The ‘Race To 5G’ Was More Of A Waddle To Nowhere

from the meet-the-new-boss dept

We’ve noted for several years how the “race to 5G” was largely just hype by telecoms and hardware vendors eager to sell more gear and justify high U.S. mobile data prices. While 5G does provide faster, more resilient, and lower latency networks, it’s more of an evolution than a revolution.

But that’s not what telecom giants like Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T promised. Both routinely promised that 5G would change the way we live and work, usher forth the smart cities of tomorrow, and even revolutionize the way we treat cancer. None of those things wound up being true.

When 5G dropped in the U.S., network performance was significantly worse than most overseas deployments due to a dearth of middle-band spectrum. Less talked about (because it’s a preferred outcome for many) is the fact U.S. wireless data prices continue to be some of the highest in the developed world, something that only tends to increase with greenlit consolidation.

To hype the technology and sway regulators and lawmakers into doing whatever they wanted, wireless carriers have historically framed 5G deployments as a sort of “race.” But repeatedly data suggests that the U.S. has waddled its way to a mediocre showing:

America’s average 5G mobile internet speed is roughly 75 megabits per second, which is abysmal. In China’s urban centers 5G phones get average speeds of 300 megabits per second. Though that’s not quite the fastest 5G in the world—South Korea claims that title at over 400 Mbps—it’s still fast enough to download a high-definition movie in two minutes. 

U.S. consumers of course don’t care what’s happening in China and vice versa. Studies routinely show that U.S. consumers want two things: reliable coverage and lower prices. While the U.S. will slowly get the former as we increase deployment of middle band spectrum (which provides better coverage and high speeds), the latter has long been a non-starter in the face of regulatory capture.

That we must defeat China specifically in the nonexistent “race to 5G” was a very specific point made for years by telecom giants and the regulators and politicians beholden to them. Yet oddly very few have been willing to acknowledge that the U.S. is not only far behind China on 5G network performance, but we’re also significantly behind when it comes to 5G affordability:

Prices have been coming down fast in the ongoing price war, with China Mobile now selling its entry level 5G package for just 69 yuan ($9.76 US) a month, 31% off the original price. A premium 5G package that originally was priced at 128 yuan ($18.08 US) now sells for 88 yuan ($12.43 US), if the customer signs a one-year contract.

China Unicom, another competitor, has responded with price cuts of its own, reducing some plan prices by 30 percent. A popular 5G package called “5G Refreshing Ice Cream” costs 90 yuan ($12.72 US) per month, not including a small prepaid service fee and a 12-month contract. A premium 5G package is priced at 103 yuan ($14.55 US) per month and comes with a 24-month contract.

Please notice that most of the hand-wringing about losing the “race” to 5G that has bubbled up lately always excludes any mention of high prices. Almost as if industry is dictating most discourse in media coverage in a bid to downplay that aspect of the conversation.

Regardless, much of the “race” rhetoric was a specific rhetorical weapon of lobbyists used specifically to nudge regulators and lawmakers toward a preferred outcome (like mindlessly rubber stamping the T-Mobile Sprint merger, gutting town and city authority to determine 5G tower placement and rate structure in their own back yards, or killing net neutrality and FCC consumer protection authority).

But you’ll notice that giving wireless carriers and large hardware vendors like Cisco everything they wanted over the last five years (once again) didn’t result in the miracle improvements industry and its policy allies promised; it resulted in mediocrity–a fairly common story in U.S. telecom.

Time and time again, handing out favors to the biggest sector players trumps policies geared toward generating meaningful competition or protecting consumers and market health. And time and time again, across both wireless and fixed-line U.S. broadband networks, the end product is spotty service, slower speeds, and high prices.

Wash, rinse, and repeat to infinity, with nobody (usually quite intentionally) learning much of anything from the experience.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: at&t, t-mobile, verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “The ‘Race To 5G’ Was More Of A Waddle To Nowhere”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
vegetaman says:


This sort of garbage happens every time in tech (and I’m sure other fields). Sometimes it doesn’t even have much of anything behind it, like the mysterious “Web 2.0” I haven’t heard anybody mention in awhile. Any next gen item has a bad habit of getting co-opted by marketing speak and yielding unrealistic expectations and literal trash sales ads or investor hype pitches.

Anonymous Coward says:


Web 2.0 referenced a shift from static one-way content, website to end user, toward user generated content and interactivity. You don’t hear about web 2.0 anymore because it’s the world we live in. Facebook, twitter, youtube, newgrounds? Web 2.0. It wasn’t a change in technology, it was a change in design philosophy as bandwidth and server overhead costs got low enough that it was feasible for websites to be more dynamic and incorporate USG.

It wasn’t co-opted into marketing meaninglessness, rather it’s so ubiquitous it’s commonplace. And it’s not well suited to comparisons to the overselling of new technology used as an excuse to justify irresponsible business decisions.

Anonymous Coward says:

the various companies that have taken total control of the mobile phone, just like those that have with broadband, want all the subsidies they manage to cheat, lie and con out of various politicians, getting the funds from the public coffers, dont want 5G!! the problem is, if they agree to upgrading to it, they would have to lie even more than they do atm and perhaps have to start supplying it to customers! the last thing these companies wanna do is spend any of their ill-gotten gains! as far as they are concerned, those funds are simply extras that the top boys at the companies can lay claim to! customers can go fuck themselves if they actually expect any improvement in services etc!

Anonymous Coward says:

I think if every mobile user got fast 4g eg 10 to 30 Meg per second acess speed they would be happy to ignore 5g which will only be avaidable in city’s and urban areas in the USA , its alot easier to provide fast 5g in Korea and Japan where most people live in city’s and large towns . Of course some 5g is overhyped
if it allows big corporations to demand tax breaks or subsidys to build networks even as millions of americans in rural areas have no acess to basic broadband services

Lostinlodos (profile) says:

Those that have it

… all said those that actually have 5G are doing well with it. I routinely exceed the 300Mbps mark.

The problem is not what 5G can do! It’s regulations that reduce where it can be.

When a company chooses the best spot for a tower, local rich people shouldn’t be able to veto it. Especially if it’s not going on “their” land.
We had a heated debate locally about a tower not long ago that made it to the ballot!
The move lost. No tower.
And local coverage remains spotty.

That’s not good for the general public.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...