CDC Decides America’s Children Could Do With More Lead In Their Blood

from the won't-somebody-poison-the-children!?! dept

With all the conversations we’ve had in the past few months about the decline of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the leadership, or lack thereof, of RFK Jr. and Donald Trump, you might have been left with the impression that everything at HHS is broken beyond repair. But that’s not entirely true. Despite the rash of budget, staff, and grant cuts that have kneecapped HHS, you can still get a great deal of information from the HHS website, for instance. As an example, here is the CDC site’s page providing information about lead poisoning in the country. It describes how the agency began measuring blood lead levels (BLLs) nationally in 1995 to find where elevated BLLs exist, especially in children, in order to deploy federal resources to combat its occurrence. The CDC page has this to say about BLLs generally in terms of their impact on children.

There is no known safe BLL. Exposure to lead can seriously harm a child’s health. Millions of children are being exposed to lead in their homes, increasing their risks for:

  • Damage to the brain and nervous system
  • Slowed growth and development
  • Learning and behavior problems (e.g., reduced IQ, ADHD, juvenile delinquency, and criminal behavior)
  • Hearing and speech problems

Well, I’m no doctor, but gosh golly gee, that seems bad! Like, the kind of thing a federal government that has protecting its own population as a supposed chief aim would want to combat. And, in touting its own progress on that same page, the CDC agreed at the time the page was written in 2024.

The decrease is most likely a result of an intense coordinated effort to control or eliminate lead sources in children’s environments by:

  • Government officials
  • Healthcare and social service providers
  • The communities most at risk

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is a child agency of HHS, has its own page on the topic as well. There they talk again about how this was historically a much larger problem, but one that still remains and needs to be addressed through a coordinated and likely federal effort.

Researchers estimate that half of the U.S. population, more than 170 million people, were exposed to harmful lead levels in early childhood. “The scope of such widespread exposure, particularly from the late 1950s to the early 1980s, suggests the legacy of lead continues to shape the health and wellbeing of the country in ways we do not yet fully understand,” according to the researchers. Lead exposure is associated with IQ loss, for which even small deficits can have a meaningful adverse effect on people’s lives and on society.

The Biden-Harris Administration actively works to protect communities from lead exposure. More than 9 million homes, schools, daycares, and businesses receive their drinking water through a lead pipe, putting people at risk of lead exposure. A whole-of-government effort is deploying resources across federal, state and local governments to address lead hazards. Read more in this May 2024 brief: $3 Billion to Replace Toxic Lead Pipes and Deliver Clean Drinking Water to Communities Across the Country.

There’s not a lot of ambiguity in any of this. Lead poisoning and any level of BLLs, particularly in children, are problems worthy of combatting. To say that we don’t want lead in the blood of our children ought to be as uncontroversial a position as one can take. And, yet, it appears that one of the victims of HHS’ budget slashing is the very program designed to help local communities, particularly those in poorer areas.

On April 1, the staff of the CDC’s Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program was terminated as part of the agency’s reduction in force, according to NPR. The staff included epidemiologists, statisticians, and advisors who specialized in lead exposures and responses.

The cuts were immediately consequential to health officials in Milwaukee, who are currently dealing with a lead exposure crisis in public schools. Six schools have had to close, displacing 1,800 students. In April, the city requested help from the CDC’s lead experts, but the request was denied—there was no one left to help.

That Milwaukee example is an interesting one, as it offers us yet another opportunity to watch RFK Jr. simply obfuscate and/or lie in response to it. In a hearing, members of Congress asked RFK Jr. directly about the Milwaukee issue. Kennedy assured those lawmakers that he had a crackerjack team from HHS on the ground in the city working on this. Turns out, not so much.

Milwaukee Health Commissioner Mike Totoraitis told NPR that this is false. “There is no team in Milwaukee,” he said. “We had a single [federal] staff person come to Milwaukee for a brief period to help validate a machine, but that was separate from the formal request that we had for a small team to actually come to Milwaukee for our Milwaukee Public Schools investigation and ongoing support there.”

Kennedy has also previously told lawmakers that lead experts at the CDC who were terminated would be rehired. But that statement was also false. The health department’s own communications team told ABC that the lead experts would not be reinstated.

