Chanel Loses Trademark Dispute With Huawei Over Latter's Logo

from the smells-like-a-loss dept

It’s no secret that Chanel, the famous French luxury brand most notable for concocting things that make us smell better, is also a voracious protector of its trademarks. As evidence for this, one needs only to recall that the company once bullied a 2-person candy purveyor over its use of the number “5”. The point is, when Chanel comes a-calling complaining about trademarks, you really need to view it all with narrow eyes.

Chanel’s years-long trademark row with electronics company Huawei is no different. This story begins way back in 2017, when Huawei attempted to register a logo for its hardware division with EUIPO.

The dispute dated to 2017 when Huawei sought approval from the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), a trademark body, to register its computer hardware trademark which has two vertical interlocking semi-circles.

Privately owned Chanel objected, saying that the design was similar to its registered French logo of two horizontal interlocking semi-circles used for its perfumes, cosmetics, costume jewellery, leather goods and clothing.

How similar are the logos? Well, the answer is very, very similar… if you mean that they are exact opposites.

The Chanel logos are on the bottom and the Huawei logo in question is up top. Yes, there’s a circle enclosing both symbols. Yes both include interlocking shapes. But beyond that, the logos are essentially opposites. And, frankly, not the kind of opposite that calls to mind Chanel’s logo at all. Add to all of that the fact that these two companies compete in wildly different markets and it’s fairly crazy that Chanel thought it should kick off this dispute to begin with.

But it did. And then, in a 2019 decision by the trademark office, it lost. The trademark office indicated that the logos really weren’t similar at all. For some reason Chanel appealed that decision and lost there too.

The French luxury house subsequently challenged the ruling at the Luxembourg-based General Court, which dismissed the appeal in its ruling on Wednesday.

“The figurative marks at issue are not similar. The marks must be compared as applied for and registered, without altering their orientation,” the tribunal of judges said.

The tribunal said the visual differences in the two logos were significant.

“In particular, Chanel’s marks have more rounded curves, thicker lines and a horizontal orientation, whereas the orientation of the Huawei mark is vertical. Consequently, the General Court concludes that the marks are different,” it said.

It’s a decision as right as Chanel’s decision to start this fray was wrong. There is little if any chance of public confusion in this case, given the differences in the branding coupled with the divergent markets in which these companies operate.

The better question is why famous brands so often feel the need to gum up the works like this to begin with?

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: chanel, huawei

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Chanel Loses Trademark Dispute With Huawei Over Latter's Logo”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

The better question is why famous brands so often feel the need to gum up the works like this to begin with?

Because someone in charge believes it matters for something or other. Because it gives them publicity in places they otherwise wouldn’t. Because their oversized legal departments need something to pass the time with and justify their continued employment. And because they can.

Bill Poser (profile) says:

why so contrary?

The reason companies often give for being very aggressive about questionable trademark infringements is that if they do not enforce their trademarks they run the risk of losing them, an issue that does not arise with, e.g., copyright. They’re right, up to a point. Perhaps the problem could be reduced by the courts, or legislation, clarifying what counts as dilution of a trademark, e.g. making it clear that if the marks are used in widely different industries, there is no risk of losing a trademark due to lack of enforcement.

Anonymous Coward says:

The chanel logo looks like 2 interlocked Cs
The other logo is like 2 interlocked u,s
Huawei is a tech company it does not sell handbags or branded
I understand chanel is agreesive over its trademark as its whole business is based on people buying products that show the logo.
Eg I am rich I can afford to spend 1000 dollars on a handbag
No one is buying pcs or telecom routers thinking they might
made by a French fashion house
No one goes to a shop that sells fruit looking to buy an apple phone
Logos like Nike or chanel are worth billions cos people will pay
100s of dollars extra to buy a product with the right logo
The logo is a status symbol

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...