Americans Received 55 Billion Robocalls In 2023, A 9% Jump From 2022

from the please-take-this,-we-weren't-using-it dept

It’s extremely weird that we’ve somehow normalized the fact that scammers, scumbags, debt collectors, and marketers have made the U.S.’ primary voice communication platform largely unusable.

There is some good news: according to data from the YouMail Robocall Index, U.S. consumers received just under 3.8 billion robocalls during the month of December, a 16.3% decrease from the month before.

The bad news: that November to December decrease usually happens (predatory scumbags take breaks over the holidays like everybody else) and may not be fully representative of a meaningful trend. The company also found that Americans received more than 55 billion robocalls in 2023, a 9% increase from 2022.

There was a 38 percent drop in scam calls, thanks (in part) to efforts at the FCC. The agency has, belatedly, been trying to force long-apathetic wireless carriers into implementing better SHAKEN/STIR anti-number-spoofing tech, and it seems to be helping. Though popping the bubbly is premature given we’re still talking about 8.1 billion scam calls made every year to U.S. consumers alone:

“There was a 38% reduction in scam calls, down to just over 8.1 billion scam calls for the year. This stems from a combination of much less call spoofing due to Stir/Shaken being rolled out almost universally, as well as scammers getting much more targeted in their calling campaigns. Secondly, this reduction in scam calls led to likely unwanted calls declining from 49% of all calls to 43% of all robocalls, with over 1.3 billion fewer likely unwanted calls for the year.”

One major problem, as we’ve discussed previously, is that focusing exclusively on “scam” calls doesn’t paint an accurate picture of the problem. Groups like the National Consumer Law Center have pointed out for years that legitimate corporations and debt collectors are among the biggest contributors to robocall annoyance, and use many of the same tactics as outright scammers.

The National Consumer Law Center has been testifying before Congress for years that our robocall problem persists for several key reasons:

  • Lobbying by a coalition of industries has routinely led to Supreme Court rulings that have curtailed the FCC’s authority to pursue “scammers” and legitimate companies alike.
  • Lobbying by those same mainstream industries has resulted in a paradigm where the discourse fixates on “scammers,” when “legitimate” corporations are routinely the biggest culprits, often using the same exact tactics as scammers to do things like harass heavily-indebted people they know can’t pay, or upsell consumers to services they’ve already said they don’t want (telecom loves this one).
  • The FCC has long lacked the backbone to stand up to telcos and wireless providers that for 20+ years turned a blind eye on robocalling and other scams because they profited from the traffic running over their networks (and in many cases still do).
  • The current system allows the FCC to fine robocallers, but doesn’t give the FCC the authority to actually collect those fines. That falls to the DOJ, which often doesn’t bother. The FCC has repeatedly asked for the authority to collect fines itself, but a corrupt Congress ignores the request, thanks to a prevailing “wisdom,” seeded by industry, that competent regulatory oversight is somehow bad.

We could truly put the robocall problem to bed if we addressed the fact that major corporations and corporate-friendly, rightward-lurching courts have turned our robocall regulatory enforcement into swiss cheese. But that’s not a bet I’d be willing to make anytime soon.

The notable increase comes despite an endless parade of FCC proclamations that they’re finally taking the problem more seriously. Every so often the agency insists it’s taken historic steps toward fixing the problem, yet the problem continues to grow.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Americans Received 55 Billion Robocalls In 2023, A 9% Jump From 2022”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
27 Comments
David says:

I think a problem is that when a Russian robocaller tries to persuade the recipient to vote for Trump by ticking off a number of outrageous bullshit almost-sounds-like-facts, this is not counted as a scam call but as political campaigning explicitly exempt from FCC regulation, if necessary by erecting some shallow legal/fiscal scaffolding around the actual flows of money, interest, and power.

Putin cannot wait to see Trump again in a position where he obliterates U.S. and free world foreign interests. In some respect, he already does, but that is peanuts compared to what he will do if he reclaims power or at least claims to have reclaimed power.

So expect robocalls routed/organized through Russia to be available at bargain prices (including sub-zero) to “Republicans”.

bhull242 (profile) says:

Re:

I think a problem is that when a Russian robocaller tries to persuade the recipient to vote for Trump by ticking off a number of outrageous bullshit almost-sounds-like-facts, […]

Is this a thing that actually happens? I wouldn’t be all that surprised if it did, but I’m not convinced that this even happens. Do you have any evidence for this claim?

Ninja says:

I believe the US is probably the outlier in terms of how extreme the problem is there but I’m considering moving to a white list scheme to receive calls. If the phone isn’t on my contacts then the call is instantly cut.

I’m not entirely sure if it happens there but I’ve got tons of calls of ppl trying to collect debts of someone else. In the beginning they were people and I patiently said every time that the phone does not belong to whoever owes them money but it simply doesn’t work.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

This raises another issue. I get obviously junk mail that looks “super official” pretending to be from my car’s manufacturer. I’m sure a lot of people open this mail thinking it’s about a recall or some such. A company can pull people’s registrations and send this scam mail. It’s just like scam calls and should be banned.

andrew_duane (profile) says:

Re: Re: About junk snail mail

The main difference is that snail mail costs $$. $ to print the mail and $ to send it even at bulk rate. Phone calls and email are effectively free, so there is a lot more of those most of the time. Of course, given that it’s election season here, my mailbox is crammed with candidate flyers (pretty much all of them for/against one specific candidate.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...