Billions In Broadband Funding Begin To Flow… Before We’ve Mapped Broadband Gaps
from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept
As we’ve previously noted, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will dole out an historic $65 billion to shore up broadband access. $42 billion of that total will directly fund a Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) grant program overseen by the NTIA. It’s a massive infusion of money, and much of it should have a genuine, productive impact on the nation’s longstanding broadband gaps.
The continued problem: we still haven’t accurately measured where U.S. broadband is or isn’t available, and there’s still no hard date for when long-awaited mapping improvements will be finished.
Yet the NTIA announced it’s starting to dole out the money starting this week:
To participate in the BEAD Program, states and other eligible entities must submit a letter of intent and a planning funds budget, which will unlock $5 million in planning funds and allow states to begin creating their five-year action plan. Each state will have direct support from dedicated NTIA staff through every step of the process. Each participating state is guaranteed a minimum $100 million allocation, with additional funding determinations made based on the forthcoming coverage maps from the Federal Communications Commission.
That we still haven’t actually accurately mapped broadband availability (after spending $350 million on an FCC broadband map) continues to be a stunning policy failure we just like to glaze over.
Not only do many states not have accurate maps to determine where broadband is needed, many don’t have effective broadband offices or staff to do a lot of this heavy lifting. And the lifting will be heavy; to prevent the program from being abused by fraud (a good thing), the NTIA has saddled the funds with a lot of requirements industry watchers like Doug Dawson say may be costly and problematic:
When I started to make a full list of all of the grant requirements suggested by the NOFO, I realized that these are going to be the most complicated broadband grants ever – more complicated even than ReConnect grants. It looks like the NTIA made a list of everything that could possibly go wrong with a project or an ISP and made each into a grant requirement. Here are just a few of the new requirements I’ve never seen in a grant before: a cybersecurity plan, a climate resiliency plan, a supply chain risk management plan, a middle-class affordability plan, and a project workforce continuity plan if not using union labor.
The grant funds are going to be considered a taxable income by the IRS. The requirements will add a lot of costs that wouldn’t be present were a local community to explore construction and financing options on its own. That in turn might discourage a lot of new broadband providers from even bothering, assuming, again, their state can determine where broadband is and has the staff to tackle the grants.
Another problem: ISP lobbyists have convinced several states to restrict funding from going to any companies that compete with regional monopolies (which is forbidden by NTIA rules, but may or may not be enforced). Those same regional monopolies are also using existing, unreliable maps to saddle grant applications with costly additional challenges aimed at derailing projects.
Again, this isn’t too pooh-pooh broadband subsidies. They can be an exceptionally useful way to spur deployment of fiber to needed areas. The point here is to highlight how much potential for abuse exists given we failed to do the fundamentals, and how it’s a bit more complicated than just throwing billions of dollars at the problem and then claiming “mission accomplished.”
U.S. telecom has spent thirty-plus years mired in monopolization, and federal regulators have been so feckless and captured they’ve failed to even measure the scope of the problem. Throwing billions of dollars at the “digital divide” before fixing the underlying rot is like building a new house on a gigantic termite mound.
Filed Under: affordable access, BEAD grants, broadband, broadband maps, digital divide, fiber, high speed internet, ntia, regulatory capture, subsidies, telecom
Comments on “Billions In Broadband Funding Begin To Flow… Before We’ve Mapped Broadband Gaps”
Expecting the problem to be magically solved, by throwing enough money at it, how typical of American politics.
Re:
It works so well for the incumbent isps…
Re: Re: Alfred E Newman this
… because it’ll all be over before you can say “Extra Dividend!” at the stock holder’s meeting. If I’m reading it right – and I may not be because I’m not a legal professional, it looks like WISPs are specifically not allowed to avail themselves of any of these funds, unless they are partnered with an ILEC.
Re:
Hey, if this doesn’t fix your broadband troubles, you’ll soon be able to drive behind a schoolbus for access.
TLDR!
we need to CHECK the Backbone and see that it has been Installed properly.
We have to look for all the Holes in the system and PATCH them.
Find a ‘out of system’ company to work around the clock and then SCAN the whole system.
(let google do it, they have already shown they can, and Could of had it done while mapping everything.)
Get with the program
It’s a feature, not a bug. Why bother with tracking it when the money is going into the pockets of the rich? Where else does the money belong?
Middle-class affordablity
What the hell is middle class affordability?
Do they intend to make sure managers are carrying badges stating they are middle class, so can look down on the “peasants” they supply broadband to?
Such boon for the yachting industry
Those yachts aren’t going to buy themselves.