From The Stupid To The Bizarre: Trump Demands That His Government Should Take A 'Substantial' Cut Of TikTok's Purchase Fee

from the you-have-to-be-kidding-me dept

The whole TikTok story keeps getting dumber. While we still believe that the weird moral panic about TikTok is overblown and Trump’s threat to ban the company from the US over the weekend is crazy and unconstitutional, people are still taking things seriously. On Friday evening Trump said that he planned to issue an executive order banning the company (which is not quite how any of this works). He didn’t actually do this. He also said he was against an American company like Microsoft buying TikTok, which apparently put the ongoing acquisition talks on hold.

Instead, Microsoft had to call up the President and grovel before him, before he apparently told the company it had until September 15th to work out a deal, and if no deal was made by then, he’d again “ban” TikTok (again, an almost certainly unconstitutional move that would not work). Still, it would be a mess, and I’m sure TikTok and ByteDance (the company’s current owner) knows that it’s probably best to take what it can get from Microsoft while it can. Of course, Microsoft also knows that it’s in a good position because ByteDance has a ticking time bomb on its hands, and the value of TikTok could decrease drastically on September 15th if no deal is made. Even if a ban is unconstitutional, fighting it will take time and money.

Also, it’s not clear if there would be much competition for TikTok from anyone other than Microsoft. I mean, Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg would love to buy it, but pretty much everyone knows that there’s no way in hell that would get approved by the Justice Department. Even if Facebook weren’t already facing a shit ton of antitrust scrutiny from Congress, the FTC, and state Attorneys General, the Bill Barr DOJ has made it clear that it will abuse antitrust to hurt companies Trump is mad at. And contrary to some conspiracy theories, Trump and friends still insist that Facebook is “biased” against them (it’s not). So that wipes out most of the large internet companies that would actually have the capital to buy TikTok. There could be a surprise buyer, but it remains a fairly limited market, at best.

Still, things went from just stupid to downright bizarre on Monday when President Trump announced that he thought most of the money from a TikTok acquisition should go to the US Treasury:

“The United States should get a very large percentage of that price, because we’re making it possible,” Mr Trump said.

“It would come from the sale, which nobody else would be thinking about but me, but that’s the way I think, and I think it’s very fair,” he added.

This is dumb on so many levels. First of all, people have been discussing the possibility of ByteDance having to sell TikTok to get away from questions about its Chinese ownership since long before Trump ever heard of TikTok. So the idea that it’s only because of him is just yet another one of his narcissistic fever dreams. Second, you’re not “making it possible” any more that the local organized crime fixer “makes it possible” for your restaurant to not burn down if you pay up your protection money. That’s called extortion and it’s not the kind of thing that the President should be advocating for. Third, it’s incredibly stupid because even just saying that gives the Chinese government a ton of ammunition, as they started deploying almost immediately:

The state-run China Daily newspaper said on Tuesday that Beijing would not accept the “theft” of a Chinese technology company.

It also warned in an editorial that China had “plenty of ways to respond if the administration carries out its planned smash and grab”.

Considering how much US officials have been whining and screaming about supposed Chinese attempts to “steal American intellectual property,” giving the Chinese government a talking point to argue that the US government “does the same thing” is just a huge diplomatic stupidity.

Everything about this story is ridiculous, but it’s 2020, and you always know that President Trump can take a stupid story and make it stupider.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: bytedance, microsoft, tiktok

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “From The Stupid To The Bizarre: Trump Demands That His Government Should Take A 'Substantial' Cut Of TikTok's Purchase Fee”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
73 Comments
PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Bad Business

He had so many bankruptcies, because he had a habit of making very poor business decisions, ignoring expert advice, then stiffing contractors and claiming bankruptcy to avoid personal liability when they went under. The I’ve read accounts of how he ran his airlines and casinos into the ground, and they seem to follow that pattern.

Just bear in mind when someone says they wanted Trump to run the country like he did his businesses – well, he’s done that, he just doesn’t have the option to claim bankruptcy to avoid the fallout of this failure this time.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Bad Business

"…he just doesn’t have the option to claim bankruptcy to avoid the fallout of this failure this time."

