Axon/Taser Once Again Caught Threatening A Government Agency For Not Giving It What It Wants
from the petty-and-vindictive dept
Axon, most famous for producing Tasers, is again making the sort of headlines it really shouldn’t make.
Everyone knows Taser. The company produces the most-used “less lethal” weapons cops deploy. “Less” is the key word here. It’s basically a cattle prod for humans but one that’s routinely deployed with less care than a cattle prod, even if its manufacturer instructs cops to limit the number of uses per minute or cautions against over-use of drive stun mode. People with heart conditions shouldn’t be tased, but no one’s consulting medical files before affecting arrests. People who’ve just doused themselves with gasoline definitely shouldn’t be tased, but you go to war with the army you have.
Axon is now more interested in selling body cams to cops. It will still sell you all the Tasers you want, but the real money is in the data storage and access market. It’s the inkjet printer plan, but for cops. The body cams are the loss leaders. Record all you want, but storing and accessing recordings will cost you, much in the same way your $29.99 printer won’t function until you buy a $70 3-color ink refill.
This shift in focus has allowed Axon to make more money while distancing itself from Tasers and the damage done — something it definitely needed to do as medical association after medical association refused to recognize “excited delirium” as an actual health condition.
For some reason, Axon seems to have a problem with accepting rejection, despite being the most-recognized name in the lucrative body cam field. A little more than four years ago, Axon generated negative headlines for refusing to gracefully accept the termination of a contract. The Fontana, California police department discontinued its use of Axon body cameras, making its $4,000/year contract with Axon’s Evidence.com completely useless.
Axon refused to take the L. It responded to the Fontana PD’s suggestion it would not continue to pay the bill for services it wasn’t using with this:
The only cancellation term is Termination for Non-Appropriations or lack of funding. There is a negative effect, however, as it can affect the credit rating of the City. Since we are looking at about nine months it would probably make more sense to ride out the rest of the contract…
In other words, Axon suggested it would report each month of non-payment to credit agencies, dragging down the city’s credit rating simply because it didn’t want to pay for something it wasn’t using.
While some might defend Axon by saying “the city signed a contract!,” that argument doesn’t hold up. The contract (contractually!) gave the city this option: “termination for convenience.” That clause meant the city could cancel the contract for exactly the reasons stated: it no longer required Axon’s storage and access services because it was no longer using the company’s body cameras.
Axon is doing this shit again, albeit for much different reasons. As Sam Kmack reports for AZCentral, Axon is again behaving in an extremely petty fashion because it didn’t get what it wanted.
Scottsdale’s city attorney confirmed in a sharply worded letter that an Axon employee had contacted a city planning commissioner’s boss about the official’s opposition to a controversial project.
“This type of action tends to raise public concern about the integrity of the city’s public hearing process,” City Attorney Sherry Scott wrote in a letter dated Friday. “It can also have a chilling effect on … public officials’ willingness to serve in their volunteer capacity.”
Here’s the thing about city and town commissioners. Being a commissioner isn’t their only job. Most commissioner positions don’t pay enough to be anyone’s only job. On top of that, their work for the locales they represent doesn’t consume 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year.
So, when Axon pitched the city of Scottsdale a plan to build 2,000 apartment units near its proposed headquarters, it assumed the city would choose to ignore the fact that the location it had chosen wasn’t actually zoned for apartment construction.
Axon reps attended a city meeting in January, hoping to convince commissioners that rezoning the area to give Axon what it wanted would be a win for all Scottsdale residents. The commissioners disagreed, with Planning Commissioner Christian Serena being the most vocal in his objections.
Last month, Serena informed the city attorney a member of “Axon’s leadership” had contacted his day job, allegedly telling his employer (Merrill Lynch), presumably insinuating that his day job presented some form of conflict of interest since Merrill Lynch has also made overtures to Axon in an attempt to secure its (still-undefined) business.
Scott confirmed in the letter, addressed to Axon’s lawyer, an Axon employee did contact Serena’s employer, Merrill Lynch.
“It is apparent to me that an Axon employee did contact Commissioner Serena’s employer to discuss dissatisfaction with Commissioner Serena’s public hearing comments,” Scott wrote.