Look, I realize that we’re in a brave new world in which Trump officials can just do whatever they want, say whatever they want, and that they all have an expectation that they are untouchable. But at some point, there have to be consequences for a Cabinet member sitting before Congress and lying through his teeth. Hearings. Inquiries. Charges for contempt of Congress, or for lying under oath. Something. Anything.

Children are suffering and will suffer even worse because of this nonsense, all while Kennedy plays “pin the tail on my own bullshit” with lawmakers. This simply cannot go on.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “CDC Decides America’s Children Could Do With More Lead In Their Blood”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
55 Comments
Kinetic Gothic says:

Re:

This is an actual argument the nutcases make, claiming that they banned lead paint in so that the cabal could poison or control us with EMF , like wi-fi or 5g

The fact that lead doesn’t do a good job blocking radio waves doesn’t stop them from making the argument

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/apr/13/facebook-posts/lead-paint-was-banned-protect-kids-not-expose-them/

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Eva Maris (profile) says:

CDC Decides America’s Children Could Do With More Lead In Their Blood

It’s deeply concerning that the CDC would appear to ease regulations around acceptable lead levels in children’s blood, especially when there’s overwhelming scientific consensus that no amount of lead exposure is safe for children. Lead is a potent neurotoxin, and even low levels can cause irreversible damage to brain development, behavior, and learning ability.

If this decision is being made in the interest of industry or due to regulatory pressure, it’s a clear abdication of public health responsibility. Children—especially those in low-income and marginalized communities—are already disproportionately exposed to environmental hazards. Raising the “acceptable” threshold doesn’t solve the problem; it merely hides its severity.

The CDC should be doubling down on prevention, funding remediation efforts, and strengthening protections, not relaxing them. Public trust in health institutions depends on science-based policy—not political convenience.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Here’s a fun question to think about: If Republicans are so worried about children being exposed to lead, why aren’t they helping to speed up the replacement of lead-lined pipes in Flint, Michigan?

The answer is that they don’t give a shit about life because most of them are only concerned about the afterlife and seeming “godly” enough to get into Heaven. It’s also why they don’t care about climate change, preventing/curing communicable diseases, and other things that would actually give people a future to look forward to. “Why should we care about the future,” they ask, “if we’re all going to die anyway?”

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Here’s a fun question to think about: If Republicans are so worried about children being exposed to lead, why aren’t they helping to speed up the replacement of lead-lined pipes in Flint, Michigan?

Fact check: Democrats have controlled the Michigan governorship, the Flint city mayor, and the Flint city council since 2019, when the city came out of bankruptcy receivership.

Despite controlling everything, and being successfully sued by local residents who demanded that leaded pipes get replaced, the local progress towards actually replacing the infrastructure is crawling at a snails pace. If you have a problem with that, you need to turn to the people who have been in charge for the past 6 years, the Democrats.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

Democrats have controlled the Michigan governorship, the Flint city mayor, and the Flint city council since 2019, when the city came out of bankruptcy receivership.

And? Republicans could choose to actually help move things along by pressing for quicker replacement or raising funds for helping replace the pipes faster or literally anything other than sitting on their hands. Hell, since the Flint issue has been an issue for more than a decade now, Donald Trump could’ve helped pushed for quicker replacement in his first term⁠—possibly even with the help of federal funding/workers. But he didn’t do fuck-all about it because, like his Republican brethren going back to at least Ronald Reagan, he doesn’t give a shit about poor and/or Black people.

I’m not trying to downplay the complacency of the Democrats. Their heel-dragging on this sucks. But when was the last time you heard a Michigan Republican, a Congressional Republican, or even Donald Trump himself say anything that sounds like they have a sincere desire to fix the pipes in Flint?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4

There are literally no Republicans in the executive branch in power in Michgan. The locals already have the money and the legal mandate to do the installation, but it hasn’t happened.

As for the Federal branch, just as Joe Biden didn’t come running to the rescue, Trump can’t either. No bureaucrat in Washington owns a trench digger. No DC consultant is going to drive to Michigan with a truck full of new pipes. Noone from the EPA or CDC has more than a 50% chance of correctly identifying the business end of a shovel. The only workers who are going to start digging will be hired by the city of Flint itself.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5

There are literally no Republicans in the executive branch in power in Michgan.

