Migrant Children Are Being Added To A Criminal DNA Database Just Because
from the dehumanization-at-scale dept
Each day adds another layer of fucked-upness to this country’s anti-immigration efforts. We, as a nation, are now involved daily in extrajudicial renditioning of migrants to countries they’ve never lived in. We’re all implicated in nearly daily rejections of court orders and any remaining shred of human decency. We’re treating human beings like trash to be discarded, whether it’s mothers seeking abortions or migrants just hoping to find somewhere more stable to live.
And now we’re doing this: intermingling children in a massive criminal database for no other reason than they (or their parents) weren’t born in the United States. Here’s Dhruv Mehrotra with more details at Wired:
The United States government has collected DNA samples from upwards of 133,000 migrant children and teenagers—including at least one 4-year-old—and uploaded their genetic data into a national criminal database used by local, state, and federal law enforcement, according to documents reviewed by WIRED.
The records, quietly released by the US Customs and Border Protection earlier this year, offer the most detailed look to date at the scale of CBP’s controversial DNA collection program. They reveal for the first time just how deeply the government’s biometric surveillance reaches into the lives of migrant children, some of whom may still be learning to read or tie their shoes—yet whose DNA is now stored in a system originally built for convicted sex offenders and violent criminals.
The DOJ claims this is essential, even though it didn’t decide to start adding this particular data to the database until 22 years after its creation. According to DOJ statements, the addition of minors and migrants to a criminal database (CODIS [Combined DNA Index System], which is run by the FBI) is essential to the safety of the nation, allowing law enforcement to “assess” the threat posed by 4-year-old children to the general public due to their… um… lack of US citizenship.
The addition of migrant data dates back to the last few months of Trump’s first presidency. This went unaltered during Biden’s term.
Spanning from October 2020 through the end of 2024, the records show that CBP swabbed the cheeks of between 829,000 and 2.8 million people, with experts estimating that the true figure, excluding duplicates, is likely well over 1.5 million. That number includes as many as 133,539 children and teenagers.
The CODIS database is there to track criminals and was originally used to compile DNA samples and fingerprints only from those being criminally charged. Since then, it has been expanded to cover people who have, in many cases, done nothing more than reside in the United States without proper documentation.
People who use the term “illegal immigrants” or “illegal aliens” seem to think that being in this country without documentation is a criminal act in and of itself. And it is, but only to a certain extent. It’s a civil offense though, like not paying property taxes or getting a parking ticket. Do some of these things often enough and you might see criminal charges. But, generally speaking, no one’s getting fingerprinted and their DNA added to CODIS just because they didn’t feed the meter or fall behind on property tax payments.
For some reason, this nation has recently begun to believe it’s acceptable to treat certain civil violators like criminals if that makes it easier to deny them rights or, in this case, add them to a forever database just because there’s no court order or law preventing them from doing this.
It’s the sort of thing that dehumanizes migrants by turning them into database records. It further strips them of their humanity by adding them to a long list of actual criminals with the insinuation being that (1) they’re no less guilty than the criminals in the database, and (2) if they haven’t committed a crime yet, they’re probably going to, so why not be proactive.
For all the ugliness we’re witnessing during Trump’s second administration in terms of antipathy towards migrants, it’s important to point out that what’s been observed so far is directly attributable to Trump’s predecessor, who did nearly nothing to roll back Trump’s anti-immigrant policies.
The data, which CBP published to its website in February, shows that DNA collection accelerated under the Biden administration, with daily submissions to CODIS increasing sharply in 2024 alongside a reported rise in border apprehensions. On a single day in January 2024, for example, the Laredo, Texas, field office submitted as many as 3,930 DNA samples to the FBI—252 were listed as 17 or younger, CBP records show.
The bottom line is this: there’s no way any federal or local law enforcement officer should be adding a four-year-old to a criminal database. It’s impossible to think of any scenario where this addition is justified. For that matter, no minor who is not suspected of committing a crime should be in there either, especially if the only reason for adding them is just because the opportunity (detention by immigration officers) presented itself. A civil infraction is not a criminal offense, no matter how much three consecutive presidential administrations would prefer to believe. This is a travesty, aided and abetted by two presidents who decided the loudest, most hateful people in the nation should have a say in how immigration enforcement is carried out.
