AT&T Spins Off DirecTV After Losing Billions On Its TV Dreams

from the money-can't-buy-you-love dept

We’ve noted a few times how giant telecom providers, as companies that have spent the better part of the last century as government-pampered monopolies, are adorable when they try (then inevitably fail) to innovate or seriously compete in more normal markets. Verizon’s attempt to pivot from curmudgeonly old phone company to sexy new ad media darling, for example, has been a cavalcade of clumsy errors, missteps, and wasted money.

AT&T has seen similar issues. Under former CEO Randall Stephenson, AT&T spent nearly $200 billion on mergers with DirecTV and Time Warner, hoping this would secure its ability to dominate the pay TV space through brute force. But the exact opposite happened. Saddled with so much debt from the deal, AT&T passed on annoying price hikes to its consumers. It also embraced a branding strategy so damn confusing — with so many different product names — it even confused its own employees.

As a result, AT&T intended to dominate the pay TV space, but instead lost 8 million pay TV subscribers since early 2017. Hoping to buy itself a little financial breathing room, AT&T has been shopping DirecTV around for months. But with few suitors interested in paying for a traditional satellite TV provider in the middle of a cord cutting revolution, AT&T instead last week settled on spinning off DirecTV and the rest of its pay TV operations into a new company. Under this new structure, AT&T will retain a 70% majority stake, with the other 30% being owned by private-equity giant TPG.

As part of the deal, AT&T valued the new DirecTV at around $16.2 billion, a massive loss from the $67 billion (including debt) AT&T paid for DirecTV back in 2015. AT&T begrudgingly admitted in a statement this wasn’t a particularly impressive feat:

“With our acquisition of DirecTV, we invested approximately $60 billion in the US video business,” AT&T said in materials distributed to reporters. “It’s fair to say that some aspects of the transaction have not played out as we had planned, such as pay TV households in the US declining at a faster pace across the industry than anticipated when we announced the deal back in 2014. In fact, we took a $15.5 billion impairment on the business in 4Q20.”

The deal buys AT&T a little financial leeway (immediately countered by its recent huge payout to grab additional wireless spectrum), but does little to change the underlying equation in AT&T’s attempt to dominate video. One of the bigger ironies is that AT&T spent countless man hours and millions in lobbying to grease the regulatory skids for its domination of television, be it the repeal of net neutrality, all the efforts to kiss up to the Trump administration, or the long legal battle over the anti-competitive impact of its Time Warner deal.

Yet all that money, energy, and political power couldn’t buy AT&T the kind of innovative chops needed to make inroads in the TV sector in the way they’d originally intended. It would be funny if not for the 54,000 AT&T employees laid off since 2017 in a bid to help manage megamerger debt. There was a real human cost to AT&T’s ambition that the press, more interested in hyping pre-merger “synergy” claims than tracking the deal’s actual impact, usually can’t be bothered to talk much about.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: at&t, directv

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “AT&T Spins Off DirecTV After Losing Billions On Its TV Dreams”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
14 Comments
PaulT (profile) says:

"pay TV households in the US declining at a faster pace across the industry"

Interesting phrasing. I suppose it depends on what you term as "pay TV". The people using Netflix, Disney+, HBO, Hulu, etc. seem to be paying for TV and that market is increasing rapidly across that same time period.

"a faster pace across the industry than anticipated"

Than YOU anticipated (again, accounting for definition of "the industry". Everyone else seemed to be quite aware of the trends at the time you started the deal, hence the constant mocking.

Anonymous Coward says:

Bad timing , they bought a satellite TV network
just as consumers are cutting the cord and switching to streaming TV apps and free TV
services
This will go down as one as the most expensive deals in history
It seems direct TV was extremely overpriced
en z sees pay TV satellite as a relic from the 80s
They watch TV on tablets phones game consoles or smart tvs

Federico (profile) says:

Out of sight, out of mind

This is merely a way to hide the bigger problems ahead from its shareholders. As Bloomberg’s Tara Lachapelle noted:

One of the biggest benefits, though, is that its earnings reports will no longer need to call attention to DirecTV, nor will executives have to continue struggling to defend owning the business. The magic words of Thursday’s press release: “Following close of the transaction, AT&T expects to deconsolidate the U.S. video operations from its consolidated results.”

Why retain a stake at all? The likeliest reason is that AT&T, after a long and thorough search, couldn’t find a buyer willing to buy the whole thing at a palatable enough price.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-02-25/at-t-ditches-directv-to-make-room-for-5g-streaming-debt

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »