The War On Internet Phone Calls
from the times-have-changed dept
Today Microsoft shut down Skype, a company that helped revolutionize phone calls online. To commemorate the death of Skype, we’re running a recent “Pessimist’s Archive” article on the history of internet calls, and how it almost wasn’t allowed. If you’re not already, you should subscribe to the Pessimist’s Archive.
It used to cost money to call someone, and if that someone was in another country – you would pay a premium: in the mid-90s a prime time call to Paris from New York cost around $113 an hour (in 2025 dollars)
Then came the internet, paving the way for cheap and free calls to and from anywhere in the world… Guess what? Traditional long-distance telephone companies felt threatened.

In 1995, the internet had just 16 million users — but it was enough to make online phone calls useful. That year, startup VocalTec launched the first commercial internet phone software, amusingly named ‘i-phone’ (short for internet phone.) It quickly caught on with early web users, offering cheap long-distance calls – partly thanks to being exempt from FCC tariffs like local access charges. This prompted action from incumbents, who deemed it unfair.

In 1996 America’s Carriers Telecommunications Association (ACTA) – representing over 300 of them – filed a petition with the FCC that sought to ban the sale of long distance internet telephone services until they were regulated as ‘common carriers.’ The internet friendly Clinton Administration would oppose the petition – but it was up to the FCC to make a final ruling.

The Backlash
This is when the nerds stepped in: web browser pioneer Marc Andreessen told The San Francisco Examiner that his browser – Netscape – would build online calling into a future software update seemingly in protest (the feature never materialized.)
“Are we hurting their ability to charge you $10 for a long-distance phone call? Tough bananas” – Harvey Kaufman, vice president of NetSpeak Corp.
Jeff Pulver – an early i-phone user, who’d started a popular mailing list for online phone enthusiasts, would take it upon himself to lead the resistance. Prior to the FCC petition he launched the first online telephone network called ‘Free World Dialup’ (using the VocalTec system.) His mailing list turned into the ‘Voice on the Net coalition’: a group of internet phone enthusiasts and tech startups building out the technology.

This rag tag bunch of innovators would cobble together a lobbying effort to fight incumbents and allow this nascent technology to flourish…

In the following 8 years the VON coalition would fend off various attempts to rein in the technology, while the FCC would hold off ruling on the ACTA petition (VON is still operating today.)
1998 would see the FCC make a number of statements sympathetic to online phone services – meanwhile iphone.com would host an effort to petition lawmakers against online phone services. It isn’t clear if this was a real grassroots effort, or an astroturfed one by traditional phone providers…

In 2000 a bill passed the US house of representatives preventing phone companies charging by the minute for internet access – but it excluded internet telephony services. This prompted Jeff Pulver and his VON coalition to organize the ‘Internet Freedom Rally’ in Washington DC. It would feature the chairman of the FCC and classic rock performances.

In 2004 the FCC would finally rule on the ACTA petition after 8 years – but not before the Justice Department asked for a delay on a decisions until online phones call could be as easily wire tapped as regular calls. The FCC would make its final ruling dubbed the ‘Pulver Order’ allowing for cheap and free online phone calls to anywhere in the world we take for granted today.

This is a good example of how incumbents will try to use old rules to thwart competition enabled by new technologies – had the long distance telecoms companies succeeded, services like Facebook and Google might not be able to offer free voice and video calls globally.
Filed Under: fcc, phone calls, regulations, skype, voice on the net, voip, von


