5G Wireless Nibbles Away At Cable Industry’s Broadband Dominance
from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept
Thanks to their dominance over broadband access in the U.S., cable companies had spent the last decade seeing significant broadband subscriber growth each and every quarter, since, well, there weren’t any other options. That ended during the second quarter of 2022, when companies like Comcast failed to add any new broadband subscribers for the first time in history.
All told, cable giants in the U.S. lost about 60,000 subscribers during the second quarter. Companies like Charter and Comcast used to be able to weather losses in cable TV subscribers due to broadband, but not anymore. Last quarter both companies saw losses on both fronts.
So what’s happening?
For one, some telcos that have long skimped on fiber upgrades (most notably AT&T and Frontier) have finally realized that they should more meaningfully invest in the networks. Especially AT&T, which has doubled down on fiber upgrades after flinging untold billions of dollars at media megamergers that went absolutely nowhere. While telcos still lost 85,000 subscribers last quarter (mostly due to the ongoing exodus of annoyed DSL users), they’re challenging cable with fiber in more locations.
But what appears to be truly upending the cable monopolies’ good time is the growth in 5G and fixed wireless services; the only sector that saw meaningful broadband subscriber growth last quarter:
Fixed wireless/5G home Internet services from T-Mobile and Verizon added about 815,000 subscribers in 2Q 2022 – compared to about 120,000 net adds in 2Q 2021
While promising, there’s still a long way to go before you could call U.S. broadband a healthy market.
Cable broadband providers still enjoy a comfortable monopoly in most markets and continue to dominate in market share. As of the end of the last quarter, U.S. cable providers had 75.6 million broadband subscribers, top wireline phone companies had roughly 32.2 million subscribers, and top fixed wireless services saw just 2.2 million subscribers.
With 5G fueling a lot of faster, better, fixed wireless solutions for the home, most of the current growth is in wireless. And while wireless is a great option for some, it often comes with various network restrictions and constraints, and is no substitute for affordable, future-proof fiber.
An estimated 83 million Americans still live under a broadband monopoly with the choice of just one broadband ISP, usually Comcast or Charter. Wireless and services like Starlink can help, but as we noted in our recent Copia report on broadband access, the deployment of affordable fiber by municipalities, cooperatives, and utilities is where the real potential for competitive disruption resides.
Enter the U.S. government, which is about to throw more than $50 billion in new subsidies at the broadband industry thanks to COVID relief and infrastructure bills. And as we’ve noted, the biggest and most politically powerful providers are working overtime trying to tilt the policy playing field to ensure that massive surge in funding goes to them, and not any of their smaller competitors.
While we’re re-arranging the deck chairs somewhat, U.S. broadband remains a largely consolidated, heavily monopolized sector that’s routinely protected by state and federal corruption. Wireless alone (which is itself increasingly consolidated) can’t fix that.
Filed Under: 5g, broadband, cable, competition, fiber, monopolies


Comments on “5G Wireless Nibbles Away At Cable Industry’s Broadband Dominance”
Some Congress critter ought to introduce a bill for a federal law that says anywhere there’s two or fewer telecom providers and such providers are charging unreasonably high prices for the services they provide, and/or they’re in the habit of accepting subsidies but providing little to nothing to show for them, then states are positively encouraged to provide municipal broadband and like services and will be free of lawsuits from telecoms companies. I think that’s the only way to fix this. Hey, Ron Wyden. If you still read this blog, could you please get on that?
Re: We can go further
Why make preemption of bans on municipal broadband conditional? Congress should unconditionally ban these bans.
Re: Re:
Perhaps Autie’s trying to encourage telecom companies to engage in actual competition, and the hammer being brought down only if they don’t.
Re: Re: Re:
No, because I don’t have that power. But I am supporting legislation that will do that.
Great
This is a good news! 👍
The bad broadband
There’s only one major flaw in 5G at this time.
Nobody with 5G Denys the advancement. With the mm option available, 300Mbps to 500Mbps is common. It’s halfway giga-speed but it’s enough to brows the web, download email, stream a film (or even a live show) in 4k or 5k and kill baddies in your game, at the same time.
But the problem for those that DO have access is its inconsistency. Maintaining that 400 is not common. Even stationary.
Like all satellite TV, wind…is an enemy. That big old branch moves just a little bit and bam, 80mbps. And hopping back into the high end isn’t a guarantee.
(There your are, bang, game over).
5GUC is epic for mobile use. And great even in the lower end of the speed spectrum. Far better than LTE.
But it’s not there for stationary yet.
Even if you manage uc through a window (forget walls), if you don’t have a clear line of sight to the tower you’re inconsistent.
In the short time no sit still typing this out, I’ve had UC, Base 5G, and LTE.
Re: CE
Wind is still an enemy with 5G cell.