What’s stopping them from going to the news and talking about how the Dems are dragging their heels on the matter? What’s stopping them from holding protests against the heel-dragging Dems in areas affected by the lead pipes? What’s stopping them from doing literally anything to show support for the people affected by this issue and press to have the issue resolved sooner rather than later?

(The answer to all three is like I already said: They don’t give a shit about poor and/or Black people.)

As for the Federal branch, just as Joe Biden didn’t come running to the rescue, Trump can’t either.

Let’s assume that the President can’t “run to the rescue”. They can still make the issue a priority for the people of Michigan by continuing to keep the issue alive in the press. Sure, Biden didn’t do anything about it⁠—but neither did Trump. And considering Trump was the president from January 2017 to January 2021, right smack dab in the middle of the lead pipe issue being an issue, he could’ve easily kept pressing Michigan Dems to get the issue fixed. Hell, he’s threatened to strip federal funding from California over a single trans athlete; why the fuck isn’t he making the same threats at Michigan for refusing to fix an issue of far, far, far, far, far more importance than one trans person maybe winning a sporting event? (Again, that’s a rhetorical question.)

Noone from the EPA or CDC has more than a 50% chance of correctly identifying the business end of a shovel.

Well, you won’t have to worry about either of those institutions being a thing soon enough if Trump has his way. Of course, when that results in rollbacks on pollution regulations and a new pandemic that could’ve been prevented with scientific research…well, just remember: The death cult prefers death to life, and that means anything that extends life is less preferable to everything that shortens it.

And remember: You voted for that. You voted for the end of the EPA, CDC, NOAA, and Department of Education. You voted for the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants⁠—which means you also voted for the blackbagging of people off the street by masked thugs who may or may not be federal agents (or working with federal agents). You voted for the cancellation of contracts with universities and research centers that are working on scientific breakthroughs such as treatments for cancers and HIV/AIDS. You voted for everything horrible that the Trump administration is doing to the United States and its people, and you don’t get to say otherwise. After nearly a decade of Trump and the GOP telling you exactly who they are, you knew who they were when you went in the voting booth last November and you voted for them anyway. Their cruelty was your desire; the end result of that cruelty is your burden to bear. My conscience is clean because I voted for Kamala. What’ll be your excuse when ICE agents kill an innocent person and Trump pardons them for “doing their job”?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:6

Republicans may have found a key weakness in Democrats, in that Democrats are so bad at managing things at the local level, that Democrats want to blame Republicans for not saving Democrats from themselves.

Let’s do more of it!

It is my understanding that the BBB funding bill which is currently in congress expands on this concept. It eliminates the federal level, and gives a bunch of money directly to states for various purposes, such as infrastructure, health care, education, and welfare. Then the states themselves will be in charge of their own destiny. States that squander the money will resort to blaming others for “cruelty”, while states that actually deliver results will experience population growth, from blue state refugees.

So change your tune and start spending money the smart way. Big daddy federal government might not be coming to the rescue ever again.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:7

Republicans may have found a key weakness in Democrats, in that Democrats are so bad at managing things at the local level, that Democrats want to blame Republicans for not saving Democrats from themselves.

And when Republicans get back in power in Michigan, do you think they’re going to be any better on the issue of fixing the lead pipes? Because experience leads me to believe they’re going to give more of a shit about rich people than poor people, which leads me to believe they’ll drag their heels on fixing the pipes as well. But please, show me a Michigan Republican who is actually trying to get that shit done. I’ll wait.

change your tune and start spending money the smart way

You mean like how our Republican president cancelled contracts for scientific research into disease treatment and prevention because those contracts were with universities and research centers that he considered “woke”? That kind of spending money “the smart way”?

You’re not as smart as you think you are, Koby. You’re advocating for the federal government to effectively give up helping states with nationally coordinated efforts when those efforts are needed⁠—like, say, when a state needs help fighting wildfires or needs a hand in the cleanup and reconstruction of an area hit hard by a hurricane or tornado. If you truly believe the federal government shouldn’t give a shit about the states and let them fend for themselves (and it seems that you do), why the fuck do we need a United States federal government for anything?

