Republicans Try To Block Very Basic Efforts To Prevent Racial Discrimination In Broadband Deployment

from the this-is-why-we-can't-have-nice-things dept

Back in December I wrote a feature for The Verge exploring the FCC’s long overdue effort to stop race and class discrimination in broadband deployment. For decades, big telecoms have not only refused to evenly upgrade broadband in low income and poor areas (despite billions in subsidies for this exact purpose), they’ve charged poor and minority neighborhoods significantly more money.

So last year the FCC announced they’d be crafting new rules that attempt to put an end to it. While the rules are a welcome and belated admission by the government that this discrimination actually exists, they don’t really do anything about past instances of discrimination. Nor is it particularly clear that the generally feckless FCC will do a good (or transparent) job actually enforcing them.

Despite the fact that the rules aren’t particularly robust, Republicans have, as usual, rushed to the defense of the broadband industry in a bid to eliminate them. 65 US House Republications submitted a resolution of disapproval claiming, falsely, that the Biden administration was using the pretense of “equity” to “expand the federal government’s control of all Internet services and infrastructure”:

“Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) alleged that the ‘FCC’s so-called ‘digital discrimination’ rule hands bureaucrats unmitigated regulatory authority that will undoubtedly impede innovation, burden consumers, and generate censorship concerns,” and that it is an “unconstitutional power grab.'”

This is the perpetual doom cycle U.S. telecom policy has inhabited for 30 odd years.

Democrats weakly propose long overdue but meekly enforced rules to address a problem they’ve ignored for the better part of thirty years. Republicans pop up to proclaim these bare-minimum efforts are somehow a “radical socialist takeover of the internet” (or some variant), which “both sides” news outlets parrot without much in the way of skepticism, giving the GOP unearned credibility on policy.

It doesn’t matter whether it’s broadband privacy, net neutrality, racial discrimination, or even very basic efforts to stop your cable company from ripping you off with bullshit fees. The pretense is always that the government doing the absolute bare minimum is, in reality, a “radical government running amok.”

Lost in press coverage is the fact that Republicans (and some key Democrats) have always operated in corrupt policy lockstep with giant regional monopolies, working tirelessly to help them fatten revenues by waging an all out war on both meaningful competition and competent regulatory oversight. While throwing billions of dollars at said companies in exchange for half-deployed broadband networks and job creation promises that never materialize. You can very obviously see the result.

Unlike when the GOP killed broadband privacy rules in 2017, they can’t scuttle these rules using the Congressional Review Act since they don’t hold the Senate. So they’ll work with telecom giants AT&T, Comcast, and Charter to bog the implementation of the rules down in the courts, awaiting a looming Supreme Court decision that will soon undermine most independent regulatory authority.

All the while, minority and poor neighborhoods stuck under expensive, shitty monopolized broadband access continue to struggle to gain access to an increasingly essential utility. I don’t see a way out of this perpetual cycle of policy dysfunction without a full frontal assault on corruption, and it’s very clear we’ll be waiting indefinitely for anything of the sort.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Republicans Try To Block Very Basic Efforts To Prevent Racial Discrimination In Broadband Deployment”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
28 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

'How dare you try to help minorities?!'

Democrats put forth barely impactful rule trying to do something about discrimination against minorities when it comes to broadband access and prices and republicans scramble to object… it’s a good thing this is certainly just a case of blatant corruption by corporate bootlickers doing their damnedest to protect the ones who own them otherwise that sure would seem like one hell of a racist move.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

There's no "racial discrimination in broadband deployment"

It’s just less profitable to serve some poor neighborhoods. Seriously, the ISP doesn’t give a crap what color you are, only if you can pay.

You are, ironically, being super racist in trying to put this in racial terms.

The solution is less government regulation and market interference, LESS (or no) subsidies, which caused the duopolies that led to the market failure in the first place. If there was an actual competitive market someone someone would want to serve the poor neighborhoods.

But you are an asshat for pretending it’s about race.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: 'Here's ten apples for YOUR $10, and here's one half-eaten apple for YOUR $10...'

Now now, how would they know otherwise, it’s not like the third link in the article went to another article all about how neighborhoods that tended to have more minorities were getting vastly worse service for the same prices that others were being charged.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

Re: Re: Re:

Yes, it’s almost as if woke journalists like to manufacture woke narratives.

It’s just income. Also maybe some poor urban neighborhoods the housing is older so they just haven’t laid new cable in a long time.

