Microsoft Patent: Chatbots Made From The Online Habits Of Dead People

from the digital-zombies dept

Every once in a while, you come across some story about chatbots. These tend to range from fun stories about how someone makes a chatbot to make some interaction more efficient to some large company making a chatbot that turns out to be horrifically racist thanks to its interactions with the general public. Good times all around, in other words.

But a recent patent granted to Microsoft is a whole different thing.

The patent describes creating a bot based on the “images, voice data, social media posts, electronic messages”, and more personal information.

“The specific person [who the chat bot represents] may correspond to a past or present entity (or a version thereof), such as a friend, a relative, an acquaintance, a celebrity, a fictional character, a historical figure, a random entity etc”, it goes on to say.

“The specific person may also correspond to oneself (e.g., the user creating/training the chat bot,” Microsoft also describes – implying that living users could train a digital replacement in the event of their death.

I’ll go ahead and wait while you finish shivering in revulsion. Done? Cool, because we aren’t done yet. The patent also lays out how the use of a deceased person’s image could be used to create a 3D model of the dearly departed, allowing for the construction of not just a “chatbot”, but one that uses images of a person to make the interaction with others more… personable. And, well, if all of this sounds like something that would have appeared in famed creepy-show Black Mirror, good instincts, because it already did.

The idea that you would be able, in the future, to speak to a simulation of someone who has passed on is not new. It is famously the plot of the Black Mirror episode “Be Right Back”, where a young woman uses a service to scrape data from her deceased partner to create a chatbot – and eventually a robot.

Most will point out that Black Mirror episodes tend to serve as warnings, not how-tos. But let’s all take a breath here. The concept of being able to build some simulacrum for long lost family members or historical figures is no doubt interesting. And, assuming everyone involved understands the limitations for what this technology actually can do and is, the tech itself isn’t particularly harmful.

But what we do need to pay very close attention to are the implications for privacy and transparency should anyone seek to opt into this. Otherwise, you can imagine a world where grandma, having died 2 years ago, suddenly reaches out to you on the internet and wants a quick chat. And that, I feel confident, nobody wants.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: microsoft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Microsoft Patent: Chatbots Made From The Online Habits Of Dead People”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Boba Fat (profile) says:

prior art

Obviously the patent examiner had never read The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

"Yes, an electronic brain," said Frankie, "a simple one would suffice."

"A simple one!" wailed Aurthur.

"Yeah," said Zaphod with a sudden evil grin, "you’d just have to program it to say What? and I don’t understand and Where’s the tea? Who’d know the difference?"

sumgai (profile) says:

So, Microsoft has taken out a patent on how to implement the movie S1m0ne (2002), eh? That may not be the first movie to use that plotline, but it was certainly the most believable one I’ve seen. And no, Max Headroom (1985) doesn’t qualify – that was an actual actor in dress-up, with some mild (by today’s standards) computer enhancements.

My real fear about this is a massive escalation of that old scheme of putting an enemy on all the mailing lists the perpetrator can find; magazine subscriptions, various schools like "Learn To Draw", get-rich-quick schemes, etc. In this day and age, that’s all done via the internet, and with a plausible (and seemingly verifiable) identity, this kind of thing will cause a lot of tears before it gets handled.

In my day, about the most harmful thing I could do was to call someone on the telephone (remember those?!) and ask them if their refrigerator was running. Ah, but Bob Dylan did say it best: "The times they are a-changin’".

Mr Canoehead (profile) says:

Re: Max Headroom

I’m not sure I agree with you a hundred percent on your police work, there, Lou. We’re talking plot lines, not implementation. And Episode 8 of Max Headroom (second episode of season 2) had that exact plot: chatbots made from dead people’s personalities. And in an uncanny parallel to reality, they were crap.
In fact, the episode is a better match to the story than S1m0ne, because it’s about simulating behaviour, not appearance.

sumgai (profile) says:

Re: Re: Max Headroom

MC,

As I noted, S1m0ne wasn’t the first movie, and I didn’t even speak to television materials, I stated only that S. was the best by far, to that point in time. And my researches were conducted via Wikipedia, reference.com, etc. – that’s because my memory looks more like a sieve than a trap.

