South Dakota Republicans: Let’s Start Jailing Librarians
from the book-burning-alternative-that-treats-librarians-like-witches dept
This stupid state. These stupid legislators. This goddamn constituency.
This is my current home state. And it is painful to be here.
Kristi Noem is now the head of the DHS, presumably because she never asked what this country could do for her, but instead asked “what can I do for Donald Trump?” She kept asking this question even though no one was really expecting an answer during the Biden administration. Then she allowed her constituents to be ravaged by floods because she’s already spent too much money sending South Dakota National Guard troops to Texas to “defend the border.”
The state legislature contains a vast Republican majority, as it has for years. But rather than limiting themselves to turning South Dakota into the world’s foremost inland offshore banking site, they’re now just following their (Dear) leaders. Performative cruelty is the name of the game. And the latest move is to criminalize the act of being a librarian, as Joshua Haiar reports for the last truly independent source of local journalism, South Dakota Searchlight.
In a move that one lawmaker said would lead to “locking up librarians,” South Dakota legislators advanced a bill 38-32 on Thursday at the Capitol in Pierre that would remove legal protections for libraries and other institutions if children view books that meet the legal definition of “harmful to minors.”
The bill would repeal an exemption shielding libraries, schools, universities, museums and their employees from prosecution under laws regulating obscenity and dissemination of material harmful to children. Without the exemption, people who work for those entities could be subjected to prosecutions resulting in a year of jail time and a $2,000 fine.
Librarians have normally been given a pass here because no librarian actively stocks what most people would consider to be pornographic material. But now there are plenty of politicians and special interest groups pretending content that has been carried by libraries for years is now “obscene” simply because they don’t like the content. These efforts almost exclusively target LGBTQ+ content, with legislators pretending any depiction of alternative sexuality is de facto porn.
Rep. Bethany Soye is one of those people. She’s a Republican representing the state’s largest city, Sioux Falls. She was also instrumental in the passing of an age-verification bill that would subject any website to legal action and fines if even a single pornographic image is hosted by it.
Other Republicans are more logical than Rep. Soye. While Soye claims this just prevents librarians from lending porn to kids (something that never happens), Republic lawmaker Drew Petersen says the wording of bill allows prosecutors to target librarians for doing nothing more than being helpful librarians. And another Republican lawmaker stated this law does nothing at all to make South Dakota great again.
“If a librarian accidentally allowed a student to take an anatomy book home or an encyclopedia with a picture of a naked human being, they could potentially be charged with a year in jail,” Peterson said. “That’s why I am voting no.”
Rep. Will Mortenson, R-Fort Pierre, also opposed the measure.
“We’re locking up librarians,” Mortenson said. “Folks, we’re not growing the state. We’re not helping our people. We’re locking up librarians in this bill.”
Soye, of course, had her own take on the issue, one that’s just as incoherent as you’d expect from someone who thinks it’s a good idea to criminalize an entire internet just because some kid might stumble across some porn somewhere.
In her closing arguments, Soye rejected claims that the bill criminalizes librarians.
“Just because there’s a penalty for something, does that mean you’re criminalizing someone?” she asked.
HOLY FUCK, SOYE! THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THAT MEANS! When you create a criminal penalty for an act that previously had no criminal penalty, you are — BY FUCKING DEFINITION — criminalizing that act. Calling this response idiotic is an insult to idiots everywhere. This is, by far, one of the worst defenses of anything ever — so terrible I’m on the verge of going full Godwin on it. This is incredibly dumb shit being said by someone who’s so far up their own bigotry they can’t even recognize their own blatant contradictions.
It’s not a law yet. Unfortunately, it’s headed to the state senate, which is just as heavily stocked with Republicans and just as willing to violate constitutional rights so long as it makes the frothiest of their fellow lawmakers and constituents momentarily happy.
Filed Under: 1st amendment, bethany soye, book ban, censorship, free speech, libraries, republicans, south dakota


Comments on “South Dakota Republicans: Let’s Start Jailing Librarians”
— Gene Wilder as the Waco Kid, “Blazing Saddles”
“Just because someone is a felon, does that mean you’re putting in prison?” she’d better ask.
Re: 'Only if they're not republicans'
Perhaps not the best example, in the republican party they elect those people.
Re: Re:
With Trump being the prime example that backs your assertion.
Easy solution
All public libraries and museums are designated “Adults-only”.
K-12 school libraries are closed permanently.
Hope those South Dakota universities (and businesses that rely upon knowledge workers) are going to be recruiting from out-of-state, because soon no SD High School graduate will be literate.
Re: Those darn books...
And, by chance, if any SD HS grads are literate, they will make a beeline out-of-state for college.
Re:
South Dakota colleges and universities will also have to become 18+, with no minors allowed on campus.
Re:
We should designate the South Dakota legislature as adults only, then all the people in favor of this kind of law would be expelled from office.
And soon enough, they’ll go after librarians who lead kids to books about the uncensored history of this country (e.g., slavery, Jim Crow, opposition to the Civil Rights Movement, the genocide of Native Americans).
Re:
Those charges will also be porn related.
