Mexico Threatens To Sue Google Over ‘Gulf Of America’ Change
from the why-is-everyone-an-idiot? dept
America, which used to be a serious country run by adults, has since devolved into something else. We were just talking about how the White House had made the brilliant decision to bar AP News reporters from all kinds of official briefings. Why? Well, because the AP refused to update its influential Stylebook to refer to the Gulf of Mexico by its newly dictated and entirely made up name, the “Gulf of America.” That’s when this all moved beyond pure pettiness and into our realm, as this is both dangerous from a general freedom of speech and the press capacity, but also about as clear a First Amendment violation as you’re going to see.
But that doesn’t mean that the pettiness has ended, of course. Nor does it mean that such pettiness on an international level won’t reveal just how small too many very important world leaders are. To whit: the Mexican government has indicated that it plans to sue Google over the reflection of the name change in Google Maps. And while that sounds picayune enough on its own, you really have to read some of the comments from these government officials to appreciate just how stupid this all is.
“What Google is doing here is changing the name of the continental shelf of Mexico and Cuba, which has nothing to do with Trump’s decree, which applied only to the US continental shelf,” [President] Sheinbaum told reporters. “We do not agree with this, and the Foreign Minister has sent a new letter addressing the issue.”
Sheinbaum said the renaming is “incorrect,” adding that Trump’s decree “only changed the name within his own continental shelf, which extends 22 nautical miles from the US coast—not the entire Gulf.”
Yes, pointing out just how small and petty Trump’s executive order is would be pretty great… were it not then followed by a sovereign nation taking the time to officially send letters to Google over it. Notably, Google only really changed the naming for those searching from within the United States. If you’re in Mexico and you Google map this body of water, it’s labeled “Gulf of Mexico.” That doesn’t make the re-labeling in America any less stupid, of course, especially when you consider that in every other country beyond these two, the map will display both names. As though they were historically co-equal.
Again, very stupid. And very small. So small, in fact, that Mexico isn’t even demanding that Google simply respect the historical name of this body of water, one that has stood for literal centuries. No, they just want Google to push the boundry back a bit.
Sheinbaum said Mexico is now sending a new letter back to Google, which reads “any reference to the ‘Gulf of America’ initiative on your Google Maps platform must be strictly limited to the marine area under U.S. jurisdiction.”
“Any extension beyond that zone exceeds the authority of any national government or private entity. Should that be the case, the Government of Mexico will take the appropriate legal actions as deemed necessary,” it added.
I promise you, Trump is absolutely delighted at this reaction. He wants this fight. His base will eat it up and the idea that Mexico is going to get anywhere legally here is absurd. Where are they going to file suit? What court would be authoritative for something like this?
And, perhaps most importantly, why can’t we just name it the “Gulf of Who Gives A Shit?” and be done with all of this?
Filed Under: claudia sheinbaum, gulf of mexico, mexico
Companies: google


Comments on “Mexico Threatens To Sue Google Over ‘Gulf Of America’ Change”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
They may have a much easier time with such a lawsuit if this latest law proposal materializes and get passed (spoilers: It’s about getting rid of section 230) :
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
..I forgot the link. https://bsky.app/profile/jmiers230.bsky.social/post/3likfnvksss2u
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
ahut up doomposter
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
we are getting tired of you doomposting about 230 seriously shut up about 230
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
I’ll stop bringing it up when lawmakers and judges stop threatening it, and the entire internet as a whole along with it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
than stop with your Misery shit with 230 no one here wants your misery posts even stephen told you to stop dooming and glooming
Re: Re: Re:2
Maybe stick to bringing it up on articles that are directly relevant to Section 230.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3
You came so close, friend.
Re: Re:
this doesn’t mean it will immediately pass
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
According to Goldmann it would, but his word also isn’t law.
Still, the sentiment against section 230 in congress is hard to decipher right now.
Re: Re: Re:2
Who is Goldmann and how would Goldmann know how easily a bill would pass?
Re: Re: Re:3
Previous commenter here. I meant to ask:
Who is Goldmann and where is your link showing this Goldmann predicting how easily the bill would pass?
Re: Re: Re:4
Not the AC you responded to, but there’s this document from over three years ago.
Re: Re: Re:5
Thanks. I am somewhat familiar with Eric Goldman’s writings, but I don’t think he wrote anything about the latest anti-section-230 bill.
An earlier part of the thread went like this:
And I hoped that the doomposter wasn’t putting words in Goldman’s mouth or talking about a different “Goldmann”.
Re: Re: Re:6
I was referring to what was mentioned regarding section 230 in this blog post: https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/01/2024-internet-law-year-in-review.htm
Re: Re: Re:7
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for the link. I do appreciate that you keep track of Section 230, but in the future please don’t pretend that Section 230 is more relevant to an Techdirt article than it really is. Google’s decision to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America was Google’s first-party speech (for now, because Trump might think of coercing Google if Google does an about face), and Mexico has its own laws.
google, like facebook, will capitulate.
Re:
Capitulate? To whom?
They’re caught between Scylla and Charybdis here.
The only way to win is to put down your copy of the Odyssey and get some perspective.
Re: Re:
And maybe a nice bottle of Cheval Blanc 1947.
I wonder which cartel lobbied the government for this.
Re:
I thought the RIAA and MPA were US-based entities…Oh wait, you mean the Mexican cartels. My bad, carry on!
And it’s still “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)” for the rest of the World in Google Map.
Meanwhile, OpenStreetMap hasn’t changed it since the new name is not used much by Americans for now.
Re:
Admittedly, most cars seldom get more than a couple lengths into the Gulf (by whatever name) before they stop.