Comments on “The War On Internet Phone Calls”
Ha, my father was in on trying to market the iphone. Had one on his desk.
Apple always cracks me up with their reused trademarks.
So, they tried to get phone calls over the internet banned because…they wanted more money.
They wanted their little piece of paper, the one that says ‘This is a measure of how much goods/services we’ve given to our community’ to have a slightly bigger number written on it.
And in order to get that bigger number, they were willing to lie and bluster and complain, until this other invention, one that could improve peoples’ lives for minimal extra effort, was either prohibited, or weighed down with fees to force consumers into frugality.
Re:
Showing that their current business model goes all the way back to before the World Wide Web was widely available. Dinosaurs indeed.
An Elegy for Skype
RIP, Skype.
You lived up to all the hype.
I made calls that went against the rules
To take money from horny fools.
Oft my account did you flag,
But never did my business lag.
For always i could sign back in,
And I considered it quite the win.
Dearest Skype you will be in my heart.
You did your part.
But the valley says “no nice for people ever,”
So maybe one day their heads I will sever.
Do you remember the good old days, when Skype was independently owned; and puppies and startups and baby goats with big dreams frolicked in the meadows of Silicon Valley; and then Microsoft bought it, and made it terrible?
Pepperidge Farms remembers.
Re:
M & A are the tools of the devil.
Re: Re: INVESTMENTS
YASAC writes:
The “Devil” is what you tell children and Southerners to scare them. It’s not a thing.
That having been said,
When people invest in a retirement account, whether through the stock market, IRA, 401(k), union fund, etc. they are putting money IN to be able to take MORE MONEY OUT at some later time.
The market rewards GROWTH more than PROFIT. That’s just how it is. The market doesn’t reward increasing the bottom line as much as increasing the top line.
So M&A is the “Easy Button™” for companies to raise that top line. I didnt create this “method” and I’m not rationalizing it. I’m explaining it.
So at the end of the day if you’re a public company already — or — soon to go public, top-line revenue is key to a higher valuation. M&A gets you there quicker, benefits all parties, including the putative investors.
So M&A may be the tools of the devil, but since he doesn’t exist, has no tools, and M&A are top-line revenue improvements that make everyone in the deal happy, that is unlikely to change.
Devil. It’s a freakin’ hot sauce. Put some on your wings and stop obsessing.
Re: Re: Re:
And you claim to be Jewish.
Re: Re: Re:2
How to tell you didn’t read the article you linked in one easy step.
Re: Re: Re:3
How to tell you didn’t read the article AC linked to in one step that must have been so hard for you.
Re: Re: Re:2 NO TD IS NOT ABOUT ME
YASAC writes in response to my comment:
First TD is not about me, nor is this thrad about me. Second, I’ve never claimed to be anything. I’m a poster on this forum, here to discuss … checks topic The War on Internet Phone Calls.
KTB
PEPPERIDGE FARM REMEMBERS
Well there’s your FamGuy ref 😉
Seriously Skype was always an outlier. It was the AIM that wasn’t ever good enough. There was
– AIM
– YM
– Skype
Skype did let you interconnect to the PSTN but you had to give up your first born to sign on, and your second born to make calls, and audio quality was horrible. Of course it was Windows only, and sound quality and call completion was so bad nobody but Microsoft would want it.
At the same time VoD was improving CODECs so that porn could be sent over those same links. RealVideo was a thing, as was Geocities (see images above in the original article!) VoIP was not yet great, almost usable, and PSTN access a joke.
Then jump forward to lower latency connections as “broadband” replaced modems. Now add in SIP (popular around 2002-2004) and true voice quality was there. Asterisk, (shout out to Markster), and other FOSS allowed rapid deployment. IAX made it more of a success than individual 5ESS DMS200, DMS100 etc.)
Skype was never a player. Kind of like “Teams”. Nobody uses Teams in real life. They use Zoom.
But corporate PR goons make up their own histories, so I guess Skype was one big winner. Which is why it got shut off. Don’t worry, you still have Teams.
Soon to shut down.
Re: ms teams considered unhelpful
Actually, some courts do use MS Teams for remote hearings. It sometimes works. Sometimes it does not. My experience has been generally unfavorable.
Remember, MS Teams comes from the same people who brought you the MS Bing search enginge, and the MS Bob office productivity suite.
Viva le SIP
Back to the ground floor and learning more.