Rocky (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

So tell me shit for brains, how do you know it was “a pack of bureaucrat consultants” that was going to Michigan? My guess you don’t know anything at all and just lied like the piece of shit you are You are in a cult, a cult that makes you stupid beyond all reason so you have to lie in the face of factual reality.

I doubt you even know anything about the specialists needed for lead abatement, this is abundantly clear because you had to lie to fill the gaps in your knowledge.

It’s clear you don’t give a shit about children being exposed to lead, you are more interested in making up lies for your death-cult because you can’t honestly defend what’s going on.

You are stupid, a liar, a death-cult cheerleader and a troll. I hope you get everything you deserve.

Anonymous Coward says:

any level of BLLs, particularly in children, are problems worthy of combatting.

I believe that’s untrue, and the CDC’s page is misleading. Zero is an acceptable and safe level. I mean, technically it’s not “safe” in that one could still be hit by a truck or something, but there’s a reason that zero is always the level we’re targeting.

The way the CDC words this, there’s no need to do anything, because zero is just another dangerous level of lead.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

I seem to remember Mike & Co. saying that lax to zero content moderation means your site becomes an unpleasant mess to be on. And I’d consider trolls being allowed to continue to post shit, and other people with zero self-control feeding those trolls, to where it results in 20 posts in this comment section as of this writing hidden in the replied to one of those trolls, to be rather unpleasant and not productive for discussion.

Rocky (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I can only guess from your argument that you equate “content moderation” with “ban people” and not banning people is the same as “lax to zero content moderation”, and that makes me conclude that you haven’t understood anything at all of what Mike has actually said about content moderation and how different sites have different approaches depending on what the goal is with the moderation.

I also have to ask, when you see this text: This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it., is someone forcing you to click it? You must know what awaits you if you open a hidden thread, don’t you?

ECA (profile) says:

Sorry to say

This has been a long time coming. The Poison ban started in 1978.
And everything passed that Time is a BLUR. 45 years of this and they STILL have not gotten RID of the lead. Its a minor Test to do and in most cases, replacing the OLD LEAD PIPES would have been Easy back in the 80’s.
But, between the Fed, the State and City..it Gets passed over, and OVER and OVER.
OH I forgot to say…LEAD LINED SEWER PIPES…WONDERFUL THINGS..

ECA (profile) says:

Re: have to add

WHO here understands HOW USA regulations are..and ARE MADE?
How many holes can you add to a regulation??
Lead/copper Pipe restrictions were Added, and there are So many Holes..
Started 1991.
TRY recent.
“EPA’s 2021 Revised Lead and Copper Rule improves protections for children and communities from the risks of lead exposure by better protecting children at schools and child care facilities, identifying lead service lines, and empowering communities through information.”

” EPA’s 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI) better protects communities from exposure to lead in drinking water. Find supporting materials for states and public water systems.”

Any comments of the Stupidity, are welcome.

“lead concentrations exceed an action level of 15 ppb or copper concentrations exceed an action level of 1.3 ppm in more than 10% of customer taps sampled, the system must undertake a number of additional actions to control corrosion.”

Rocky (profile) says:

Re:

Maybe, exposure to lead causes neurological damage in various ways which can give rise to symptoms that are similar to what someone with autism can exhibit but so far no one has proved a direct link.

There was one very poor study done were the author said there was a link but it only had few subjects and no control croup at all. The author of the study was a woman who has a medical degree but choose to practice alternative medicine instead.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

I mean, if we went off the kind of bad use of statistical correlation they like to use, surely one would have to conclude that lead PROTECTS against autism, after all, autism cases have been rising as lead exposure has fallen.

Jury’s still out on the causal relationships between autism and Pirates, though.

That One Guy (profile) says:

They lie because they know they can get away with it

But at some point, there have to be consequences for a Cabinet member sitting before Congress and lying through his teeth. Hearings. Inquiries. Charges for contempt of Congress, or for lying under oath. Something. Anything.

Unfortunately it would seem that certain federal judges aren’t the only ones with a public humiliation fetish, I mean I can’t imagine why else members of congress would accept being shown to be spineless chumps on a national if not global scale as the people they’re hearing from repeatedly lie to their faces with no consequence.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...