Microsoft Lays Off Nearly 2,000, Including A Bunch From Activision Blizzard Studios
from the cool-cool dept
And here we go. We have spent the past couple of years discussing Microsoft’s acquisition, and all the trials and tribulations that led to it, of Activision Blizzard. This deal, that faced mostly flaccid opposition from several national regulatory bodies throughout the world, cost Microsoft $69 billion, with a “b”, to consummate. And that’s just the sale price. That figure does not include all the money worldwide Microsoft spent to shadowbox all those regulators and the like. We’re talking serious dollars here, in other words.
So how are things going now that the deal has gone through? Well, Microsoft is canceling at least one Blizzard game that was in development while laying off nearly 2,000 workers specifically in its video gaming division. I’m going to focus on the workers, since I care much more about them than some game that was early on in its development.
Spencer said Microsoft was laying off 1,900 people starting today, with workers continuing to receive notifications in the coming days. The layoffs affect 8.64 percent of Microsoft’s 22,000-employee gaming division.
Another internal memo, written by Matt Booty, Microsoft’s game content and studios president, and seen by The Verge, said the layoffs are hitting “multiple” Blizzard teams, “including development teams, shared service organizations and corporate functions.” In January 2022, after plans for the merger were first announced, Bobby Kotick, then-CEO of Activision Blizzard, reportedly told employees at a meeting that Microsoft was “committed to trying to retain as many of our people as possible.”
Were these layoffs, particularly those targeting the newly acquired studios, always the plan? We obviously don’t know that currently. And, for what it’s worth, the video game industry in general is going through all kinds of layoffs across all kinds of studios and publishers. Still, it sends one hell of a message to Microsoft’s staff that it’s willing to spend tens and tens of billions of dollars on studios just to then turn around and lay off nearly a tenth of its workforce.
And when it comes to whether any part of this had always been part of the plan, Booty’s memo in particular is somewhat illuminating.
Booty’s memo said the job cuts announced today “reflect a focus on products and strategies that hold the most promise for Blizzard’s future growth, as well as identified areas of overlap across Blizzard and Microsoft Gaming.”
He claimed that layoffs would “enable Blizzard and Xbox to deliver ambitious games… on more platforms and in more places than ever before,” as well as “sustainable growth.”
I’ll leave that last bit of corporate pablum alone, as I think it mostly speaks for itself as a useless set of executive-speak. But I am interested in the bit where Microsoft had identified “areas of overlap.” Identified when, would be my question. Because I refuse to believe that in an acquisition as large and visible as this one, that Microsoft somehow didn’t tear into Activision Blizzard’s books when it came to workforce, what that workforce was doing, and so on. So the best answer I can come up with for Microsoft as to whether these layoffs were planned ahead of the deal being finalized is something like: “If it wasn’t, it should have been.”
But overall, and here I’ll borrow a phrase from our own Karl Bode, it sure seems like those “merger synergies” are really paying off!
Filed Under: competition, consolidation, jobs, layoffs, video games
Companies: activision blizzard, microsoft


Comments on “Microsoft Lays Off Nearly 2,000, Including A Bunch From Activision Blizzard Studios”
Microsoft also just announced they’re supporting KOSA. Looks like apart from buying Activision-Blizzard, they also inherited their habit of throwing people under the buses.
Microsoft is a great place to work, until you don’t.
Learn to code.
22,000 employees just in gaming? Just how big has microsoft become?
Re:
I’m guessing they’re counting the newly incorporated employees from ActiBlizz.
Re: Re:
*DeactiBlitz
Re:
Lets throw in more numbers for context!
Activision Blizzard had something like 11,000 employees at the time of acquisition, so before it acquired Activision, Microsoft’s 39 other studios combined were almost as big as Activision Blizzard.
Microsoft Gaming is now twice the size of Activision Blizzard pre-acquision.
Microsoft as a whole employs ~220,000. So Microsoft Gaming is ~1/11th of Microsoft, or in other words, Microsoft is as big as 22 Activision Blizzards. This also Makes Microsoft the 86th largest employer in the world by employee count.
But by revenue, Microsoft is ranked 23rd. Thats where its size really plays out.
Re: Re:
Don’t forget that Microsoft Gaming includes Xbox.
How else are you going to earn money by spending 69 Billion (with a capital “B”) dollars?
Dude, what is up with this spam that’s getting through the filters? They aren’t even trying to hide it.
quick google search on "microsoft profits" ...
Microsoft gross profit for the quarter ending September 30, 2023 was $40.215B, a 15.99% increase year-over-year.
Microsoft gross profit for the twelve months ending September 30, 2023 was $151.597B, a 9.36% increase year-over-year.
Microsoft annual gross profit for 2023 was $146.052B, a 7.69% increase from 2022.
Microsoft annual gross profit for 2022 was $135.62B, a 17.06% increase from 2021.
… clearly that’s not enough to retain employees.
Re:
Microsoft only cares about retaining shareholders.
Re: Re:
While chasing away those generating the profits that line their pockets.
Re:
What company in the world keeps thousands in duplicate positions and survives. Most of these are somewhat managerial positions. Department heads, project heads, and the like.
Historically companies that hang on to old management post merger tend to have the most problems.
Not surprising after a merger. Companies can be full of crap about this sort of process, but essentially when a merger happens, there’s going to be a lot of duplicate positions and cancelled projects. I’ve been through the process a few times and it sucks if you’re not being retained, but “company lays off people after a merger” is about as surprising as “blocked drain floods after thunderstorm”.