Uh, refer back to the previous paragraph. Trump likes attention, and “who gives a shit?” is kind of the opposite of that (though still a minor Trump victory, ’cause anyone ignoring this nonsense would be calling it the Gulf of Mexico).
Just be happy that some deviously brilliant White House staffer has managed to temporarily distract Trump from shit that matters.
Uh, refer back to the previous paragraph. Trump likes attention, and “who gives a shit?” is kind of the opposite of that (though still a minor Trump victory, ’cause anyone ignoring this nonsense would be calling it the Gulf of Mexico).
Just be happy that some deviously brilliant White House staffer has managed to temporarily distract Trump from shit that matters.
Re:
That’s odd. After pressing Post the first time, I was still on the comment page, so I pressed it again… and somehow the duplicate comment detector failed.
i still like the fact that in his stupid attempt to claim dominance, Trump renamed this hurricane oil soup “Gulf of America” rather than “Gulf of the US”, which… yeah, it is the big gulf of two-plus continents known as America for specious historical reasons.
Re:
Just so you know: You know what the full name of Mexico is?
“Estados Unidos Mexicanos”
or “United States of Mexico”.
So as clownish as what Trumpy did, Mexico is also a bunch of states which are united (they even have two Californias: Baja California del Sur and Baja California del norte!).
Re: Re:
To me, “United Mexican States” is the more straightforward translation. Wikipedia says “Mexican United States” would be the most literal one.
Re: Re:
Mexico also used to own what became the American state of California, meaning that the vast majority of Spanish-speaking people there are descended from people who lived there before the state was part of the US, but that fact won’t stop Trump deporting them as ‘illegal immigrants’.
Re: Re:
Mexico invaded California?!?!?!
TRUMP WAS RIGHT!!!!
Good old MapQuest is out there the the Lord’s work
https://gulfof.mapquest.com
Re:
Done.
If the Mexican government had a sense of humor they would have passed a resolution to change the name of Texas to North Mexico.
Re:
I’ve decided to just call the state of New Mexico, New America.
Re:
It would also be funny to rename China to Western Taiwan.
Mexico missing an opportunity here.
Apparently Google said that they follow the respective laws of the country in which the maps are displayed in relation to how maps are displayed.
Mexico should take the opportunity to officially rename the United States of America to something more suitable like Little Mexico, or Moron Land.
Then they can demand that Google display this in Mexico.
This would really piss off the orange baboon.
MAGA will eat it up
Good! I’d rather have them focused on this than on anything important.
Not quite true. From Germany, it’s labeled “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)”.
Personally, I think it is a good decision to sue Google here. Not because the EO was petty and stupid, but because Google complied with it, without any resistance or legal requirement to do so. Mexico suing them might, at the very least, force the issue of whether these EO supersede actual laws.
Re:
Whelp, embarrassing, that I didn’t even read the next sentence before angrily commenting. Apologies.
Re:
But what basis is there to sue someone for following a non-legally-binding suggestion? How would that make any sense? If I suggest you take a trip to Mexico, and you like the idea and do it, should the Canadian tourism board be suing you because you didn’t protest?
Jurisdiction
I don’t see where’s the difficulty. They can start from a court in Mexico and continue from there, like Brazil did for X/Twitter. No doubt Google has already calculated such litigation risk as part of their cost of doing business in many jurisdictions.
You missed something
Apparently, Mexico is suing Alphabet to rename the aforementioned company to El Goog.
“America, which used to be a serious country run by adults, has since devolved into something else. …: No truer sentence will I read this month, maybe this year. And we wanna give our sincere thanks to the cadre of Dumbfucks, enough of them to give fat trump his 0.2% landslide mandate to take over Amerika and run it his way–this about a guy who actually went broke as a Casino Owner, for God’s sakes! Just give the average Amerikan Dumbfuck a night with Dancing With The Stars, a case of Pabst Blue Ribbon, a wife to love-slap and a dog to kick down the stairs (wife and dog being somewhat interchangeable), and he’s dumb, dumber and droolingly happy, while Stable Genius dotard fat trump does all the thinking. And of course, as a guy said to me yesterday: when someone invests $250 Million into an enterprise, he thus owns the enterprise (looking at you, Muskrat!). So we are all now beholden to a South African Apartheid magnate with questionable immigration status, as my fellow oldpharrt seniors try to imagine what and how we’ll do without the Social Security fortunes, into which we paid for forty-to-sixty years running. Have a Nice Day, and a Happy Sieg Heil MAGA to you!
Have I now been banned, under orders of The State?
et tu, Mar a Lago
I am just waiting for the EO to drop mandating the official renaming of “The Southern White House’.
Gulf of ???????
I would be happy with the Gulf of AmericaS because that is exactly what it is. “America” includes north, central and south….. Just a tiny “S” makes the entire problem go away. Now if it were only as easy to resolve the problems with the president/king/dictator/whatever…..
Google is a private company and can do what it wants. If Mexico doesn’t like it, they can leave.
Call it the "Gulf of Moronica"
For inspiration, check out the Three Stooges episode #44 (1940), “You Nazty Spy”.
“Moronica for Morons!”
“MAGA!”
Made-Up Name
“…the AP refused to update its influential Stylebook to refer to the Gulf of Mexico by its newly dictated and entirely made up name, the “Gulf of America.”
The Gulf of Mexico is an entirely made-up name as well. Do you think these geographical names occur naturally as part of the tectonic evolution of the earth or something?
Re:
Do you think everyone calls every location a completely different name all the time or maybe names are used that are commonly used and agreed on. Trump just arbitrarily decided to start calling a body of water by a new name that he has no authority to rename nor had anyone else been calling it by that name.
But sure, defend newspeak as if it’s not weird or authoritarian. Simp for that boot.