Re: Re:
“You showed a kid pictures of people in chains? Obviously that’s a bondage fetish! And all of those people being Black is a racial component to that fetish, which means it’s also a DEI thing, and that makes this three times as bad! Off to prison with you, you dirty smut peddler!” — South Dakota Republicans, probably
Sigh
Before the librarians are locked up, the legislators should ask their librarians to help them find Fayetteville Public Library v. Crawford County, Arkansas, 2024 WL 5202774 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 23, 2024), https://www.acluarkansas.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/126_-_order_granting_summary_judgment_0.pdf
Godwin's Law
I haven’t heard anyone mention Godwin’s Law in about a decade (other than to state that is no longer applies).
Re:
“In 2023, Godwin published an opinion in The Washington Post stating ‘Yes, it’s okay to compare Trump to Hitler. Don’t let me stop you.’ In the article, Godwin says ‘But when people draw parallels between Donald Trump’s 2024 candidacy and Hitler’s progression from fringe figure to Great Dictator, we aren’t joking. Those of us who hope to preserve our democratic institutions need to underscore the resemblance before we enter the twilight of American democracy.'”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
The Republican legislators in South Dakota are harmful to minors…and everyone else.
We need to stop referring to them as the republican party. They should be called what they are. The American Nazi party.
Re:
Where’s the Bluesmobile when you need it?
It never ceases to amaze me how much fealty anti-“porn” zealots can swear to a man who is most famous for, among other things, cheating on his wife with a porn star and molesting women.
Re:
Most of those kinds of zealots are also religious zealots, so their seeing Trump as a
father figuresupreme arbiter of authority because he agrees with them and wants to punish both their enemies and anyundisciplined childrendissenters within the ranks usingviolencethe power of the state makes a whole hell of a lot of sense.Re: Re:
I just find it oddly fascinating. I figured at least a few might accidentally crack open a $65 Trump bible and go “Hey wait a minute. This Jesus guy is saying something completely different!”
Re: Re: Re:
Not when you remember that they’re the kinds of Christians who probably think Jesus’s teachings are too “liberal” and “weak”. 50 years of conservative Christians trying to be both the victim and the victimizer has really fucked up the American flavors of Christianity (and its Republican adherents).
Re: Re: Re:2
“Stop resisting, I’m just trying to beat my twisted morality into you. I’m so oppressed because you won’t accept my violence and authority!”
“I’m being censored for my viewpoint. I just suggested we genocide people I don’t like. Nothing weird.”
“Women belong in the kitchen…because I don’t know how to take care of or feed myself.”
Re: Re: Re:3
I have that problem because of the way my autism manifests. I do what I can for myself with whatever support I require or I just do without (starve). No way I’m expecting anybody, including women, to do things for me I can learn how to do for myself.
Well, this will certainly raise the cost of buying porn and anything related to sexuality, which will in turn raise the income for republican leaders who have invested large amounts of their stolen money in old fashioned hard copy porn pics and books.
Mission accomplished.
Re:
This is one way to revitalize the national ‘porn in the woods’ shortage.
“make South Dakota great again”
As if SD was ever great to being with.
Re:
Hey don’t knock the home of the Corn Palace.
It has murals.
Made of corn.
sounds like it would simpler if they just made “being younger than 21 years old” a state felony.
When does it go to the senate
Almost no article about this bill talks about when it goes to the senate. I have looked on the government website and it is confusing as to when the senate would vote on it. This is part of what I think transparancy should be. Making things easier for the public to access information about the law making process.
Don’t forget South Dakota’s other qualifies.
Such as (in combination with federal law) abolishing usury, abolishing the rule against perpetuities governing trusts, allowing trusts that benefits the trustor, and making trusts secret.
All things ordinary people are interested in.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws
I guess that the bible will be exempt even though it’s chock full of violence, begatting, supernatural occurrances, demons, death by the millions, misogyny on a giant scale, and one horrifically vengeful sky fairy amongst many other things?
Re: the Good Book
Hey there is NOTHING improper for children about the story of– say– King David’s son Amnon r@ping his half-sister Tamar
(2 Samuel 13)
Re: Re:
“Well, what kind of robes was she wearing?”
'So about that 'child friendly' bible of yours...'
Assuming there are any if the non-insane, non-perverts in the south dekota legislature want to torpedo this law it seems the quickest way to do so would be to make clear that it also applies to churches and any books they might expose children to.
After all if the motivation really is to protect children from ‘pornographic’ material and not just a barely-disguised attempt to ban any non-CIS, non-hetero characters or relationships then they should have no problem whatsoever with applying that to other institutions that have children showing up on the regular.
I mean it’s not like they regularly expose children to a book filled with genocide, rape, incest, human sacrifice, slavery or any other topics that would be wildly illegal under the standards they want to impose on other books…
Re:
I hope they do extend this to churches just to torpedo themselves. However they would just carve out exceptions or deflect blame.
Re: Re:
If it’s anything like past book ban laws then they’d likely respond to the question of ‘And how is the bible not in violation?’ with an exemption, yes, because even they know that is absolutely is according to their own rules and standards.