The Senate's Finsta Problem

from the that's-now-how-it-works dept

Earlier this year we wrote about Senator Richard Blumenthal’s viral “finsta” debacle in which he asked a Facebook executive to “end Finsta” as if (1) it was a product, or (2) it was “endable.” Some people pushed back on the mocking of Blumenthal, noting that he (or at least his staffers) actually understood what “finsta” meant, since he had given an accurate description earlier, and his staff had set up a fake Instagram account, pretending to be a young girl to see what happened. However, as we and others noted, if he actually understood “finsta” that made his demand to “end Finsta” even worse, because it meant he was calling for an end to anonymity on Instagram, which would have huge problems — especially for more marginalized people or those at risk, who have very good reasons for not using their real names on social media.

Of course, rather than learning from that debacle, Senators across the board seemed to see it as an opportunity to score some media headlines when they dragged in Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri to testify in yet another one of the Senate’s pointless, grandstanding “big tech bad” hearings last week. Senator Blumenthal brought back his finsta. On the other side of the aisle, both Senators Marsha Blackburn and Mike Lee rolled out their own finstas. And all of them were shocked, shocked, shocked, to find that sometimes they didn’t like what the algorithm recommended to them.

Except, as an article at the National Journal highlights, this little game of gotcha doesn’t make much sense and is not how good research is actually done.

Joshua Tucker, a co-director of the NYU Center for Social Media and Politics, said Senate staff don?t have the time or training to make broad inferences about how teens experience Instagram.

?In a sense these [fake accounts] are useful, because they are surfacing things that can happen on the platform,? Tucker said. ?But it?s this leap from ?it can happen? to ?this is prevalent, this is common??that?s when you need the more sophisticated research design.?

Tucker called it ?ironic? that lawmakers are deploying these fake accounts in hearings, given ongoing concerns from Blumenthal and others that ?finstas? are a menace and the fact that creating such accounts violates Instagram?s terms of service.

?These are exactly the types of protections that we are asking Congress to provide to researchers?to protect researchers who want to do research, who want to go about and find out how these platforms work, to protect them from being attacked by companies for violating terms of service,? Tucker said.

But, rather than handing access to actual researchers who can determine whether or not there’s a problem — and if there is a problem how big or how prevalent it is — Senators are instead pushing out garbage science. That is, they’re pushing anecdotal examples based on a single case set up in a way specifically designed to try to get the outcome they want.

Not surprisingly, when journalist Brendan Bordelon pointed all this out to Blumenthal’s office, it was dismissed in Blumenthal’s typically dismissive manner:

The Connecticut Democrat shrugged off the idea that there?s something ironic about his creation of a fake account, given his concerns about ?finstas? generally.

?I think it?s justified to be illustrative and then disclosed, and nothing done with it,? Blumenthal said. ?It?s not like we set it up to exist for any length of time. We set it up to see what happened, and then we shut it down.

?If I were analogizing it to law enforcement, it?s a little bit like having somebody work undercover,? he said.

It’s a misleading anecdote, and for someone who claims to be so concerned about misinformation, you’d think that Blumenthal would be careful not to create more of it.

And… that’s not even getting into the point that all of these Senators broke Instagram’s terms of service, and according to some interpretations of the law, that means they violated the CFAA. It seems like it would be a hell of a lot more productive to fix that, rather than freaking out about the other stuff.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: instagram

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “The Senate's Finsta Problem”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
8 Comments
ECA (profile) says:

the idea keeps coming back

There are allot of reasons to be ANON.
there are Few reasons that anon should not be allowed.
But in the end its all freedom of speech. right, wrong, opinion, suggestion, what ever.

Its amazing that When those in power Actually go out and see whats being Done, and said on the net, they are Shocked.
As if, it has never happened in RL. Just cause you dont talk about something dont mean it Aint happening.
I debated FB, about using true names, and didnt get anywhere. I dont even know where they got the idea that REAL names do anything good. Except to be able to track The person you want.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...