Why would he? Like many of his private deals he’s not the one getting stuck with the bill. He can run the US straight into the ground from orbit, put every citizen in three generations of debt, and/or reenact the versailles treaty in a US version…and still come out of it completely unscathed.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Bad Business

"still come out of it completely unscathed"

Not completely, but I think a lot of people are waiting until he gets his ass out of office before real action begins. At this point, any correctly identified path to prosecute him for his many documented wrongdoings will take too long to do before the election, and as we saw with the Mueller hearings and the impeachment he has too many supporters that will misrepresent the prosecutions and Senate cronies who will protect him even when everyone else agrees he’s guilty. Now, after the election? If there’s will to actually do something (and I honestly think there will be), he’s admitted on camera to many prosecutable offences, and there mounting evidence for many others.

Plus, of course, legal ramifications are not all that can hurt him. He’s a money-obsessed narcissist, and he’s going down in history as not only one of the worst presidents in history, but the blame of the collapse of the economy is on him. He’s living in a bubble at the minutes, running into his safe space the moment someone challenges him on the fake figures and other nonsense he’s pushing, but as soon as he’s out of office he will at some point need to stumble across reality – and it will hurt him.

Call me optimistic, but I think in the next few years that not only are the many frauds perpetrated in office going to lead to some kind of comeback, but his fragile ego is going to get a severe beating. We just have to hope that he gets his ass voted out sooner rather than later.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Bad Business

"Call me optimistic, but I think in the next few years that not only are the many frauds perpetrated in office going to lead to some kind of comeback, but his fragile ego is going to get a severe beating."

We can always hope. I’m not too optimistic though. Bear in mind he’s got 40 years worth of running away from his failures behind him – so he’s not exactly unused to people insisting he face the music. In no few instances, he was, for longer periods, completely flat-out broke and survived only on the idea that no one knew which assets, if any, he actually had claim to.

My guess is if shit gets too hot for him he simply holds a long speech on how the US has been destroyed by liberals and loudly walks into exile – to Russia, probably.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Bad Business

"Bear in mind he’s got 40 years worth of running away from his failures behind him"

It will catch up with him eventually, I hope. Nobody can run forever, lawyers need to actually be paid and I’m sure the pool of lawyers who would actually represent him while knowing he never pays his bills is shrinking. He has a lot of lawsuits against him (here is an incomplete list, some sources say nearly 4,000 active civil cases and growing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lawsuits_involving_Donald_Trump). Many more will be filed once they don’t have the issue of filing against a sitting president to deal with.

I’m hopeful that some of these will hit their targets, and hopefully they won’t be settled as the Trump University case was. The effect of a barrage of lawsuits he can’t buy his way out of should be fun to watch.

"no one knew which assets, if any, he actually had claim to"

This is where it also potentially gets fun. Trump is gradually being forced to release his tax returns. There’s numerous theories as to why he refuses to release them, but the two I like is that they either show him to be broke on paper (or at least vastly less wealthy than he claims to be), or that they expose illegal activity ranging from tax dodging to outright criminal dealings.

Then, there’s whatever skeletons lurk in his Russian closet. It’s well known that he’s been unable to get credit from reputable sources for years, and that in the last decade before his presidency he’s been in hock to Russian and other questionable sources. If he doesn’t get prosecuted for some of those dealing, now that the Trump brand is irrevocably tarnished for many people, what happens when he can’t pay back those loans? What else will be revealed about his links that don’t depend on Mueller being able to find a legal dictionary definition of "collusion" and another investigation reveal things legally actionable that couldn’t be considered during impeachment?

Now, I understand that a lot of this is wishful thinking and depends on various types of cosmic justice being dished out that the man has managed to avoid for so long. But, in the disaster zone of 2020 I am hoping that he will be kicked out of office then slowly destroyed in numerous ways in the following years. We shall see…

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Trump’s executive order banning TikTok will be like all his other impotent orders for things he can’t legally do – something along the lines of "The DOJ and the FCC will investigate any means to make business uncomfortable for TikTok and make recommendations for legislation (that Congress won’t pass)…"

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Perversion of the law doesn't make him right

""The United States should get a very large percentage of that price, because we’re making it possible," Mr Trump said."

