regime.

bobqoq says:

Re: just a little shade of gray

Unfortunately it is not as clear cut as we wish it would be.

As detailed in this youtube video, unless the order is very clearly illegal the soldier (and even a commissioned officier) doesn’t have much recourse but to follow the order or they take a lot of risk upon themselves.

Unfortunately trump is acting in an area that is still a little more gray than most people believe it should be. Personally, I look and see a pretty cut and dried matter that what trump is doing is illegal. But legally it isn’t at this moment cut and dry because the courts might still go either way based on whatever lies the executive branch says in court.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TwPLqGkYnBA&pp=ygUKbGVnYWxlYWdsZQ%3D%3D

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

standard tort claim, does qualified immunity apply

Restraining and moving the person probably fit pretty well within standard intentional tort claims. On the face of it, if the disgraceful Marines can be identified, they should have some liability exposure both in tort and under S:1983.

I do not know of QI being extended to military fighting statecide against citizens, and Marines are supposedly trained
* not to commit tortious acts against civilians
* not to carry out war against the US
* to uphold the Constitution

The violation would seem clear cut enough that extending QI to cover the military on these facts might be a bit of a stretch.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...