Human Rights Organization Issues Press Freedom Alert Over UK Government's Refusal To Speak To Critical Journalists

from the skin-so-thin-these-days dept

The UK government is fine with press freedom as long as the press confines itself to the unwritten guidelines the government uses to restrict it. Publish too many leaked documents? Well, the government will show up and destroy your computer equipment. Report on the wrong stuff? The government will kick you out of Parliament and tell you not to talk about why you’ve been kicked out. Publish names of people targeted by UK government investigations in the Land of the First Amendment and across the pond from the UK? Expect a UK court to issue a ruling telling you to abide by laws that don’t govern the country you’re actually publishing in.

The UK government is again stepping on free press toes. And human rights organizations have noticed. Independent journalism outfit Declassified UK was recently told its journalistic services were no longer required… or would at least no longer be respected by the Ministry of Defence.

The UK government has been formally warned for threatening press freedom after it blacklisted a group of investigative journalists and denied them access to information.

The Council of Europe issued the Level 2 “media freedom alert” after Ministry of Defence press officers refused to deal with Declassified UK, a website focusing on foreign and defence policy stories.

As the Independent reports, this aligns the UK government with Russia and Turkey, which received similar alerts recently for, respectively, beating and jailing journalists critical of their governments.

Here’s the chain of events that led to the Level 2 alert, as reported by Marcela Kunova of

On 25 August, Declassify UK journalist Phil Miller contacted the MoD’s press office to request a comment about the arrest of Ahmed al Babati, a serving soldier, near Downing Street for protesting the United Kingdom’s involvement in Saudi Arabia’s bombing of Yemen.

Miller was promised information at first but the press office later called him to enquire about the publication’s editorial coverage of the conflict.

“What sort of angle have you taken on the war in Yemen?” the MoD spokesperson asked.


Not long after, Miller received an email telling him that the MoD was not going to send him anything that day, but that he should “submit an FOI [Freedom of Information request] for anything that you require”.


When Miller enquired with his contact at the press office, he was told: “My understanding from the office is that we no longer deal with your publication.”

Declassified UK feels this blacklisting is the result of its earlier reporting on questionable Ministry of Defence activities, like training Saudi pilots who were involved with bombings of civilians in Yemen.

It’s not just the Council of Europe that’s noticed the UK government’s decision to refuse to respond to journalists it apparently doesn’t care for. The International Press Institute has sent a letter to MoD officials criticizing the agency for its actions.

It goes without saying that the exclusion of a media publication by a government ministry due to its investigative reporting would undermine press freedom and set a worrying precedent for other journalists whose job it is to report in the public interest on the British military.

Criticism should be no reason to discriminate against a media publication. In contrast, tough journalism by outlets such as Declassified UK on matters such as the UK’s foreign and military affairs, uncomfortable though it often may be for those in power, is crucial for a transparent and functioning democracy.

The letter also asks for “clarification” on the decision by the MoD’s press office. Presumably, no explanation will be provided. If anything, the MoD will just go back to handing out “no comments” to Declassified UK, rather than call any more attention to itself by cutting the independent journalists out of the minimal info loop.

But, for now, the MoD has aligned itself with Russia and Turkey. It may not be demanding the jailing/beating of critics (at least, not out loud), but it’s shown it’s unwilling to handle criticism like a free world government agency.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: declassify uk

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Human Rights Organization Issues Press Freedom Alert Over UK Government's Refusal To Speak To Critical Journalists”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Bloof (profile) says:

Boris Johnson hid in a fridge to avoid questions so this should come as a surprise to nobody. Unfortunately conservatives control the majority of the press in the UK so nobody will probably notice there’s an embargo on any outlet that will ask difficult questions, not while Phillip Schofield and co will give them softball interviews and pose for selfies.

Anonymous Coward says:

and how many countries, including the USA, are doing the same thing? it’s happening everywhere! governments are using any and every excuse plus whatever security services they want to not just remove peoples rights, to literally destroy them! yep, here’s the conspiracy theory again but all this crap started with the ‘purposefully started ‘financial crisis’. since then, so many countries are behaving just like those countries that tried to instill similar things and were fought against in WWII, now we’re just sitting back, thumbs up bums, brains in neutral and watching everything we hold dear, privacy, freedom etc get trampled underfoot! it’s gonna be a Planet run by a few self proclaimed, self-serving, selfish slave masters and once in, with all the security forces backing them, we wont be able to do a damn thing about it, even if we want to!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Exactly. Protest at the hollow, shallow veneration of the Poppy and how meaningless it has become, when people are scared by ‘terror’ into giving up their right to digital privacy. Funny thing is, that old-fashioned HUMINT (Human Intelligence) would have stopped the London Bridge attacker, or one of them. Someone noticed the extremism and reported him, but it wasn’t taken seriously. Either they are obsessed to a FAULT with digital spying, which is one step forwards, one step backwards, OR they are too busy taking the wholesale spying on ALL citizens to keep the ‘Goyim’ in their invisible prison too seriously instead. Which they require terrorism to OCCASIONALLY actually happen, in order to keep the people scared enough to give up their rights. See also: Omagh bombing, and subsequent peace in N.Ireland.
OK, am I exaggerating? As if it’s not Zionists or some other form of NWO world Gov, who is it? The surname of the GCHQ head is Levy. Statistically-insignificant coincidence? Maybe.
But whilst this is going on near-universally around the world? Maybe not so unimportant.
Since Labour was some sort of threat to the Tory Human Rights-Abuse coup and SUDDENLY their purported Anti-Semitism is important to hype-up, THIS YEAR, whereas it wasn’t two years ago or whatever. That Panorama interview session with the ‘victims’ was a bunch of actors without emotions and logical fallacies. Fake as hell.
IF Corbyn was too anti-semitic, vote Labour in, then change the leadership – it’s the PARTY we vote in, not the leader’s haircut!
Social Media users who don’t care about Democracy, and trust blindly, are a lot of the problem. ALL of them (bar the few privacy-enabled platforms out there, which are tiny in comparison).


Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Except the universally-panned proven-wrong War on Drugs International Law, aka the apparently perpetual-binding treaty known as the Single UN Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961.
You know, the (non-evidence-based thus repeating its mistakes for 50 years despite the evidence that it doesn’t work, is literally the definition of mental illness), law, that says Cannabis and Heroin are to be considered the same category of danger… This law? That pushes mental illness as policy, whilst purporting to protect people from psychosis causing cannabis?
The treaty, administrated by the USA-based UN Narcotics CONTROL Board (hint hint) from a Big Pharma-dominated country with an Opioids crisis and confusion about the legal status of cannabis. All due to Federal culture being in thrall to some sort of control-freak worldwide agenda (spot the recurrent theme here?)
Theresa May had to increase the criminal penalties for Khat whilst she was Home Secretary, and in only ONE article, right at the bottom, right at the end of her explanation on the subject, like an afterthought, was the TRUTH mentioned: "and our international treaty obligations". This was after a bunch of lies about how ‘dangerous’ a mild stimulant like Khat was… Like they give a toss about our Somalian Khat-chewing minority’s health that much! I guess it dents Ritalin sales in theory, so Big Pharma fear it?!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
13:30 A Reagan Judge, The First Amendment, And The Eternal War Against Pornography (63)
12:27 Yelp Asks Court To Stop Texas AG Ken Paxton From Suing Them For Warning Users That Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Scams (51)
13:20 'Porn' Is A Human Right (58)
11:54 American Library Association Data Shows The Party Of Free Speech Is Doing More Than Ever To Silence Speech (83)
10:40 5th Circuit Decides To Rehear Jawboning Case Involving Disinfo Researchers, Realizes It Can't Do That Yet, Changes Mind Hours Later (8)
10:56 Federal Judge Says Fuck The 1st Amendment While Upholding Public University's Drag Show Ban (91)
10:39 White House, States Try To Convince Supreme Court In Jawboning Case (73)
20:09 Delaware State Police Pay $50,000 To Man Troopers Ticketed For Flipping Them Off (23)
09:36 Supreme Court Puts 5th Circuit Ruling On Biden Admin Jawboning Of Social Media Companies On Hold For Shadow Docket Review (41)
10:45 New Jersey Appeals Court Says Even Some Forms Of Harassment Are Protected Speech (27)
13:38 Another Day, Another SLAPP Threat From A ‘Wellness’ Influencer Against Someone Reviewing Their ‘Masterclass’ (16)
09:31 5th Circuit Cleans Up District Court’s Silly Jawboning Ruling About the Biden Admin, Trims It Down To More Accurately Reflect The 1st Amendment (40)
09:27 Court Tosses Arkansas Age Verification Law For Violating The 1st Amendment (16)
15:20 Texas Ruling Shows You Can't Regulate Online Pornography Like A Public Health Crisis (25)
13:30 Court Says Texas’ Adult Content Age Verification Law Clearly Violates The 1st Amendment (35)
12:50 State Governments Can't Resist The Siren Song Of Censorship (81)
10:50 Fifth Circuit Denies Immunity To Detective Who Arrested A Man For A Satirical Facebook Post (21)
12:44 Montana’s Response To Lawsuits Over Laughably Unconstitutional TikTok Ban Is To Say That TikTok Is The Equivalent Of ‘Cancer-Causing Radio’ (19)
09:25 ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Elon Musk Suggests He’s Going To Sue George Soros… For His Free Speech Advocating For Certain Laws (129)
10:47 Jordan's King Approves Bill That Criminalizes Online Anonymity, Publication Of Police Officers Names/Photos (14)
10:58 Kansas Cops Raid Small Town Newspaper In Extremely Questionable 'Criminal Investigation' (26)
09:22 Tennessee Teen Sues School For Suspending Him After He Posted Memes Mocking His Principal (15)
11:57 ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Elon Musk Files Obvious SLAPP Suit Against Non-Profit Critic (49)
10:58 Prime Minister's Brother Latest Victim Of Singapore's 'Fake News' Law (5)
13:45 Court: Injunction Blocking Florida's Anti-Drag Law Applies To Everyone Affected By It, Not Just Venue That Sued It (35)
09:31 How Would The GOP Feel If Democrats In Congress Demanded Details Regarding How Fox News Or The NY Post Made Editorial Decisions? (267)
10:46 Republican AGs Decide That Coercive Jawboning Is Good, Actually (When They Do It) (28)
10:49 Ninth Circuit Dumps Oregon's 'Surreptitious Recording' Law, Handing A First Amendment Win To Project Veritas (35)
10:52 In 303 Creative, By Happily Helping One Bigot, SCOTUS (Perhaps Inadvertently) Helped The Larger Fight Against Bigotry (168)
09:24 EU And Elon Battle Over The New Internet Regulations That Elon Himself Endorsed Last Year (14)
More arrow