South Dakota Republicans: Let’s Start Jailing Librarians

from the book-burning-alternative-that-treats-librarians-like-witches dept

This stupid state. These stupid legislators. This goddamn constituency.

This is my current home state. And it is painful to be here.

Kristi Noem is now the head of the DHS, presumably because she never asked what this country could do for her, but instead asked “what can I do for Donald Trump?” She kept asking this question even though no one was really expecting an answer during the Biden administration. Then she allowed her constituents to be ravaged by floods because she’s already spent too much money sending South Dakota National Guard troops to Texas to “defend the border.”

The state legislature contains a vast Republican majority, as it has for years. But rather than limiting themselves to turning South Dakota into the world’s foremost inland offshore banking site, they’re now just following their (Dear) leaders. Performative cruelty is the name of the game. And the latest move is to criminalize the act of being a librarian, as Joshua Haiar reports for the last truly independent source of local journalism, South Dakota Searchlight.

In a move that one lawmaker said would lead to “locking up librarians,” South Dakota legislators advanced a bill 38-32 on Thursday at the Capitol in Pierre that would remove legal protections for libraries and other institutions if children view books that meet the legal definition of “harmful to minors.”

The bill would repeal an exemption shielding libraries, schools, universities, museums and their employees from prosecution under laws regulating obscenity and dissemination of material harmful to children. Without the exemption, people who work for those entities could be subjected to prosecutions resulting in a year of jail time and a $2,000 fine.

Librarians have normally been given a pass here because no librarian actively stocks what most people would consider to be pornographic material. But now there are plenty of politicians and special interest groups pretending content that has been carried by libraries for years is now “obscene” simply because they don’t like the content. These efforts almost exclusively target LGBTQ+ content, with legislators pretending any depiction of alternative sexuality is de facto porn.

Rep. Bethany Soye is one of those people. She’s a Republican representing the state’s largest city, Sioux Falls. She was also instrumental in the passing of an age-verification bill that would subject any website to legal action and fines if even a single pornographic image is hosted by it.

Other Republicans are more logical than Rep. Soye. While Soye claims this just prevents librarians from lending porn to kids (something that never happens), Republic lawmaker Drew Petersen says the wording of bill allows prosecutors to target librarians for doing nothing more than being helpful librarians. And another Republican lawmaker stated this law does nothing at all to make South Dakota great again.

“If a librarian accidentally allowed a student to take an anatomy book home or an encyclopedia with a picture of a naked human being, they could potentially be charged with a year in jail,” Peterson said. “That’s why I am voting no.”

Rep. Will Mortenson, R-Fort Pierre, also opposed the measure.

“We’re locking up librarians,” Mortenson said. “Folks, we’re not growing the state. We’re not helping our people. We’re locking up librarians in this bill.”

Soye, of course, had her own take on the issue, one that’s just as incoherent as you’d expect from someone who thinks it’s a good idea to criminalize an entire internet just because some kid might stumble across some porn somewhere.

In her closing arguments, Soye rejected claims that the bill criminalizes librarians.

“Just because there’s a penalty for something, does that mean you’re criminalizing someone?” she asked.

HOLY FUCK, SOYE! THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THAT MEANS! When you create a criminal penalty for an act that previously had no criminal penalty, you are — BY FUCKING DEFINITION — criminalizing that act. Calling this response idiotic is an insult to idiots everywhere. This is, by far, one of the worst defenses of anything ever — so terrible I’m on the verge of going full Godwin on it. This is incredibly dumb shit being said by someone who’s so far up their own bigotry they can’t even recognize their own blatant contradictions.

It’s not a law yet. Unfortunately, it’s headed to the state senate, which is just as heavily stocked with Republicans and just as willing to violate constitutional rights so long as it makes the frothiest of their fellow lawmakers and constituents momentarily happy.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “South Dakota Republicans: Let’s Start Jailing Librarians”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
36 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
TaboToka (profile) says:

Easy solution

All public libraries and museums are designated “Adults-only”.

K-12 school libraries are closed permanently.

Hope those South Dakota universities (and businesses that rely upon knowledge workers) are going to be recruiting from out-of-state, because soon no SD High School graduate will be literate.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

“You showed a kid pictures of people in chains? Obviously that’s a bondage fetish! And all of those people being Black is a racial component to that fetish, which means it’s also a DEI thing, and that makes this three times as bad! Off to prison with you, you dirty smut peddler!” — South Dakota Republicans, probably

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Eric Goldman (profile) says:

Sigh

Before the librarians are locked up, the legislators should ask their librarians to help them find Fayetteville Public Library v. Crawford County, Arkansas, 2024 WL 5202774 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 23, 2024), https://www.acluarkansas.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/126_-_order_granting_summary_judgment_0.pdf

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re:

“In 2023, Godwin published an opinion in The Washington Post stating ‘Yes, it’s okay to compare Trump to Hitler. Don’t let me stop you.’ In the article, Godwin says ‘But when people draw parallels between Donald Trump’s 2024 candidacy and Hitler’s progression from fringe figure to Great Dictator, we aren’t joking. Those of us who hope to preserve our democratic institutions need to underscore the resemblance before we enter the twilight of American democracy.'”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

Most of those kinds of zealots are also religious zealots, so their seeing Trump as a father figure supreme arbiter of authority because he agrees with them and wants to punish both their enemies and any undisciplined children dissenters within the ranks using violence the power of the state makes a whole hell of a lot of sense.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Not when you remember that they’re the kinds of Christians who probably think Jesus’s teachings are too “liberal” and “weak”. 50 years of conservative Christians trying to be both the victim and the victimizer has really fucked up the American flavors of Christianity (and its Republican adherents).

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

“Stop resisting, I’m just trying to beat my twisted morality into you. I’m so oppressed because you won’t accept my violence and authority!”

“I’m being censored for my viewpoint. I just suggested we genocide people I don’t like. Nothing weird.”

“Women belong in the kitchen…because I don’t know how to take care of or feed myself.”

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3

“Women belong in the kitchen…because I don’t know how to take care of or feed myself.”

I have that problem because of the way my autism manifests. I do what I can for myself with whatever support I require or I just do without (starve). No way I’m expecting anybody, including women, to do things for me I can learn how to do for myself.

Alisha Rayne says:

When does it go to the senate

Almost no article about this bill talks about when it goes to the senate. I have looked on the government website and it is confusing as to when the senate would vote on it. This is part of what I think transparancy should be. Making things easier for the public to access information about the law making process.

MightyMetricBatman says:

Don’t forget South Dakota’s other qualifies.

Such as (in combination with federal law) abolishing usury, abolishing the rule against perpetuities governing trusts, allowing trusts that benefits the trustor, and making trusts secret.

All things ordinary people are interested in.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

That One Guy (profile) says:

'So about that 'child friendly' bible of yours...'

Assuming there are any if the non-insane, non-perverts in the south dekota legislature want to torpedo this law it seems the quickest way to do so would be to make clear that it also applies to churches and any books they might expose children to.

After all if the motivation really is to protect children from ‘pornographic’ material and not just a barely-disguised attempt to ban any non-CIS, non-hetero characters or relationships then they should have no problem whatsoever with applying that to other institutions that have children showing up on the regular.

I mean it’s not like they regularly expose children to a book filled with genocide, rape, incest, human sacrifice, slavery or any other topics that would be wildly illegal under the standards they want to impose on other books…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...