But seriously, the faceless corporate rent seeker with the gov mandated duopoly doesn’t care what color people are. That’s just super dumb. Also woke race baiting nonsense.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

Re: Re:

Some basic reading would show them doing things like charging higher rates in minority areas.

…”poor”. You just mean “poor” neighborhoods. And it’s for basically the same reasons poor people are charged higher interest rates….they default at higher rates, making them a riskier investment.

The old joke is it’s expensive to be poor. Not such a joke actually, just a truism.

But by making it about race, you’re a race baiting asshat.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Many of the poor are that way even tho they work full time, the employers simply do not pay what it takes to live in the local area. Many poor are white, I recall reading that more white folk are on welfare and snap than members of other ethnicity. Business does seem to take advantage of the poor, you can deny it but that changes nothing.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Matt,

You clearly are not knowledgeable in this area of study.

“It’s just less profitable to serve some poor neighborhoods.”

Yeah, so why not let them build their own?

“The solution is less government regulation and market interference, LESS (or no) subsidies, which caused the duopolies that led to the market failure in the first place.”

Shame your republican friends disagree with you as every time the gop is in power there is bigger government, more market interference, more business subsidy and basic chaos .. seems to be their goal in life.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

Re: Re:

Yeah, so why not let them build their own?

who, the residents of the poor neighborhoods?

Shame your republican friends disagree with you as every time the gop is in power there is bigger government, more market interference, more business subsidy and basic chaos

That is just never the case, one thing republicans are always fighting for is deregulation, which is exactly what’s needed here.

“You clearly are not knowledgeable in this area of study.” Right back at ya

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Yeah, so why not let them build their own?
who, the residents of the poor neighborhoods?

In case you rolled a 1 on “Spot Obvious”, this is a reference to the fact that the telecom monopolies have consistently opposed community/government funded broadband efforts.

So yeah, the residents of the poor neighborhoods, via their elected representative in city/county government.

one thing republicans are always fighting for is deregulation

… except when it comes to things like community broadband. There are other examples where republicans are fighting for more regulation and governmental control, but they are less apropos to this discussion.

“You clearly are not knowledgeable in this area of study.” Right back at ya.

So… how about you providing a link to a study showing how the broadband monopolies are in fact on white horses, failing to provide to poor neighborhoods specifically for economic reasons? Ah, wait… you never provide proof, do you?

Back in the olden days, there was this thing called the Rural Electrification Act which the incumbent telcos would have an absolute shit-fit about, were an equivalent broadband act enacted today.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

Re: Re: Re:2

telecom monopolies have consistently opposed community/government funded broadband efforts.

I mean of course they do, but they also oppose deregulation that would just open up the market. There are very very few things that better done by government (even small local government) than a competitive market and telecom definitely isn’t one of them.

… except when it comes to things like community broadband.

Not at a national level. Community broadband (which no, isn’t a great idea, mostly in that it’s worse than real competition) basically has no interaction with the federal government. At the state/local things get a lot more complicated and don’t break down along right/left lines so cleanly, but that’s also not what we’re talking about here.

So… how about you providing a link to a study showing how the broadband monopolies are in fact on white horses, failing to provide to poor neighborhoods specifically for economic reasons?

I…don’t…have to? The only data has been stongly broken down along income lines. Then, because there’s a strong correlation with race, if you’re a race baiter wokie, you get to claim “they’re racist!” But…why? what possible motivation could they have for discriminating based on race? The answer is that they don’t. They’re just following the money.

Go ahead, show me a RICH, but mostly black neighborhood that has bad broadband for some reason.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Strawb (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

There are very very few things that better done by government (even small local government) than a competitive market and telecom definitely isn’t one of them.

There isn’t a competitive market because the telecoms hack up territories amongst themselves. These ISPs have had literally decades to improve things, and there’s no evidence that they’re even moving in the right direction.

Having the FCC make them do what they’re supposed to given the billions of dollars they’ve received from the government, at this point, has a better chance of actually doing something.

Community broadband (which no, isn’t a great idea, mostly in that it’s worse than real competition)

And since there’s no real competition, pretty much any kind of community broadband is likely to be better.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Colorblind

The FCC is using a racist term in their rulemaking called “disparate impact”, whereby they try to force equal outcomes based on the color of peoples’ skin. If regulators can find telecom companies considering race in their deployment decisions, then that’s a problem worth solving. But they haven’t been able to do that. Instead, the FCC is attempting to force telecoms to consider race, which is the very definition of racism. Don’t provide advantages or disadvantages based on anyone’s color.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...