What Transparency? Twitter Seems To Have Forgotten About Transparency Reporting
from the that-ain't-transparent dept
One of the key things that Elon Musk promised in taking over Twitter was about how he was going to be way more transparent. He’s mentioned it many times, specifically noting that transparency is how he would build “trust” in the company.




So, anyway, about that… over a decade ago, the big internet companies set the standard for companies publishing regular transparency reports. Twitter has released one every six months for years. And since Musk’s takeover, I’ve wondered if that would continue.
Twitter’s last transparency report — published in July 2022 and covering the last six months of 2021 — found that the U.S. government made more requests for account data than any other government, accounting for over 24 percent of Twitter’s global requests. The FBI, Department of Justice, and Secret Service “consistently submitted the greatest percentage of requests for the six previous reporting periods.” Requests from the U.S. government were down seven percent from the last reporting period but Twitter’s compliance rate went up 13 percent in the latter half of 2021.
Normally, Twitter would have published the transparency data for the first half of 2022 in January of 2023. Yet, here we are.
“Elon talked a lot about the power of transparency. But the way Elon and his enablers interpret transparency is a rather creative use of the word. It’s not meaningful transparency in the way the industry defines it,” one former Twitter employee familiar with the reports tells Rolling Stone.
[….]
“We were working on the transparency reports, then all the program leads were immediately fired, and the remaining people that could’ve worked on the reports all left subsequently,” one former staffer says. “I’m not aware of any people left [at Twitter] who could produce these transparency reports.”
The former Twitter staffer adds, “It’s really a problem that there’s no transparency data from 2022 anywhere.”
Speaking to former Twitter employees, I had two of them confirm that Twitter actually had the transparency report more or less ready to go before Musk took over (remember, the January release would cover the first half of 2022 so they had time to work on it). But apparently, it’s either been lost or forgotten.
And, of course, this is a real shame, as Twitter had been seen as one of the companies that used transparency reports in more powerful ways than other companies. It was widely recognized as setting the bar quite high.
“Twitter had some of the best transparency reporting of any platform,” says Jan Rydzak, company and investor engagement manager at Ranking Digital Rights, a program hosted by the Washington, D.C., think tank New America that grades tech and telecom firms on the human-rights goals they set.
“Transparency reporting has been an important tool for companies to demonstrate to their users how they protect their privacy and how they push back against improper government requests for their data,” adds Isedua Oribhabor, business and human rights lead at Access Now, whose 2021 Transparency Reporting Index commended Twitter for nine straight years of reporting.
As we’ve discussed before, while all the other larger internet companies caved to DOJ demands regarding limits on how they report US law enforcement demands for information, Twitter actually fought back and sued the US government for the right to post that information. And while it unfortunately lost in the end (years later), that’s the kind of thing that shows a commitment to transparency which helps build trust.
In place of that, Musk’s “transparency” seems to be to cherry pick information, hand it to people who don’t understand it, but who will push misleading nonsense for clicks. That doesn’t build trust. It builds up a cult of ignorant fools.
Filed Under: elon musk, transparency, transparency reports, trust
Companies: twitter


Comments on “What Transparency? Twitter Seems To Have Forgotten About Transparency Reporting”
And all of the Musky Ones believe their leader is a demigod incapable of making mistakes. To wit: Matty B (or one of his fractured facsimilies, at any rate).
Kinda hard to be transparent when you fired those folks out of sheer spite and what’s left are hardcore sycophants or forced to do Musk’s bidding or get deported…
Unfortunately, the transparency Elon means is one that’s pure propaganda about himself and the promotion of white supremacy…
While I don’t know Musk personally, From what I’ve seen, I suspect he doesn’t see a difference between the two.
That's a feature, not a bug
That doesn’t build trust. It builds up a cult of ignorant fools.
Otherwise known as ‘exactly the sort of people the new owner wants on his platform’.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Damnit, you just couldn't stay away could you?
I wasn’t even going to count the earlier gaslighting over how you’re totally against government censorship earlier against your MDS counter (it was just dumb an ill-informed).
“Musk is a hypocrite and big bad stinky face because he says ‘transparency’ and then doesn’t do it exactly the way I think he should!!!”
OK, bro. You’re usually making up shit to whine about Musk over but this is more made up than most of them.
Re:
And which Matty B am I speaking to right now? Are you sure you’re M and not Q or E?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Be smarter. You’re enough of a fan to know it’s me.
Re: Re: Re:
How can I know that which is unknowable and think that which is unthinkable since I can’t know what you’re thinking and I can’t think about what you’re knowing? You can be anyone or no one, you can be M or R or X, and no one can know for sure because who’s to say which letter is the real you? Maybe you’re just one shard of a fractured mind that’s piecing itself back together until it thinks it knows what it thinks. You are faceless in a sea of faces and you’re drowning in the immenseness of your own insignificance, so how can we know you didn’t think up this scheme to make yourself known to those who don’t care to think about you?
You have a name and yet you are anonymous—a face without a face, a voice without a voice, a person without a personality. Revel in what you are, dear M, for you are a nowhere man who can be everywhere and nowhere all at once, be anyone and no one at the drop of a mask. Accept your weakness as your strength and take advantage of what I cannot: an easy way out.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
I’m going to quote daddy Chozen and offer you the one nugget of wisdom you deserve. Suck my fat cock you piece of shit!
Re: Re: Re:3
You want respect from and power over other people, but you can’t respect yourself enough to exert willpower over your own childlike whimpering. What hope do you have of finding relevance, nowhere man, when you make yourself irrelevant by saying a lot but voicing nothing?
