Trader Joe’s To Pay Legal Fees To Employee Union Over Its Bullshit Trademark Lawsuit
from the oops dept
It’s been nearly a year, but I won’t pretend that the outcome of this isn’t quite satisfying. Last summer, grocerer Trader Joe’s filed an absolute bullshit lawsuit against the union for its own employees claiming that the name of and merchandise sold by the union represented trademark infringement and would cause confusion with the public as to the source of those goods. The court dismissed that suit in fairly spectacular fashion, taking the company to task for those claims, given how clear the website and merch are that all of this is coming from the union and not the company itself. The ruling made some fairly clear speculation that the company was doing this instead just to make trouble for a union it’s trying to hassle, which is absolutely what it is doing. While the company decided to appeal the ruling, keeping all of its bad actions in the news for even longer, the original ruling judge has now also ordered the company to pay legal fees to the union, given the nature of the company’s lawsuit.
Trader Joe’s must pay more than $100,000 in attorneys’ fees for bringing an “exceptionally weak” trademark lawsuit against its employee union, a California federal judge has determined.
U.S. District Judge Hernan Vera said on Tuesday, opens new tab that Trader Joe’s case was meritless and that “the obvious motivation behind the suit” was to influence the grocery store chain’s fight with Trader Joe’s United over its drive to unionize Trader Joe’s employees.
“Recognizing the extensive and ongoing legal battles over the Union’s organizing efforts at multiple stores, Trader Joe’s claim that it was genuinely concerned about the dilution of its brand resulting from these trivial campaign mugs and buttons cannot be taken seriously,” Vera said.
Chef’s kiss, honestly. Nobody with a couple of braincells to rub together could seriously believe that the motivation behind this legal action was anything other than being a nuisance for the union as part of a larger effort to make its life as difficult as possible. All the other claims over trademark infringement are purely manufactured as part of that motivation. With that in mind, forcing the company to pay the legal fees the union racked up defending itself from this nonsense is absolutely appropriate.
Vera said on Tuesday that the weakness and impropriety of Trader Joe’s case justified ordering the company to pay the union’s attorneys’ fees.
“Employers should be discouraged from bringing meritless claims against unions they are challenging at the ballot box,” Vera said.
As I’ve said before, the bad PR associated with all of this should have been enough to motivate Trader Joe’s to course correct. Instead, it seems like even more pressure on the company from the public and courts is required.
Filed Under: free speech, legal fees, trademark, union, union busting
Companies: trader joe's
Comments on “Trader Joe’s To Pay Legal Fees To Employee Union Over Its Bullshit Trademark Lawsuit”
Damn straight that people bringing meritless and ridiculous lawsuits should have to pay for them. Too bad it isn’t more common.
I'm still boycotting TJ
Score one, yeah. But I’m still boycotting TJs because in the larger picture they are trying to prevent union organizing.
Also they are party to the crummy lawsuit against the NRLB by Tesla, Amazon, and Starbucks… Saying the NRLB is all judicial acting as executives. WTF?
But besides all that, TJ cancelled all my favorite items. They are worse than Google in the size of their dead product graveyard. So, Harrumph!