Document Freed By FOIA Shows How Much Data The FBI Can Obtain From Cellphone Service Providers

from the quite-a-bit-and-dating-back-for-quite-awhile dept

An internal FBI document shared with Joseph Cox of Motherboard by Ryan Shapiro of Property of the People gives a little more insight into law enforcement’s data grabs. The Third Party Doctrine — ushered into law by the Supreme Court decision that said anything voluntarily shared with third parties could be obtained without a warrant — still governs a lot of these collections.

For everything else, there are warrant exceptions, plain view, inevitable discovery, a variety of “exigent circumstances,” and reverse warrants that convert probable cause to “round up everyone and we’ll decide who the ‘usual suspects’ are.” Constitutional concerns still reside in this gray area, which means law enforcement will grab everything it can until precedent says it can’t.

The document [PDF] gives some insight into the FBI’s CAST (Cellular Analysis Survey Team). It shows how much the FBI has access to, how much it has the potential to grab, and how much unsettled law aids in bulk collection of data the FBI can parse through to find suspects or, if enough fishing rods are present, decide whether it has anything to do with its investigative time.

It’s all in there, starting with “Basic Cellular Theory” and moving on to everything cell-related the FBI can get its data mitts on.

CAST supports the FBI as well as state, local, and tribal law enforcement investigations through the analysis of call data and tower information, the presentation adds. That can include obtaining the data from telecommunications companies in the first place; analyzing tower dumps that can show which phones were in an approximate location at a given time; providing expert witness testimony; and performing drive tests to verify the actual coverage of a cell tower.

More specifically:

CAST will utilize industry standard survey gear drive test equipment to determine the true geographical coverage breadth of a cell site sector…

Hell yeah. Mapping the frontier except its a van full of feds out wardriving, Lewis-and-Clarking their way into OTA superiority.

Other information derived or directly included in this presentation shows CAST (and?) crew are leveraging minimal oversight and precedent to hoover up data, including historical cell site location data, which now has some constitutional protection. One CAST member Vice found on LinkedIn noted their “special emphasis” on long-term tracking via historical cell site data, apparently occasionally in service of solving serious crimes.

To that end, the FBI apparently operates its own software to help collect data from cell towers and cross reference it with whatever the agency can collect from other sources.

“CASTViz has the ability to quickly plot call detail records and tower data for lead generation and investigative purposes…”

There’s more to it. A lot of what’s discussed here has been discussed in the public sphere (courts, records requests, leaked documents, etc.), but even if the subject matter is familiar, it’s entertaining and educational to see the FBI’s (instructional) take on what is now a large part of current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. It discusses everything from grabbing location data from burner phones to General Motors’ OnStar in-vehicle systems.

The document also makes it clear not all service providers are created equal. Some are far more useful than others.

The presentation provides more recent figures on how long telecoms retain data for. AT&T holds onto data such as call records, cell site, and tower dumps for 7 years. T-Mobile holds similar information for 2 years, and Verizon holds it for 1 year.

The slide also shows that AT&T retains “cloud storage internet/web browsing” data for 1 year.

AT&T has always been proactive with its data-sharing. It has set up its own data centers where NSA analysts can grab communications and other data from AT&T internet backbones. This is on top of whatever it can offer on the telco side, including its millions of cell phone users. There are eight of these secret data centers in the United States. All of this helps explain why AT&T holds on to so much data for so long: it has plenty of federal customers to give it to.

There’s also some discussion of real-time tracking, which is governed by far fewer precedential decisions. The DOJ enacted a warrant requirement (with plenty of exceptions) for Stingray device use, but hasn’t done the same for real-time tracking via cell service providers. As it stands now, the Third Party Doctrine is controlling, which means warrants aren’t needed and if it’s a close call, a variety of exceptions would likely make use of these tools a “good faith” effort, legally speaking.

It’s a good peek into the FBI’s data collection habits, one that also shows how much cell providers collect and retain, which may provide guidance for privacy-minded individuals in the market for a new service provider.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Document Freed By FOIA Shows How Much Data The FBI Can Obtain From Cellphone Service Providers”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
ECA (profile) says:

Re: Note to Crimers

trying to be a Smart crook??
Then do it as 1 man, no friends ro worry about getting drunk or posting the WHOLE thing.
The day you do it, change the plates for out of area plates.
remember to douse the inside and out with Any acid to get rid of prints, Citric/Lemon juice works, or Just use Gas Fumes, dont need to BURN the car.
Also have a second car, 1-2 miles away to Jump into and ACT NORMAL. And if you get edgy, Smoke abit of weed or get a depressant, to CALM yourself after.

Have fun

ECA (profile) says:

Long ago, and far away.

I always wondered why the Landline and long distance kept going up in the past. And Long distance service was separate. And most times cost money even when NOT used.
Try scanning for this service, and you see some interesting things. MOST of it has gone virtual/internet. But you can Find the old service out there, and if you READ the contracts, there are allot of fee’s added. They state $30-35, then Add and add, and its in the $50 price range or more, if you want long distance.

This really forces people to use Wireless. Why? 1 Cell tower over building a Whole Wired system in an area? CHEAP? Connected to The backbone?(kinda limited) Unless they want to do this into the Tribal lands it would be very cheap. Anything Close to the freeway system, 20-40 miles Could be covered with Cell system, rather then using/building a WHOLE wired system to keep up and repair.
But then something Iv said before. The Wired system had SOME personal protections. ANd I dont think Many of them have transferred to Wireless.
And I wonder what our politicians have to think about this. Anyone want to run a stingray in the Capital(s)(state and fed). Or do you think all of this is going back to Word of mouth ONLY type thing.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...