Republican Debt Ceiling Plan Would Screw Up Multiple Bipartisan Broadband Initiatives They Previously Claimed To Support
from the watch-what-i-do,-not-what-i-say dept
The GOP is currently trying to hold the global economy hostage by using the debt ceiling debate as a bludgeon. Mostly to implement budget cuts nobody likes (like major budget cuts at the VA, or cuts to vast swaths of the country’s already faltering social safety net). If it goes badly, economists warn the net result could be global economic chaos and a completely avoidable recession. No biggie.
More quietly, telecom insiders note that the GOP’s plans would also cut funding for a number of telecom initiatives the GOP previously claimed to support, such as boosting rural broadband access, or the already incompetently under-funded effort to rip out Chinese telecom gear from U.S. networks and replace it with less shoddy and surveillance prone alternatives.
Both the COVID relief (American Rescue Plan Act) and infrastructure (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) bills contained an historic amount of money for broadband expansion. While the GOP largely opposed both bills, they’ve been busy taking credit for the broadband expansion the bills made possible while hoping nobody’s smart enough to notice (fairly successfully, as it turns out).
Both bills did a number of other things as well, including funding fixes for the FCC’s terrible broadband maps, which are used to dictate which areas get priority in broadband funding. As well as shoring up broadband access for school children, something Republicans also claim to support when it comes time for fund raising campaigns and television ads.
But the GOP’s budget proposal attempts to unrealistically claw back a huge swath of this money, much of which has already been spent or is in the process of being spent:
A Democratic aide for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the record, said the bill “risks unraveling several, popular bipartisan programs.”
“This bill revokes funding for students’ internet connectivity, accurate broadband mapping, and ensuring our communications equipment is protected from espionage and disruption by hostile foreign governments like China,” the aide said.
The GOP’s response to these criticisms has been to simply lie and claim that accurate descriptions of their budget proposals are all lies. Granted the GOP’s attempts to “negotiate” for the better part of the last several decades have been to propose outlandish, unpopular and extreme bullshit, then settle somewhere slightly more cogent, with the net result still generally being terrible and unpopular.
Republicans have spent a large chunk of the last year taking credit for broadband proposals they didn’t actually support and would now be dismantled by their own proposal. They’ve also nabbed endless cable news appearances hyperventilating about Chinese infiltration of U.S. telecom networks, and now want to cut already under-funded efforts to do anything about it.
Democrats have no shortage of problems; corruption, competency, or otherwise. Especially in a telecom policy arena where even acknowledging that monopolies exist is viewed as somehow radical. But what the GOP has become is akin to an incontinent, lying toddler whose contribution to the complicated internet policy challenges of the modern era are generally of the flung fecal variety.
The GOP now inhabits an alternative reality where they support or oppose varying policies by the day depending on how they believe it helps them in cable news appearances and fund raising. All while the feckless mainstream press gives the party unearned credibility for adult internet policymaking that isn’t, and policies the party never meaningfully supported in the first place.
When the GOP is pressed on its slide into radical policy incoherence, the response is the intellectual equivalent of a wet fart. In case it’s not yet abundantly evident, this all ends in disaster without a massive upheaval of the corrupt congressional gerontocracy, some significant introspection by a gullible/complicit press, and an Earth-shaking electoral sea change.
Filed Under: arpa, bead, broadband, chinese network gear, debt ceiling, fcc maps, gop, iija, internet policy, rip and replace, school broadband, telecom


Comments on “Republican Debt Ceiling Plan Would Screw Up Multiple Bipartisan Broadband Initiatives They Previously Claimed To Support”
Every election we’re given the choice between incompetents and criminals, which tends to dampen my enthusiasm for the whole ordeal. Our political system has all of the integrity of professional wrestling, but none of the entertainment value. It matters little who wins, because in the end we all lose.
Re:
i’m hardly the most optimistic person, but we can, and have, replaced corrupt fuckwits with better. We can encourage more of the better sorts to run for office.
Re:
You can stop saying “both sides” and acting like it makes you deep, dude. The New York Times may be hiring, but they’re not doing it through the Techdirt comments.
Re: Not helping vs Actively making things worse, choices choices...
Both your options may be bad but they’re hardly bad equally.
When you’re got two options, one person who’s watching your house burn down and offering the occasional cup of water and encouraging words and one person who’s throwing buckets of gasoline on the fire as fast as they can that really shouldn’t be a difficult choice.
Re: Re:
It’s a terrible thing that those are the two options Americans have for governing their country.
Re: Re: Re:
‘Incompetence’ or ‘malice’ make for poor choices come voting day, no argument there.
Re: Re: Re:
It’s a dilemma, like voting for either of Kang or Kodos. Either way, you get screwed.
Re: Re: Re:2
It’s not a pleasant set of choices but it’s really not a dilemma at all. As I noted in my first reply while both are bad they’re not bad equally so it comes down to whether you want someone who isn’t helping you or someone who’s actively trying to screw you over.
Both choices are bad but one of those is much worse than the other so choosing which shouldn’t take much consideration.
If you don’t know exactly what the “Debt Ceiling” is why it exists, then you are unable to rationally discuss this topic.
Most Congressmen and most Americans don’t know.
Re:
“Debt Ceiling”
Well, in a word, bullshit – that’s what it is.
It is money already approved and spent, there is nothing to debate – you pay your bills.
Anyone remember?
‘Where’s the beef?’
I just want to know, ‘Where’s all that money going to?’
Its not paying off the money we Owe China.
Re:
… which money is that, sir?
Re: Re: thats good q:
The billions the USA got during the Bush war.
They didnt want to declare war and raise taxes on the crops.
OR did we pay that off, by Killing off most of our gov. agencies?
Re: Re: Re:
https://usafacts.org/articles/which-countries-own-the-most-us-debt/
As of January 2023, foreign countries own $7.4 trillion in Treasuries — or roughly 24% of total US debt.[1] Over the past two decades, central banks and other government entities have owned 50-75% of foreign-owned debt over the past two decades.[2] Independent investors and companies held the rest.
Between 2000 and 2022, Japan grew from owning $534 billion to just over $1 trillion, while China’s ownership grew from $101 billion to $855 billion.
As of January 2023, the five countries owning the most US debt are Japan ($1.1 trillion), China ($859 billion), the United Kingdom ($668 billion), Belgium ($331 billion), and Luxembourg ($318 billion).
Re: Re: Re:2
This is a bit misleading. While true, it doesn’t paint the full picture.
China’s debt (in a similar pattern to Japan’s), went from $101B in 2000 to $492B at the beginning of 2008. Then there was a rapid rise (likely due to the 2008 economic issues) to $1,160B by the end of 2010.
Since then it has been largely steady with a slight increase for a few years and a slight decline after.
As to where the money goes, it goes to the budget. That’s a stupid question.
Re: Re: Re:3 Budget?
So the USA cant even cover its OWN budget?
Even tho we had Most of it almost paid off, around 2000.
WE still owe MORE?
And all these cuts to the rich? WHY?
Re:
It’s clearly not a lot in country debt terms, and uh
Unless I’m mistaken, that debt is what keeps the economy going.
Re:
“the money we Owe China”
Oh no – not this trope again