Re: Re: Re:4
It really is the bastion of love and tolerance with these chumps.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Context should be a clue. Also certain speech (writing) patterns.
You seem it sometimes, but you’re not actually that dumb.
Re: Re: Re:3
I’m dumber than you know and smarter than you think, but I can’t say the same for you, M. Bring out one of your more intelligent shards so maybe it can say something more cutting.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3
That’s not me, but Masnick isn’t going to stop it because he’s that obsessed with making me look dumb.
Re: Re: Re:2
You are clearly speaking to the Matthew ChatCPT Bennett.
Re:
You seem to be an expert on all things Musk. What is true, what is made up.
Of Masnick’s post, above, what specific things are made up?
And, disprove the assertion: “Musk talks a big game about Transparency, but Twitter is less transparent now than it was pre-Musk.”
Man, back in the day, trolls were worth something.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
OK
That one. For one thing, it’s just an opinion, and not a very well thought out one.
Tell me, what are the units on Transparency?
And your comment was marked insightful. I have never seen a bigger indictment of readership.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Easy:
That one. You realize that’s an opinion, right? (a pretty indefensible one) There’s no units on “transparency”. But you’re treating it as if it’s ironclad facts and asking me to “refute” it.
Absolultely amazing.
Re: Re: Re:
Except there’s literal evidence of Twitter being less transparent in the article you’re commenting on, you dense dipshit.
Re:
By the sound of it, he doesn’t do it at all.
If you’re going to bitch about other people making shit up, maybe don’t make shit up on your own first.
Re:
Looks like I’m speaking to a brick wall, but nevertheless:
If a guy buys a platform based — in part — on the premise that it is supposedly being unduly influenced by the government, and then makes the company cease doing the main thing that gives users a view of how state power is exercised against the platform without stating why, that is worthy of criticism.
If the baseline established before you bought the company was that users would regularly be given an insight into attempted attempts to wield the law against the platform, you need a good, substantive reason to stop doing it.
Re:
As always, Matty has no evidence that backs up his gaslighting that Mike was gaslighting.
Re:
And what about that was a lie?
We already know he fired a bunch of people.
We already know that communication has broken down both from a PR perspective (and other external communication) and within the company itself.
We know the transparency reports have stopped.
That quite objectively means Twitter is less transparent than it was before.
So tell us, where’s the lie?
Re:
I’m pretty sure most people would agree that “the way I think he should” do transparency would at least include the literal transparency report that Twitter has been doing for years.
What exactly are you claiming is made up here? Have Twitter released a recent transparency report or not?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Well, no, I wouldn’t. Not least of all because most of what Old Twitter did was meaningless obfuscation. I don’t think anyone would find that “transparent”, if they knew what they were talking about, which is basically ).5% of the commenters here.
Haven’t seen any of that, except for the last bit because of the twitter files. (and much of that was apparently erased) That would be transparency.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
Sorry, but the fool trying to post like me above wasn’t me. I don’t act like this much of an idiot tool.
Re: Re: Re:2
It may not seem that way from where you’re sitting…
Re: Re: Re:2
Liar.
Re: Re: Re:2
True.
N Bennett is at least funny, if somewhat troublesome.
You, on the other hand, are an abusive harasser who will not stop until Mike actually bans you from the site.
Trust, Transparency, Free Speech… I don’t think those words mean what Musk thinks they mean.
Twitter and Musk could not be immediately reached for comment.
Re:
It’s definitely your avatar, but I read that comment in Oscar the Grouch’s voice.
Re:
Twitter could not immediately be reached for comment, because Twitter does not have any media relations team.
I prefer that caveat at the end, because it really underscores how little transparency exists
Re: Re:
I thought the media found the one H1B Visa employee/sycophant Musk forgot to fire and called that poor schmuck Twitter’s media relations team…
This just in: corporate overlord makes big promises, fails to live up to them.
Twitter has become that scifi trope where the people no longer understand the technology nor all the functions of the technology or their society, but has morphed into a cult run by officious weirdos. Only it didn’t take like 30 generations disconnected from the rest of humanity.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Yeah buddy, you totally understand the technology, ANY technology, and Elon Musk doesn’t.
Re:
Firing the people who understand what everything does and how to run it tends to speed that process along.
Oh wait, also LMAO @ Lex Fridman. SMFH
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
We know that you loved the viewpoint-based censorship that Twitter’s old management provided for you, and you despise the new management for taking that censorship away, but posting endless numbers of articles disparaging Musk isn’t going to bring the censorship back.
Re:
You got anything other than your workshopped right-wing script, Hyman?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
“There you go again” worked superbly well for Ronald Reagan. Who am I to go against the work of the master debater?
Joking aside, the truth doesn’t need creative restating every time it needs to be said. It just needs to be said. Naturally, woke ideologues hope their opponents will be silent, perhaps out of fatigue. Not going to happen.
Re: Re: Re:
You’re a pillock who gets worked up over name changes, I don’t think you’ve got a firm ground to stand on in re: ‘stating the truth’.
Re:
[citation needed]
Oh no
Mike, are you being mean to poor, put upon Mr Musk again?
I think you’re going to find that one or two of your commenters will have a disappoint about that.
Tsk,tsk 🙂
Re:
The one with MDS (Mike Derangement Syndrome) you mean?
Re: Re:
Which ones?
That doesn’t narrow it down very much, you know…
They’re so transparent there’s nothing to see
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Who cares?
Seriously, Mike – who cares?
Re:
You obviously do, otherwise you wouldn’t have posted.
Re: Re:
Maybe they are just a tsundere.
Re:
Other than you?
The FTC, for one. Oh, and all the people Elon owes money to.