I do however take exception to the point of "simulating behavior and not appearance". Recall that an AI "grew up" and took control from its creator, and the continued appearance of a simulcrum from that point forward was based exactly on what had been "posted" before the AI took over – "posted" being the equivalent of what the creator had said while in the persona of S1m0ne. That’s exactly what MS is purporting to do, snatch up the social media postings of Person X, and use them to create a believable imitation "Person X", indistinguishable from the real thing.

Indeed, we’ve actually seen many incarnations of believable AI, but so far all of them have been exposed in due time. I think that MS truly believes they’ve overcome that hurdle, and will be "testing" it out on the rest of the online populace…. we’ll see how that turns out, eh?

DNY (profile) says:

Prior art?

A patent on this? The submission better have a lot of detail on exactly how it is to be done, otherwise wouldn’t the Black Mirror episode suffice as an example of prior art to invalidate the patent? I seem to recall the tablets on Star Trek: the Next Generation being successfully invoked as prior art against a design element patent (rectangular with rounded corners) for tablet devices in the real world.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: So, not so much "20 minutes"......

[A]t least it’s not a creepy church doing this to pretend to be giving people’s relatives eternal life…

An Elizabeth Holmes-type leader heads a cult-like cryonics-preservation startup into a miraculous future where super-cooling and super-conductivity cross over from the twilight-zone of superstition into super-science transcending faith.

“The brain waves may be frozen. But they still react. The magnetic coupler inputs your typed words so that the client (we do prefer to think of them as our clients — they’re not stiffs) can react to them directly in the brain’s language center. Then the magnetic pickup senses the reaction. The computer-controlled translator returns the client’s words to your screen.”

sumgai (profile) says:

Re: Re:

…. earn money from the dead

Not odd at all. But the real sticking point is this: who’s gonna be the owner of this "fake but believable" persona?

  • Will it be the person/company who put the pieces together, even if it’s not Person X?
  • Will it be Person X"s estate?
  • And most importantly, if money is being made by anyone, who will the IRS go after for the tax burden??
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Calm down. Gravediggers, coffin makers, and stonr carvers make money from tbe dead. This is just a tasteless and ill conceived version of feeding in all seven Harry Potter books to a predictive keyboard and getting out "Harry Potter and the Portrait of what Looked Like a Large Pile of Ash". Nothing more than a crass parlor trick.

Anonymous Coward says:

The patent

So… reading over the patent you can see that Microsoft did a wonderful job describing all the data points they expect to use and even give some lip service to how that data could be used to simulate a person…
Then it goes into pain staking detail for the ‘on a computer’ part… which is the same sort of thing you’d expect in a BS patent patent like this… most of it feel like a description of pretty much any online service (but done in a boorish, repetitive manner).
It’s not really even clever about the whole, "we have an idea and we’re doing stuff on a computer, so patent"

n00bdragon (profile) says:

Am I the only one less concerned about the fact that recreating the experience of interacting with dead people will be a thing and more concerned with the idea that there now exists a PATENT, an ownable piece of intellectual property, that gives something (someone?) the right to act like a particular human being? I can’t wait for the lawsuits Microsoft can file against anyone too accurately emulating a particular personality. Can you imagine the sheer insanity of OWNING a personality?

We’ve already seen the legal madness over sportsball players and having their tattoos emulated in video games. When John Madden dies and Madden NFL 2K25 comes out featuring his soundalike voice mark my words: it’s happening and there will be lawsuits.

Darkness Of Course (profile) says:

What about swearing?

I use fuck in many circumstances. Less overall since I retired as I am not in the mire of day-to-day corporate stupidity. But, this is the web so the occasional stupidity trickles down, like dog urine down your leg. Like this patent.

Back to fuck. Will they edit out the fuck? Or edit the fuck out of the message? Because nobody would think it was me without a fuck or more. In particular if it reacted to the news, because things are fucking fucked no matter what part of the world you’re living in.

The only thing worse than corps who are morally blind is governments who ignore pandemics, which includes politicians. The fucks.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...