This “dissatisfaction” was explained more explicitly in Axon CEO Rick Smith’s response to the city attorney’s letter.
“Your March 1st letter was in the hands of multiple media outlets within hours of receipt. Up to this time, we limited our correspondence with media out of respect for the integrity of the process,” Smith’s letter read. “Unfortunately, it appears some within the City are more focused on prioritizing political theater.”
Smith’s letter contends Serena may have had a conflict of interest in deciding on Axon’s project because “Merrill Lynch (and its parent company) Bank of America have been unsuccessful in winning Axon’s business” despite approaching the company on “several occasions.”
Whew. That’s not even a denial. That’s pretty much an admission someone pretty far up the org chart tried to convince the commissioner’s employer that Serena was supposedly rejecting Axon’s request for re-zoning solely because Merrill Lynch’s courtship of Axon had been unsuccessful.
Even if this were true (and there’s not a whole lot of reason to believe it is), the proper way to handle this would be to take it up with the city’s commissioners, rather than approach a commissioner’s day job and try to get them reprimanded, if not fired, simply because Axon failed to convince a city government to alter the regulatory landscape to indulge one company’s wishes.
It’s not a good look, especially for a company that relies almost solely on contracts with government agencies to make ends meet. And it’s definitely not a good look for a company that’s done this sort of thing before. Sure, this may seem like two unrelated instances, but if it’s been caught doing this twice, there’s a good chance it’s gone a bit thuggish in the past, but has managed to escape being called out publicly.
Filed Under: arizona, christian serena, scottsdale, zoning
Companies: axon, merrill lynch, taser
Comments on “Axon/Taser Once Again Caught Threatening A Government Agency For Not Giving It What It Wants”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
These are some of the brave law enforcement officers who’ve died in 2024. Say their names, anarcho-communist!
Deputy Sheriff Justin Smith
Stone County Sheriff’s Office, AR
EOW: Tuesday, January 2, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Eric Anthony Minix
Coweta County Sheriff’s Office, GA
EOW: Thursday, January 4, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Jeremy Malone
George County Sheriff’s Office, MS
EOW: Thursday, January 4, 2024
Lieutenant David J. McShane
New York State Environmental Conservation Police, NY
EOW: Monday, January 22, 2024
Trooper Joel Popp
Michigan State Police, MI
EOW: Wednesday, January 24, 2024
Sergeant Michael “Zini” Kurinzi
Elizabeth Police Department, NJ
EOW: Saturday, January 27, 2024
Trooper Jimmy Cenescar
Georgia State Patrol, GA
EOW: Sunday, January 28, 2024
Trooper Zachary Fink
Florida Highway Patrol, FL
EOW: Friday, February 2, 2024
Chief Deputy Sheriff Ken Prorok
Moody County Sheriff’s Office, SD
EOW: Friday, February 2, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Timothy Tavarus Rivers
Crawford County Sheriff’s Office, GA
EOW: Tuesday, February 6, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Christopher Johnson
Harnett County Sheriff’s Office, NC
EOW: Tuesday, February 6, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Greg McCowan
Blount County Sheriff’s Office, TN
EOW: Thursday, February 8, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Rondald Bates
Harris County Sheriff’s Office, TX
EOW: Saturday, February 10, 2024
Patrol Officer Jonah Hernandez
Las Cruces Police Department, NM
EOW: Sunday, February 11, 2024
Sergeant Nevada Krinkee
Sheridan Police Department, WY
EOW: Tuesday, February 13, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Robert John Leonard
Meigs County Sheriff’s Office, TN
EOW: Wednesday, February 14, 2024
Police Officer Paul Elmstrand
Burnsville Police Department, MN
EOW: Sunday, February 18, 2024
Police Officer Matthew Henke Ruge
Burnsville Police Department, MN
EOW: Sunday, February 18, 2024
Trooper First Class Chase Winston Redner
Georgia State Patrol, GA
EOW: Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Deputy Sheriff Charles Rivette
Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, TX
EOW: Wednesday, February 21, 2024
Police Officer Wisbens Antoine
Knoxville Police Department, TN
EOW: Sunday, February 25, 2024
Officer Cody Allen
Independence Police Department, MO
EOW: Thursday, February 29, 2024
Trooper Christopher M. Gadd
Washington State Patrol, WA
EOW: Saturday, March 2, 2024
Re:
Good for them.
