FISA Court Finds The FBI Is Still Violating The Fourth Amendment With Its Abuse Of NSA Collections

from the no-surprises-here dept

The NSA isn’t the only agency to abuse its surveillance powers. The FBI’s ability to access unminimized data harvested by the NSA has resulted in abuse after abuse, as the FBI loves to use the massive data haul to perform “backdoor searches” of its domestic targets.

This concern has been raised repeatedly, most notably by Sen. Ron Wyden, who has been calling out surveillance abuses for years — specifically calling out these backdoor searches and hinting (strongly) that they are much more prevalent than most people believed. Nothing much has been done about it, other than multiple federal agencies suggesting they too should be put on the ever-growing list of entities with access to the NSA’s multiple collections.

A FISA Court opinion released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) details even more abuse of the NSA’s Section 702 collections by the FBI. When you give an agency the power to dig into massive amounts of data with minimal oversight, abuses will happen. But this goes further than “inadvertent” collections or erroneous access of unminimized data. This ruling [PDF] — first reported on by the Wall Street Journal — shows the FBI treats sensitive collections as its personal playground.

The October 2018 court ruling identifies improper searches of raw intelligence databases by the bureau in 2017 and 2018 that were deemed problematic in part because of their breadth, which sometimes involved queries related to thousands or tens of thousands of pieces of data, such as emails or telephone numbers. In one case, the ruling suggested, the FBI was using the intelligence information to vet its personnel and cooperating sources. Federal law requires that the database only be searched by the FBI as part of seeking evidence of a crime or for foreign-intelligence information.

In other instances, the court ruled that the database had been improperly used by individuals. In one case, an FBI contractor ran a query of an intelligence database—searching information on himself, other FBI personnel and his relatives, the court revealed.

The partially-redacted, 138-page opinion makes it clear the FBI has frequently abused its access to the NSA’s surveillance collections, which include emails, phone numbers, and a host of other digital detritus. Using collections authorized only to be used for national security purposes to perform security reviews of FBI personnel is obviously contrary to the intention of the program — a purpose that is always reiterated loudly any time someone suggests surveillance should be curtailed. This opinion vindicates Wyden’s incessant demands the FBI come clean about its backdoor searches. Wyden argued the FBI abused this power frequently. This opinion makes it clear the FBI abuses its “backdoor” access to domestic data constantly.

The weirdest thing is the Trump DOJ argued in court the program the FBI abused cannot be modified without harming the security of the nation. Yep, the administration that claims the “Deep State” is out to get it showed up in court to argue the Deep State should not have its power curtailed.

The court rejected this faulty premise. It also pointed out how severely any misuse of this power contains the potential to harm dozens, if not thousands, of people. Considering the breadth of the collection, running a single improper search returns hundreds, if not thousands, of records the FBI has no business retrieving. Using the database to vet employees or perform natsec vanity searches does not comply with the restrictions on the FBI’s searches, which are only supposed to return data related to criminal activity (and then only certain crimes) and/or foreign intelligence information.

As usual, Sen. Ron Wyden was the first to go on record criticizing the FBI and its backdoor searches following the release of the FISA opinion.

Last year, when Congress reauthorized Section 702 of FISA, it accepted the FBI’s outright refusal to account for all its warrantless backdoor searches of Americans. Today’s release demonstrates how baseless the FBI’s position was and highlights Congress’ constitutional obligation to act independently and strengthen the checks and balances on government surveillance. The information released today also reveals serious abuses in the FB’s backdoor searches, underscoring the need for the government to seek a warrant before searching through mountains of private data on Americans. Finally, I am concerned that the government has redacted information in these releases that the public deserves to know.

Wyden makes good points. And they’re points he’s made for years. Unfortunately, the FBI continues to do the stuff it shouldn’t and the public has to read between the redactions in an (often vain) attempt to see what’s being done to them in the name of “national security.”

The abuses will continue until Congress or the FISA Court decide they’ve seen enough. While both entities have chastised agencies with access to NSA collections, neither have taken any action that will head off future misuse of surveillance databases in the future. We’re a reactionary nation when it comes to surveillance abuse and that’s just not going to prevent future abuses. But that’s the nature of the national security beast. No one’s allowed to know what’s going on until after everything bad has happened.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FISA Court Finds The FBI Is Still Violating The Fourth Amendment With Its Abuse Of NSA Collections”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
16 Comments
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Depends upon ones definition of 'national security'.

"…the FBI was using the intelligence information to vet its personnel and cooperating sources."

That is in the interest of national security. The problem comes in the interpretation of the data found. This is explicitly shown in that the process failed to exclude those people who were not only doing the illegal searches, but their supervisors as well. Then there is the question of cooperating sources who helped build cases against marginal folks in the FBI’s sting operations.

What’s not to like, from the FBI’s standpoint?

JBS says:

Re: Depends upon ones definition of 'national security'.

The problem is that the FBI in conjunction with thousands of private contractors (many hired by the federal agencies including the FBI but who actually worked for the big banks and corporations behind financing the war we are living through now) targeted and framed US citizens across all fifty states under Obama to create fake criminal case files filled with fabricated electronic "evidence" for the Special Counsel to secretly make sealed indictments for whistleblowers, people feared to have a significant amount of incriminating information about their crimes, and others randomly selected to be set up as patsies via electronic fraud. The contractors were staging encounters between unsuspecting US civilians and foreign assets who pretended to be that other than they were just to trick the targets into interacting with them. Once such a line of communication was established, the FBI applied to the FISA court to obtain a warrant to open an "investigation" on the "suspected" target. After the "investigations" were open, the private contractors got the electronic frame-up jobs underway by utilizing the HAMR supercomputer surveillance system to plant fabricated "evidence" on the phones and laptops of innocent Americans. This was achieved through masking the files with information overlays so that if the targets came across questionable downloads on their phones or laptops, they remained unaware of the content. The FBI simply collected it and compiled it into bogus criminal case files. These files were then quietly referred to the Special Counsel after the 2016 election so they could make sealed indictments for their targets. In short, the contractors and the FBI under Obama ran a weaponized nationwide counterintelligence scapegoating operation using the HAMR and FISA as subterfuge to hide their crimes against the people.

ECA (profile) says:

So..

You want national Policing agency NOT to share data with Another National policing agency?..

Remember 911? and all the Bitching about Who did what and who didnt pass along CERTAIN data??

Just cause 1 group missed certain data, the other group may have picked it up..and has it stored.
HOw would it be, that the State and county had a missing person.. Looked all over and didnt find them.. but the Fed Had certain info on certain people allowed into this country. And the Probable happenings of a lost person.

Anonymous Coward says:

Remember everyone in Congress has been surveiled too

The FBI now has access to some of the blackmail that can be used on the current generation of congresspersons. All of the drug deals, cheating, and other illegal activities are available in a nice neat package for use whenever anyone even thinks about curtailing the access that the FBI deams vital to the survival of the nation.

Personanongrata says:

Fishing is Boring, Unless Your Trolling for Evidence with FBI

FISA Court Finds The FBI Is Still Violating The Fourth Amendment With Its Abuse Of NSA Collections

What sanctions will the Constitution shredding fractions of americans at FBI suffer for abusing their authority in conducting illegal surveillance while trolling NSA’s Section 702 collections for evidence of a crime?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...