If what the US Government has done to make this possible is the threat to ban Tik Tok in the US, wouldn’t that be considered extortion? Like gangs or the mafia threatening a business owner if they didn’t pay protection. Nice store you’ve got there, wouldn’t want anything to happen to it.

Then, what would that actual worth of those actions be? Tik Tok is valued at $75 billion, but that isn’t what the sale price would be. How much is Trump looking to get out of this, and what would he do with that money?

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Perversion of the law doesn't make him right

"This level of political corruption is un-American… "

You have a very rose-tinted view of US history, I must say. The US has always had a world leading level of political corruption. What it hasn’t had, so far, is a president so proud of his part in clinching shady deals he can’t stop himself from claiming the laurels in public.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Perversion of the law doesn't make him right

"Like gangs or the mafia threatening a business owner if they didn’t pay protection. Nice store you’ve got there, wouldn’t want anything to happen to it."

The irony is that this is almost exactly what goes on in every trade deal a nation closes with other countries or internal large businesses. There’s always some form of quid pro quo.

It takes Trump, however, to be inept enough to shout from the pulpit what is by necessity never mentioned in public. Because, naturally, he needs to be seen clinching the grift, and can’t understand that revealing the con tends to spoil it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

He asked for a bribe. He literally asked for whatever company buys TikTok (if that happens) to pay hi—I mean, the Treasury a substantial amount of money from the sale in exchange for the right to buy TikTok in the first place. All the other shit is important, yes, but let’s not ignore the sitting president of the United States asking an American business for a bribe. Because even with the past four years of what-the-fuckery, this is somehow a new low even for Donald Trump.

David says:

Re: Re:

All the other shit is important, yes, but let’s not ignore the sitting president of the United States asking an American business for a bribe. Because even with the past four years of what-the-fuckery, this is somehow a new low even for Donald Trump.

You act as if a new low for Donald Trump would be a noteworthy event, as if his deprevation had already peaked.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Because even with the past four years of what-the-fuckery, this is somehow a new low even for Donald Trump.

Eh, not saying it’s not corrupt as hell but it’s hardly the lowest he’s sunk, as I’d put ‘politicize a global pandemic, leading to an immense death toll that’s only getting higher’ as the lowest to date, as while blatant corruption like this is bad it doesn’t have a body count attached

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I don’t know. Presidents all have body counts attached based on their decisions — it’s why they’re to some degree legally protected here. Sure, Trump has through mismanagement overseen the worst American loss of life to one cause in the history of the US, but that stops when he leaves.

The problem with corruption on this level is that it sets new precedent, which will reverberate through International politics and domestic politics for decades to come. This is how you destroy the democracy that generally protects against things like Trump; THAT can result in much more loss of life, liberty and happiness for years after he’s gone.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

"I don’t know. Presidents all have body counts attached based on their decisions"

Agreed.
However, I do not think they are all comparable. For example, I do not think WWII body count can be compared to that from Vietnam and neither one can be compared to that of Covid-19.

A majority of the covid deaths could have been prevented had the existing pandemic plan been put in place rather than put in the trash.
All of the Vietnam deaths could have been avoided by not getting into the mess in the first place. What the hell was France doing there anyway?
WWII – I don’t know about that one … could it have been avoided? I suppose but …

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

"WWII – I don’t know about that one … could it have been avoided? I suppose but …"

I can answer that. Yes.

The versailles treaty was explicitly intended to punish Germany for generations – which resulted in the utterly hopeless hyperinflation as the country tried to pay off reparations at a rate exceeding their own GDP. When Hitler came along the country was in a depth of despair hard to imagine. A nation of skilled engineers, world-class scholars and scientists, a massive industrial capacity…brought to a state of collapse by a treaty meant to humiliate the citizenry for generations.

So, a nation in crisis under persistent inept/corrupt leadership, massively increasing voter apathy…now all you need is a strongman with a genius in finding idiot savants and putting them in all the right places. Then win the election with 12% of the total vote because every other candidate was too impopular, too mistrusted, or had been too intimidated to stand.

That’s how you get to WW2.