Do you know all the names of innocent kids cops let die at Uvalde?
Re: Re:
I, yet a third Anonymous Coward, do not know those names you ask about.
However, I do know where to find them. … and I’m not afraid to bring them out.
As for the GP’s list of fallen officers? Hee hee! Haw! I looked up one as representative:
Lieutenant David J McShane … died of cancer.
I only looked up the one, but y’know? Representative of the list? We really need a better quality of troll around here.
Re: Re: Re:
I randomly picked then looked up Wisbens Antoinne, died after collapsing while training, again, something that could hab happened whatever his job. Maybe they should research before trying to make martyrs or just list numbers with no further details like the actual cops do when trying to make it seem like their pro-murder policies are justified.
Re: Re: Re:
Lieutenant David J. McShane’s cancer may have been related to asbestosis since he developed it after taking part in the search and recovery efforts at the World Trade Center site in 2001. Not the first AC, just putting the fact out there.
Re: Re: Re:2
First responder. The people that republicans had to be shamed into doing even the bare minimum for.
Re: Re: Re:
You’re a ghoul.
Re:
Just write a check, maybe 10k, they had limited value.
Re:
Talk about a dichotomy, what a putz.
Re: Re: In fairness
Anarcho-communism is a well-established and coherent ideology. It holds that any social order built on hierarchical social dynamics is unjust, including both centralized states and capitalist businesses, and advocates for their replacement with egalitarian, typically decentralized, alternatives (anarchism), and that the ideal economic order is one in which people do what they can to keep society and infrastructure functioning, and get what they need to live fulfilling lives from their community in exchange (communism). No contradiction between those two things.
Re: Re: Re:
To be fair, I was half done writing a response to you before I realized the phrase at question was “Anarcho-communism” and not “Anarcho-capitalism”.
The only time I ever encounter the Anarcho prefix are the ones who don’t understand the conflict of Anarcho-capitalism, and no casual online mention of communism bothers to distinguish between the various governmental structures (up to and including no formal Government at all) that could support communism.
Re:
How many were in car accidents, not wearing seatbelts?
Re: Damn them donuts
It’s a shame law enforcement suffers from obesity, diabetes, and other ailments due to donut ingestion, just a damn shame.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
While you’re loathsome, I’m glad you and your fellow travelers are belching up your anti-police hate speech.
Shows this site’s readership for what it mostly is.
Re: Re: Re:
If you get ” I hate cops” out of “it’s bad for a cop to rape and kill a child” the problem is you.
Re: Re: Re:
[projects facts contrary to extensive evidence]
Re: Re: Re:
While you’re loathsome, I’m glad you and your fellow travelers are belching up your anti-citizen hate speech.
Shows you and your ilk for what you mostly are.
Re: Re: Re:
FYI, Sarah Everard is cursing you from her grave.
Re: Re:
Don’t forget incompetent driving.
Re:
You’re insinuating that Axon killed these law enforcement officers? That’s a hell of a take.
Re: Re:
Absolutely correct.
We already know Axon specializes in devices that kill civilians.
Y’know? Were I a part-time (or volunteer) Scottsdale employee, I would be booting about a persona non grata memorandum about Axon.
They’ve shown they’re willing to attack people outside the scope of their office. They won’t be constrained to the one attack.
Code enforcement, water quality testing, traffic management, I’d make sure that everyone got the word. There are indeed consequences for pissing off the bureaucracy.
Axon apartments? What the actual fuck?
Now, zoning in North America is pretty fucked up, but flipping something just for a really creepy and weird side venture of Axon? Hard pass.
Axon/Taser: Not Even Once
Threatening a city for cancelling a contract due to not needing it, trying to get a city council member fired from their other job after they refused the company’s request to rezone an area… more and more it’s sounding like only a fool would have anything to do with that company at all.
I have heard my co-workers speak of other companies in Arizona that built housing to accommodate large numbers of employees brought in through work visa programs. Maybe that’s what Axon wanted to do as well.
They both need to lose. Fuck Axon and fuck NIMBYs.
Re:
Especially fuck NIMBYs. Maybe they’ll get one (a non-white person) in their backyard.