AT&T Hit With $23 Million Fine For Bribing Illinois Lawmaker
from the just-another-day-in-the-office dept
In just the last decade or so AT&T has been fined $18.6 million for helping rip off programs for the hearing impaired; fined $10.4 million for ripping off a program for low-income families; fined $105 million for helping “crammers” rip off their customers; fined $60 million for lying to customers about the definition of “unlimited” data; and accused of ripping off U.S. schools for decades.
The company’s also no stranger to using sleazy lobbying to get whatever it wants, whether that’s less competition, fewer consumer protections, rubber stamped mergers, or gigantic tax breaks that serve no useful public purpose. The vast, vast majority of the time the company faces absolutely no repercussion for its dodgy lobbying practices, especially those on the state level.
That luck recently ran out in Illinois, where the company was fined $23 million for bribing a state lawmaker’s ally in order to secure a key policy vote. According to a deferred prosecution agreement, the vote in question was a 2017 vote on Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) legislation that would have eliminated AT&T’s obligation to continue to provide landline service to all state residents.
AT&T of course wants to be free of having to provide dated landlines. Consumer groups are quick to note many of those landlines are used by old people who often can’t afford (or don’t understand how to use) cellular service, leaving them cut off from essential services and 911. They were also paid for on the back of millions in taxpayer subsidies, suggesting that taxpayers should have some say in the matter.
Instead of just making its case, AT&T used an intermediary lobbying firm to deliver $22,500 to former Illinois Speaker of the House Michael J. Madigan to influence his vote:
AT&T allegedly used a lobbying firm as an intermediary to make the payment and disguise its true purpose. US Attorney John Lausch’s office filed a one-count criminal information in US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, charging AT&T Illinois with using an interstate facility to promote legislative misconduct. Former AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza was indicted on five charges as a result of the same investigation.
As somebody that has covered AT&T for 22 years now, I know this kind of dirty pool happens pretty much constantly. In many states, AT&T all but owns the entirety of the state legislature, routinely literally writing state telecom policy and legislation. The vast, vast majority of the time, AT&T sees absolutely no penalty for the behavior, making this a rare occurrence.
AT&T’s no stranger to these kinds of tactics on the federal level either. In the last five years alone the company managed to secure a massive $42 billion tax break in exchange for doing nothing, gutted the FCC and its consumer protection authority, eliminated both net neutrality and broadband privacy rules, and is currently helping to gridlock the nomination of FCC nominee Gigi Sohn.
All to protect its regional telecom monopoly, stall competition, and ensure U.S. consumer protection enforcement is a feckless mess. You don’t get to enjoy six straight years of captured federal lawmakers without breaking more than a few of the nation’s already extremely pathetic lobbying rules (like that time AT&T paid Trump fixer Mike Cohen $600k to gain inside access to the Trump White House).
Filed Under: bribes, bribing, consumer protection, corruption, illinois, landlines, michael madigan, paul la schiazza, telecom
Companies: at&t


Comments on “AT&T Hit With $23 Million Fine For Bribing Illinois Lawmaker”
strange how this can happen when it’s a lawmaker involved! no one gives a flyin’ fuck about what AT&T does to screw up their customers or the service given to them!!
And the voters don’t seem to care.
The fact one corrupt legislator can ram this through shows how broken the current system is.
Re:
It wasn’t just any lawmaker, it was the Speaker of the House in Illinois who was also the party leader for the Democrats in Illinois. That’s a fairly powerful lawmaker.
CEO's response
Overheard in AT&T CEO’s office:
$23 million fine? (To administrative assistant) Check the couch for loose change.
Re:
exactly what I was thinking. It’s like that scene in the Simpsons episode Treehouse of Horror II when Homer Simpson is fined for smuggling by the Moroccan authorities for…wait for it…US$2.
In an alternate universe...
Imagine if our government was strong enough to break up such large behemoths, jail their executives and ensure there was public competition (say, municipal broadband)?
I’m sure such a magical land of fairy dust and unicorns would have other benefits, too.
Yeah, putting the penalty so low actively incentivizes such bribery – just make sure you keep some cash to pay off the courts, and you’re good to go. Of course, that may be the system working as intended…
Apology
AT&T would like to offer its deepest apologies to anyone among our management, stock holders or investors who were harmed by our thoughtless, selfish, criminal actions of bribing a lawmaker’s ally in exchange for a vote. The company deeply regrets this incident and any harm or injury that it has caused to our public image or relations with our vendors or our bottom line.
I would like to offer my personal assurance that a public scandal like this will not happen again in the future. We will do better. New policies are being created within the company to ensure that you will never again hear or read about an incident like this occurring within our company. I offer my deepest regrets to the board of directors for any embarrassment this has caused.
To anyone else who has been harmed by our selfish and harmful actions, We would like to extend our sincerest indifference.
The people of Illinois should be outraged…
They know that politicians take bribes, but for them to sell them out for such low figures is an insult.
On a more serious question…
If AT&T gets their dream to have states allow them to dump POTS lines, does that mean 1 less asshole getting in the way of other companies putting up wires?
No party affiliation?
Oddly I don’t see any mention that Michael Madigan is the Chair of the Democratic Party of Illinois, but instead you end on a Trump anecdote.
Don’t you think that’s a bit misleading?
Re:
“Oddly I don’t see any mention that Michael Madigan is the Chair of the Democratic Party of Illinois”
Maybe because he resigned in 2021. They maybe could have mentioned affiliation, but he no longer has that position.
Odd
This law was a tricky idea though.
Should a company be forced to supply a service against their will at their own loss?