"All of the Vietnam deaths could have been avoided by not getting into the mess in the first place. "

Yeah, but that would have meant giving all of vietnam – and all of indochina – up to China and the USSR. Instead first france and later on the US decided to support a highly unpopular and corrupt despotic regime with predictable results.
You could argue WHY communism was seen as such a great alternative by the citizenry in many nations such as Vietnam and Cuba.
And possibly debate the merits of possibly NOT supporting the worst douchebag dictator possible just because he was welcoming to US influence.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4 Re:

"The domino theory. Many believed it back then, most now do not."

The full set wasn’t necessary – as far as the US was concerned in that time. If Vietnam and Cambodia were affiliated with the USSR or Red China the fear was that the US would lose most convenient passages through the east indian ocean.

And for the strategic key players the US had the problem that they’d consistently been backing the worst sort of despotic scum which tended to breed revolutions. You’d think the US of all nations would be leery about backing the thug whose reign was so bad it prompted citizens to stand up and scream "Give me liberty or give me death!" but it’s been remarkably blind to its own history when it came to foreign policy. Hence why Cuba was lost, for instance, and why Vietnam became a case of putting boots on the ground AND still losing it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

"The Versailles treaty was explicitly intended to punish Germany for generations – which resulted in the utterly hopeless hyperinflation"

That inflation happened in the early 1920’s. By 1929 Germany had recovered reasonably well, but then the stock markets crashed, caused by reckless lending in the US. The Great Depression might have been avoided, if US and UK had responded wisely to the crash. When Hitler became chancellor he had large emergency powers, enabled by laws that were intended to quell another communist revolution (like the one in 1919). In the years that followed he could have been stopped by the UK and France, but they were wary of another large military conflict after the Great War. Besides, the Nazis were doing a fine job crushing the lefties.

WW II might have been prevented in lots of ways. Versailles was not the only cause. It’s complicated.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
David says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Trump has through mismanagement overseen the worst American loss of life to one cause in the history of the US, but that stops when he leaves.

That’s not how pandemics work. Manage to put the reproduction rate of the virus to 0.9 (not an easy task, and about the rate Germany has managed in above-average times), and about 10 times your current infection count will still get infected before the pandemic fizzles.

And we are in summer right now. Whoever inherits the shit fest Donald Trump has built up with the help of his Republican governors will see a death toll far dwarfing the current numbers even if things are done responsibly and consistently then.

If there is a change in government in November, the Republicans will be able to blame a humongous death toll on whoever comes next. Heck, they still currently blame Obama because of bad tests and national stockpiles, and he was four years out of office before the virus even became a thing. So at least they get to blame someone actually in charge.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

They will. I’ve heard Republican politicians try blaming Obama for both 9/11 and the response to Katrina. The economic crash was somehow his fault even though the crash and first bailouts happened before he was president. They were trying to impeach him before he was inaugurated. If Biden wins, they won’t wait until January to try pinning the pandemic on him somehow.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4 Re:

"The economic crash was somehow his fault even though the crash and first bailouts happened before he was president."

Well, the republicans would be whining about how a democrat president was to blame for <whatever> to a far greater degree than the democrats will in the reverse, but when it comes to Obama specifically they look for any link, no matter how stretched, to provide support for blame.

Obama, after all, is black. And a black man as POTUS is, to a great many republicans, such a traumatic nightmare the PTSD will linger for generations.

David says:

Re: Re: Re:5 Re:

Eisenhower, a Republican president, sent the National Guard to desegregate Southern schools over Southern governors defying Supreme Court decisions.

He was succeeded (with half a term of JFK in between) by Lyndon B Johnson who passed the voting right acts and some other measures intended to address inequalities in how citizens were factually able to claim their rights. That was when the racists started seeking a new home which the Republican Party’s "Southern Strategy" provided.

What has become of the party that historically drove abolitionism is a disgrace. The voice of racial hatred deserves no future, and it would be preferable for U.S. society if the Republican Party divested itself of it before going down with it. Because voters deserve having a choice between policy packages that don’t include bigotry as a mandatory element.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:6 Re:

"Eisenhower, a Republican president, sent the National Guard to desegregate Southern schools over Southern governors defying Supreme Court decisions."

