FCC Finally Updates America’s Pathetic Definition Of ‘Broadband’ To 100 Mbps

from the better-late-than-never dept

For decades, the FCC has maintained an arguably pathetic definition of “broadband,” allowing the telecom industry to under-deliver substandard access. After some industry lobbying to ensure it wasn’t too stringent, the agency is finally getting around to an update, and has announced that they’ll soon classify “broadband” as anything faster than 100 Mbps downstream, 20 Mbps upstream.

According to FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel, the agency’s ultimate goal is to define broadband as 1 Gbps down, 500 Mbps up, though that part is largely aspirational:

“This fix is overdue. It aligns us with pandemic legislation like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the work of our colleagues at other agencies. It also helps us better identify the extent to which low-income neighborhoods and rural communities are underserved. And because doing big things is in our DNA, we also adopt a long-term goal of 1 Gigabit down and 500 Megabits up.”

As an aside, as somebody who has covered this agency professionally for more than twenty years, “doing big things” is most assuredly not in the FCC’s DNA.

Broadband was originally defined as any 200 kbps connection, a pathetic metric from the very start. In 2010, that pathetic definition was changed to a slightly less pathetic definition: 4 Mbps downstream, 1 Mbps upstream. In 2015, it was changed again to a slightly more reasonable but still pathetic 25 Mbps downstream, 3 Mbps upstream, where it stayed for almost a decade.

For that entire decade everybody from consumer groups to the GAO told the FCC that the sluggish 25/3 definition didn’t reflect modern standards, and let the telecom industry get away with providing substandard service. The Trump FCC’s response: to propose lowering the definition even further.

Even the FCC’s new 100 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up threshold was watered down by cable and wireless lobbyists, who knew they’d struggle providing consistent 100 Mbps upstream. And it’s still relatively tepid given some municipal broadband networks have been offering 10 Gbps connections since 2015. And it came long after other agencies (like the NTIA) had adopted the standard for federal subsidies.

So yes, hooray that the FCC has decided twenty years fucking late to raise the bar somewhere around ankle height for America’s giant telecoms to try and avoid tripping over. This at least puts a little more pressure on ISPs that are still overcharging consumers for 2003-era Digital Subscriber Line (DSL).

But the agency’s apathy up until this point did untold damage in terms of letting telecom giants like Comcast and AT&T obscure the competitive impact of mindless consolidation and regional monopolization. And the agency “with big things in its DNA” still doesn’t collect and share broadband pricing data, lest the press, public, and lawmakers realize the full scope of that competition problem.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC Finally Updates America’s Pathetic Definition Of ‘Broadband’ To 100 Mbps”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
41 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

All that’s wasted on rural populations though. They want to be backwards and stupid. They want their kids and backwards and stupid and hungry. That way, they can make sure their communities remain backwards and stupid long after their deaths.

All faster broadband will do is let them spread and reinforce their stupidity faster. Might as well be taking my tax money to roll out fiber for the Taliban’s Afghanistan. The functional difference between rural America and the Taliban is a matter of external constraints placed on the former.

I do IT work for a healthcare organization in a rural state. Many of our clients absolutely rely on telehealth for their physical and mental well being. And most of our clients are good people who deserve better. But keep making asinine assumpti says:

Re: Re:

I do IT work for a healthcare organization in a rural state. Many of our clients absolutely rely on telehealth for their physical and mental wellbeing. And most of our clients are good people who deserve better.

But keep making asinine assumptions about people you don’t know, you ignorant douchebag.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

If we were talking about the civil rights era, and they were supporting the overt reactionary response of the time, would you be leaping to their defense as such? Or is it just because they’ve set their sights on the queers these days that you’re willing to give them a pass?

ECA (profile) says:

Re: This will have

A 5+ year time frame and at the end, extend another 5, Before ENOUGH persons get bothered to compare the USA with INDIA/PAKISTAN/Israel/Afghanistan and other places.
(AGAIN)
THEN, someplace around 15 years, the Gov. will figure out that THEY built the backbone YEARS ago, and SHOULD do the work at 10 times the current wage prices.
Which STILL wont do anything for the ‘Last Mile’, or the Rural areas.
yada yada yada..

Whoever says:

Competition/no competition

I recently moved from somewhere that Comcast/Xfinity has an effective monopoly to somewhere that has a choice of 3 broadband (even under the new definition) services.

From Comcast, I got about 300 down, but only 5 (yes, 5!) up. In the new location, I have 1Gb symmetrical, with an even faster option. It’s cheaper than the 300/5 from Comcast.

Nick-B says:

For years, the DSL at my house had been a pair of phone lines at 40 down, 6 up each (total: 80 down, 12 up). A few months ago, each line “mysteriously” increased to 53.xxx down, and 7.xxx up (total 106.xxx down and 15.xxx up). Just in time for this new update to broadband internet, my ISP snuck in under the wire for the down pipe.

There was no other reason to increase the down speed, so I suspect it was to be able to boast that it is broadband. If that is the case, though, I expect my upload will also sneak up a few mbps within the coming months.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

but limited to 5Gb/month for 99$, right?

I think the ISPs have mostly backed off from the ridiculously low limits on wired connections, but the FCC should definitely be making “unlimited” a requirement. An unlimited 100 Mbit/s connection allows about 30 terabytes per month, and I’d prefer it to a faster connection with a lower limit.

And then there are the wireless carriers, who need to be reined in by the FCC probably more than the wired ones.

Anonymous Coward says:

Anything less than 1Gbps up AND down at $20USD a month without caps should not be considered broadband, and that’s by standards a decade ago. Asian countries have had these standards since then. By the time anything happens, if it does at all, the world leaders will be at 10Gbps for the same price.

US Telecoms have stolen nearly $1 trillion from taxpayers and 30 years later there’s nothing to show for it. Read the book “The Book of Broken Promises: $400 Billion Broadband Scandal & Free the Net” which was written nearly a decade ago.

Every American should have had low cost fiber to the premises by now. Saying that’s not feasible for any reason completely ignores the massive corruption and theft that’s taken place under your nose.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...