Filed Under: cbp, codis, criminal database, data, dhs, dna, doj, migrants, privacy


Comments on “Migrant Children Are Being Added To A Criminal DNA Database Just Because”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
And It's A Felony
Using non-relative children to gain sympathy to cross the boarder, as well as child trafficking immediately come to mind.
Re:
Koby, two questions for you.
Have you turned yourself in for speeding and jay walking?
At what point does two wrongs not make a right connect for you?
Re:
The children still aren’t criminals. Try again.
Re:
(source: Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946 – April, 1949 [Vol. 4])
You are so incredibly close to sounding like a Nazi, you fucking sociopathic weirdo. Maybe reconsider holding the positions you do, or at least being so public about them.
Also: Please fuck off forever. Mike really should’ve sent your posts to the spamfilter like he did with Hyman Rosen a long, long time ago.
Re: Re:
This is the really awful part. It’s already bad enough that he’s a bootlicking authoritarian sycophant, but he also eagerly shows up to defend every single atrocity and rights violation. He wastes his own life coming up with bullshit explanations about how everything is fine and there’s nothing to see here, that every victim actually deserves their extra-legal fate at the hands of his dear leader. If he want to maintain even the least semblance of decency, he’d just not comment on the worst examples, and yet here he is gleefully letting us know he would have turned Anne Frank in.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
I’ve been curious as to who controls free speech in the US, now I know, Stephen Too Stoned. Also admitting it is Mike rather than the spam filter not letting comments through.
6/19 6:11 pm est
Re: Re: Re:
You’re welcome to exercise your free speech rights on your own website. Mike isn’t a government agent. The 1st Amendment only protects your right to free speech from violation by the government. Other people can tell you to fuck off away from their property.
Re:
Diddling kids is also a felony, but you Republican fucks won’t stop doing it or covering it up. So don’t pretend that you care about the welfare of kids. Especially after voting a predator into office that openly bragged about looking at minors in compromising positions, objectified his daughter, and openly admitted to asulting young women.
The only thing you fucking pedos want is more fucking complaint victims.
Re:
Fuck of Nazi scum
Well that’s not very small government of them.
”’ DNA Samples will ‘eventually’ be required by the Feds from ALL persons in the U.S. — as a routine requirement to get government services.
The government wants to know everything about you, and DNA is the ultimate form of personal ID.
a “NATIONAL ID CARD” was generally considered grossly abhorrent and illegal in recent years — but now Americans meekly accept the “REAL ID” tyranny of the Feds.
DNA will foolow that clear trend with a mandatory Federal database, within 30 years.
Re:
Religious conservatives once thought of such an idea as “the mark of the beast”. Now they hail it as a means of “protecting the country” or somesuch. It’d be hilarious if those nutbags weren’t so hell-bent on wrecking the country’s secular institutions in favor of a religious theocracy.
Re: Re:
So, it turns out the were right about the mark of the beast after all — but ironically, it happens that they themselves are willing servants to, and devoted adherents of, that very Beast which they claimed to fear.
That’s a lot of fucking DNA to process.
Weird how they still have backlog (fogotten, ignored) DNA from SA and CSA.
Re:
Hate to break it to you, but it’s the traffickers who are the criminals, not the children.
Re: Re:
And did AC even try to say otherwise? What a weird thing for you to try and imply.
Re: Re: Re:
AC tried to justify taking DNA samples of minors by referring to criminals (unless they just threw in an assertion only tangentially related to the point of the article). So either they want to take DNA samples of non-criminals, or they think the children are criminals.
Re: Re: Re:2
Or, read another way, AC was saying it’s weird how the authorities (which should not have authority over anything, IMHO) are collecting the DNA of migrants innocent of any crime when there’s a backlog of DNA from actual crimes waiting to be processed. But then, I didn’t read AC’s comment with the idea that migrant children are criminals in my mind.