Ironically Eisenhower would, today, be considered a hard-left liberal by the standards of the current GOP.

"That was when the racists started seeking a new home which the Republican Party’s "Southern Strategy" provided."

It started a bit before. The foundation of the republican-democrat 180 degree shift in ideology was laid when FDR implemented his "New Deal" – support programs, government regulation of industry/banks, affirmative action to get black people into positions of power, etc.

I’d argue that the shift continued all the way up until now when you can say the last liberals and genuine conservatives have left the current GOP, leaving behind only a cadre of ideologically blank opportunists backed by everyone who now defines their entire existence around what they fear and hate.

You know, Very Fine People and those who speak for them.

"…it would be preferable for U.S. society if the Republican Party divested itself of it before going down with it."

I think that may, by now, be too late. John McCain may have been that last lonely white whale left over from the old-style conservatives in the GOP. Sure, the Lincoln project has a few republicans still willing to name themselves such, but you’d be hard-pressed to find even half a dozen republicans today in politics who aren’t spiritual peers to the likes of Lindsey Graham or Steve King.

"Because voters deserve having a choice between policy packages that don’t include bigotry as a mandatory element."

So they do, and until they manage to vote into power someone whose platform includes to reform the electoral system that’s what they aren’t getting. Because in the end it’s the US system of Winner Takes All which has ensured not only the preservation of the two-party system the founding fathers dreaded but the persistently increased extremism of one part and soft all-inclusive nonentity status of the other.

David says:

Re: Re: Re:7 Re:

"Eisenhower, a Republican president, sent the National Guard to desegregate Southern schools over Southern governors defying Supreme Court decisions."

Ironically Eisenhower would, today, be considered a hard-left liberal by the standards of the current GOP.

Also "Law and Order" once meant enforcing rather than disregarding the Constitution.

nasch (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:7 Re:

I think that may, by now, be too late. John McCain may have been that last lonely white whale left over from the old-style conservatives in the GOP. Sure, the Lincoln project has a few republicans still willing to name themselves such, but you’d be hard-pressed to find even half a dozen republicans today in politics who aren’t spiritual peers to the likes of Lindsey Graham or Steve King.

There’s a good case to be made that the Republican party now consists of two parts: the plutocrats, who push for tax cuts for the wealthy (which is extremely unpopular) and the white nationalists who stoke racial and cultural divides in order to get the votes necessary to keep the party in power. The former has no particular interest in the latter except as a means to an end.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/explaining-the-gops-mix-of-plutocrats-and-populists/2020/07/09/9eba4d0c-8333-11ea-878a-86477a724bdb_story.html

Unfortunately rather than tempering either the plutocracy or the ethnonationalism in order to appeal to a broader base, they’ve been tending toward corrupting democracy instead.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

"Presidents all have body counts attached based on their decisions"

Yes. This is the highest in recent, though, and unlike other warmongering presidents it’s all American lives.

"but that stops when he leave"

Not instantly, it doesn’t. There will be at least a couple of years worth of bodies to count after he’s kicked out, assuming he doesn’t manage to find a way to stay in power despite all this (remember, he’s not only claiming he might not accept the election result, he’s doing his best to stop people from voting safely).

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

"He asked for a bribe. He literally asked for whatever company buys TikTok (if that happens) to pay hi—I mean, the Treasury a substantial amount of money from the sale in exchange for the right to buy TikTok in the first place."

That’s not very clever. He should have granted the sale to Facebook instead, in exchange for a nice bit of assistance during the election campaign.

Even when he does corruption, he does it in a stupid way.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Corruption and stupidity make such delightful pairings...

As if it wasn’t already blindingly obvious that the anger towards TikTok has nothing to do with ‘national security’ and everything to do with Trump getting his feelings hurt by being punked, demanding a cut of the sale that he’s trying to force is just all sorts of blatantly corrupt, serving as yet another example of Trump’s signature mix of narcissism, raging idiocy and rampant corruption.

David says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Corruption and stupidity make such delightful pa

100 IQ can barely operate a gas pump.
If half the U.S.’ population can barely operate a gas pump, that implies that the U.S. education system is not appropriate for a populace intended to live and work in modern times.

