TSA Confirms Biometric Scanning Soon Won’t Be Optional Even For Domestic Travelers
from the nice-travel-option...-be-a-shame-if-something-happened-to-it dept
Ah, mission creep. The government loves it. Keeps people employed, keeps citizens on their toes, keeps privacy-focused sites in business, etc.
In 2017, the DHS began quietly rolling out its facial recognition program, starting with international airports and aimed mainly at collecting/scanning people boarding international flights. Even in its infancy, the DHS was hinting this was never going to remain solely an international affair.
It made its domestic desires official shortly thereafter, with the TSA dropping its domestic surveillance “roadmap” which now included “expanding biometrics to additional domestic travelers.” Then the DHS and TSA ran silent for a bit, resurfacing in late 2022 with the news it was rolling out its facial recognition system at 16 domestic airports.
As of January, the DHS and TSA were still claiming this biometric ID verification system was strictly opt-in. A TSA rep interviewed by the Washington Post, however, hinted that opting out just meant subjecting yourself to the worst in TSA customer service. Given the options, more travelers would obviously prefer a less brusque/hands-y trip through security checkpoints, ensuring healthy participation in the TSA’s “optional” facial recognition program.
A little more than two months have passed, and the TSA is now informing domestic travelers there will soon be no way to opt out of its biometric program. (via Papers Please)
Speaking at an aviation security panel at South by Southwest, TSA Administrator David Pekoske made these comments:
“We’re upgrading our camera systems all the time, upgrading our lighting systems,” Pekoske said. “(We’re) upgrading our algorithms, so that we are using the very most advanced algorithms and technology we possibly can.”
He said passengers can also choose to opt out of certain screening processes if they are uncomfortable, for now. Eventually, biometrics won’t be optional, he said.
“Eventually” is a rather vague timeframe. ASAP would be the TSA’s preference. TSA chief Pekoske likes it because, like the head of any sizable entity, the possibility of providing even fewer people with employment opportunities appeals to him. According to his comments at the panel, the TSA expects passenger loads to increase about 4% a year. The use of this tech means the TSA won’t have to hire more agents to handle the increase in workload.
But Pekoske is not just a guy who likes seeing fewer people employed. He’s also a salesman. Biometrics may be faster than interacting with humans during identity validation, but it’s a tradeoff not everyone wants to make. Pekoske buries the problematic aspects of biometric harvesting in exchange for domestic travel “privileges” by claiming this is all about making things better for passengers.
“It’s critically important that this system has as little friction as it possibly can, while we provide for safety and security,” Pekoske said.
Yes, you’ll get through screening a little faster. Unless the AI is wrong, in which case you’ll be dealing with a whole bunch of new problems most agents likely won’t have the expertise to handle. Pekoske claims this version is the best version of its facial recognition tech, making a completely unbelievable claim the new tech “hasn’t found any problems with passengers with darker complexions.” It may have fewer problems, but even the best facial recognition AI is still less accurate when dealing with anyone other than white males.
More travelers. Fewer agents. And a whole bunch of screens to interact with. That’s the plan for the nation’s airports and everyone who passes through them.
Filed Under: biometric scanning, data, dhs, facial recognition, mandatory, papers please, privacy, tsa
Comments on “TSA Confirms Biometric Scanning Soon Won’t Be Optional Even For Domestic Travelers”
Nope!
Once again a clueless non-technical person thinks tech will magically do The Thing without ultimately costing a ton of $$$ and ending up a colossal failure.
Nevertheless, now’s your chance to update your wardrobe, everyone!
Re:
You think contempt-of-TSA will end up better than contempt-of-cop?
Re: Re:
Yes. The TSA does not carry guns. They call the people with guns when there’s an altercation.
Re: Re: Re:
I mean, technically true, but being better than contempt-of-cop is such a small bar to trip over, being better than contempt-of-cop really shouldn’t be something worth congratulating.
Re: Re: Re:
Also, they can stop you flying anywhere ever.
Re: Re: Re:2 Going Nowhere Even Faster
This whole thing is why I stopped flying myownself, and bought an RV. I figure that if someone needs me to be on the other coast in a hurry, then they can send a charter jet for me. Otherwise, I plan ahead, and enjoy a leisurely trip on my terms, not those of The Security Theater Kids.
Re: Interesting garments
But I suspect they would fail at Airports. The clothing looks like it’s intended to defend against general surveillance where whole body images are being taken. Doubtful they would work against a kiosk style system where the camera is aimed at a single head. As for the hood, it’s likely that the TSA worker would simply require you to remove it.
But definitely interesting clothing. Gotta wonder how long that clothing would remain an effective countermeasure against general surveillance.
Golly gee, once they have all those validated face scans connected to driver’s licenses and passports, what other government agencies will join the party. Bye, bye, fourth amendment. (Wouldn’t be surprised if they happened to capture your phone’s EIN as you waltz by. I suspect they’re also working on a way to snag a DNA sample.)
Whenever an organization claims something will make things better for passengers or customers or citizens, it is certain to be something to make things better for the organization, and worse for hover they are claiming will benefit.
Im a white guy with no criminal record
Thus I look forward to booking my room at Gitmo in advance for the obvious threat I pose to the flying public and National Security.
Re:
And thanks to identity theft being a thing, expect Interpol to make a visit too.
Yeah and since they’ve never provided safety ever, there goes the crap argument with no further consideration.
My pops already got pulled aside due to facial rec
Just traveled for spring break and my pops got pulled aside for extra screening because his “facial features were flagged as not matching the person who used the passport on the flight to florida the previous week”. It was an immediate thing soon as the tsa guy scanned his passport. So they scan and store and conpare via automated system as the tsa guy wasnt sitting there conparing two photos.