It doesn’t really matter if a person is below the 50% median or below the national average. They shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a ballot or a keyboard.

Disenfranchisement is not how democracy works. If undereducation is a systematic problem, not letting the undereducated participate in determining national policies is not going to improve the system.

If fear of the uneducated is what lets the better educated people vote for better access to education, this is progress.

Democracy is about recognizing that for better or worse, we are all in the same country and economy, and making choices matched to that situation.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Corruption and stupidity make such delightfu

If undereducation is a systematic problem, not letting the undereducated participate in determining national policies is not going to improve the system

Actually, that was the basis of the system. White male freeholders were intended to be the voters, and that tended to screen out “undesirables” such as the less educated, the darker-complected, the female, and the less wealthy.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Corruption and stupidity make such delightful pa

"100 IQ can barely operate a gas pump"
Some attitude.
IQ tests are well known to be quite fallible and produce results that are not easily compared, but yeah – let’s make fun of supposedly stupid people cause it is so much fun.

"They shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a ballot or a keyboard"
As David pointed out, democracy does not work like that. Literacy tests were outlawed by the voters rights act, took a while to get that on paper I guess.

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Corruption and stupidity make such delightful pa

"100 IQ can barely operate a gas pump."

Actually 100 IQ is, by definition, average. As in not notably dumb.

That said actual idiocy has little to do with IQ in itself. Someone who is merely dull-witted still knows to step in out of the rain rather than stay and convince himself he’s standing under blue skies on a sunny day.

And THAT is what makes the pro-trump death cult a phenomenon not easily discarded by claiming they’re "dumb".

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Evidently, with tactics like these, the US is a banana republic – and this is rather blatant even by banana republic standards – so countries like Nigeria will soon be warning their millions of wealthy princes not to risk investing in this dumpster fire of a nation.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Bloof (profile) says:

Re: Re:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/qanon-targets-africa-with-new-conspiracy-that-democrats-are-stealing-local-children

Unfortunately Americans are currently spamming Nigerian social media with QAnon conspiracies, claiming American Democrats are stealing their children so soon enough it’ll be very unlikely they’ll want anything to do with the US.

Anonymous Coward says:

I think some stupid conservatives say tik Tok
is a Chinese company that collects data on us teenagers , please ignore that 1000,s of other apps do the same thing , or the fact that the nsa or the FBI
can easily collect browsing data, email data on anyone they want to without going to the trouble
of installing an app on your phone.
And your isp is happy to sell your browsing data and location
to advertisers.
It’s ok if we do it but God forbid anyone else might do it.
There’s alot of bribery that go’s on in Russia or
other country’s but its not usually at the point
where the president asks for money to be paid to
allow a company to buy another company

David says:

Re: Re:

You seem upset. Just don’t consider the Tiktok payment a bribe. Consider it a punishment for Tiktok users making Trump’s Tulsa rally look ridiculous by pretending to come and then not appearing.

Social media on which anything is organised that is not delightful for Trump will be dismantled.

The U.S. cannot uncontestedly let China be the world leader in suppressing free speech.

Glenn says:

Everyone is biased, for or against something or someone, and there’s nothing wrong with that, when there’s some rationality behind it. It’s being prejudiced that’s wrong (mostly, but not always). Any bias against Trump (once simply–and jokingly–called "The Donald" but now called [no joke] "The Stupid" and "The Bizarre" both here and many other places [along with many other such monikers]) is quite justified by his words and behavior but, as you say, not illegal even if there were any actions (such as censorship) taken by private entities to suppress all of that stupid (now a noun). It’s only government censorship that’s illegal. Yet again it’s Trump and the GOP trying to censor opponents and critics in violation of US law (and as usual lying about others doing it to them).

Scary Devil Monastery (profile) says:

Re: Re:

"Of course, the idiot doesn’t realize that all China needs to do is take his precedent and use it to force Google, Facebook, et al, to sell their Chinese business operations to Chinese companies."

Whether he does or not, is it Trump’s problem if the US tech sector sinks like a lead balloon? In fact, if China did do that Trump would be lyrical with joy because that’d give him all the ammo he’d need for his next "blame china" speech.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...